386 réponses à ce sujet

[Jarl Johnnie Walker]

Crimson Sound wrote...

None of Bioware's games are romance simulators. If that portion of the game was cut, I would still buy it. However, if you're the kind of person who buys Mass Effect or Dragon Age for the romance, I highly advise that you not buy the game. Instead, go out and spend time with your actual significant other. If you don't have one, find one.

The only moments I spend time with my significant other is when she's delivering me sammiches and open beer bottles. And if there is some missing in the bottle, then I'm gonna have to spend even more time with that woman with some pimp slapping.

[A Crusty Knight Of Colour]

SylvuisTheSwag wrote...

Nah the perspective of skyrim romances is to **** ****es and get money. First sector of your romance you **** ****es then after that you get money

[Texhnolyze101]

superdeathdealer14 wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

Dragons Dogma has child romances which is both weird and not unsurprising since the age of consent in Japan is 12 i think.

DD doesn't have "child romances".  It has a FUBAR "Beloved" system that somehow allows one of the characters to become an option due to frequency of dialogue interaction. 

So its basically a broken version of Biowares gift system from DAO?

Worse: there's no actual choice in the matter.  The last character you maxed your reputation with becomes your love interest late in the game.  It's turrrrrrrible. 

I guess i will just not talk to my companions anymore..well except  the one i tried my hardest to make look like JT

You can't raise your pawns affinity for you so in other words you can't romance them anyway.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO D: so my Justin Timberlake pawn is just for show now? lame...

Modifié par 101ezylonhxeT, 12 janvier 2014 - 06:26 .

[superdeathdealer14]

sylvanaerie wrote...

I would play without romances. It's a moot point since I expect there to be something at least. I got Awakenings and you can't even flirt in that one.

Skyrim's romance is a joke. Put on an amulet and attract a bride/groom. My first PC was a 'forever alone' elf. Didn't even take a companion with her because they are less than useless (or were to her anyway). My second I expect to go the same.  And I am still enjoying it, though I can't effectively play a mage which is my usual class in games because I haven't got the hang of magic yet.  But I still play.

The only thing that would be a deal breaker for me is if my PC can't handle the game engine. Then it's a hardware issue, not content.

If there is one thing I can say about marriage in Skyrim it's this: to this very day I'm still saddened that I can't marry Serana.

[MassivelyEffective0730]

dreamgazer wrote...

Inquisitor Recon wrote...

Pedophiles, furries and more now part of your improved BSN experience.

Inclusivity!

Anything to appease the SJW's, even at the cost of our sanity. 

Modifié par MassivelyEffective0730, 12 janvier 2014 - 06:43 .

[saMoorai]

sylvanaerie wrote...

I would play without romances. It's a moot point since I expect there to be something at least. I got Awakenings and you can't even flirt in that one.

Skyrim's romance is a joke. Put on an amulet and attract a bride/groom. My first PC was a 'forever alone' elf. Didn't even take a companion with her because they are less than useless (or were to her anyway). My second I expect to go the same.  And I am still enjoying it, though I can't effectively play a mage which is my usual class in games because I haven't got the hang of magic yet.  But I still play.

The only thing that would be a deal breaker for me is if my PC can't handle the game engine. Then it's a hardware issue, not content.

To be fair to Skyrim, there was a pretty nice implied romance with Serana.


and man, if this Thread continues like this, I might have to break out the Big Romantic Rubber Fist.

[CynicalShep]

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

superdeathdealer14 wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

Dragons Dogma has child romances which is both weird and not unsurprising since the age of consent in Japan is 12 i think.

DD doesn't have "child romances".  It has a FUBAR "Beloved" system that somehow allows one of the characters to become an option due to frequency of dialogue interaction. 

So its basically a broken version of Biowares gift system from DAO?

Worse: there's no actual choice in the matter.  The last character you maxed your reputation with becomes your love interest late in the game.  It's turrrrrrrible. 

I guess i will just not talk to my companions anymore..well except  the one i tried my hardest to make look like JT

You can't raise your pawns affinity for you so in other words you can't romance them anyway.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO D: so my Justin Timberlake pawn is just for show now? lame...

Did he bring sexy back tho?

[dreamgazer]

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

AresKeith wrote...

Tbh, the one game that I wish DID have romance content was Kingdom of Amalur

It does have one option. 

No

Hey, I didn't say you had to like it.

Whats wrong with that dark elf? is she evil?

No, she's just kind of a dink. 

Also, Keith, apparently there is a "wedding" sidequest in that DLC, so knock yourself out, buddy: 

[Cainhurst Crow]

So can I call a vote of no confidence in the mods yet? I mean, seriously. Just look at this.

[Texhnolyze101]

CynicalShep wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

superdeathdealer14 wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

Dragons Dogma has child romances which is both weird and not unsurprising since the age of consent in Japan is 12 i think.

DD doesn't have "child romances".  It has a FUBAR "Beloved" system that somehow allows one of the characters to become an option due to frequency of dialogue interaction. 

So its basically a broken version of Biowares gift system from DAO?

Worse: there's no actual choice in the matter.  The last character you maxed your reputation with becomes your love interest late in the game.  It's turrrrrrrible. 

I guess i will just not talk to my companions anymore..well except  the one i tried my hardest to make look like JT

You can't raise your pawns affinity for you so in other words you can't romance them anyway.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO D: so my Justin Timberlake pawn is just for show now? lame...

Did he bring sexy back tho?

Oh he brought it back alright and it ended with a tko

[sylvanaerie]

saMOOrai182 wrote...

sylvanaerie wrote...

I would play without romances. It's a moot point since I expect there to be something at least. I got Awakenings and you can't even flirt in that one.

Skyrim's romance is a joke. Put on an amulet and attract a bride/groom. My first PC was a 'forever alone' elf. Didn't even take a companion with her because they are less than useless (or were to her anyway). My second I expect to go the same.  And I am still enjoying it, though I can't effectively play a mage which is my usual class in games because I haven't got the hang of magic yet.  But I still play.

The only thing that would be a deal breaker for me is if my PC can't handle the game engine. Then it's a hardware issue, not content.

To be fair to Skyrim, there was a pretty nice implied romance with Serana.


and man, if this Thread continues like this, I might have to break out the Big Romantic Rubber Fist.

I only have base game, no DLC's.  Isn't she a DLC character?  Dawnguard or something like that?

[Augustei]

superdeathdealer14 wrote...
If there is one thing I can say about marriage in Skyrim it's this: to this very day I'm still saddened that I can't marry Serana.

Indeed, she was the only interesting one

[wolfhowwl]

Yep. Dawnguard.

[AresKeith]

dreamgazer wrote...

No, she's just kind of a dink. 

Also, Keith, apparently there is a "wedding" sidequest in that DLC, so knock yourself out, buddy: 

I know all about it

No thanks lol

[Cainhurst Crow]

Half the people here will be banned just for the crime of quote pyramid scheming.

[CynicalShep]

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

CynicalShep wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

superdeathdealer14 wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

101ezylonhxeT wrote...

Dragons Dogma has child romances which is both weird and not unsurprising since the age of consent in Japan is 12 i think.

DD doesn't have "child romances".  It has a FUBAR "Beloved" system that somehow allows one of the characters to become an option due to frequency of dialogue interaction. 

So its basically a broken version of Biowares gift system from DAO?

Worse: there's no actual choice in the matter.  The last character you maxed your reputation with becomes your love interest late in the game.  It's turrrrrrrible. 

I guess i will just not talk to my companions anymore..well except  the one i tried my hardest to make look like JT

You can't raise your pawns affinity for you so in other words you can't romance them anyway.

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO D: so my Justin Timberlake pawn is just for show now? lame...

Did he bring sexy back tho?

Oh he brought it back alright and it ended with a tko

Was he lovin' it? 

[Texhnolyze101]

Darth Brotarian wrote...

So can I call a vote of no confidence in the mods yet? I mean, seriously. Just look at this.

Mods no longer exist Darth because i choose the red ending BSN WILL CHOOSE ITS OWN PATH TO ASCENDENCY!

[Br3admax]

Marriage kills characters in Skyrim. It's a metaphor for life. Why would you want to get married to anyone in any game ever?

[dreamgazer]

AresKeith wrote...

dreamgazer wrote...

No, she's just kind of a dink. 

Also, Keith, apparently there is a "wedding" sidequest in that DLC, so knock yourself out, buddy: 

I know all about it

No thanks lol

Oh, one step ahead of me, huh?

You have a Rast Brattigan body pillow, don't you?

[sylvanaerie]

Well, anyway, the point I was trying to make was, even if I don't have a romance in a game, I still will find ways to enjoy it. Romances add a lot more, and Bioware does romance pretty damn good IMO compared to others I've seen/played.

But the only deal breaker for me is if I can't play on PC cause I suck at console stuff.

[saMoorai]

sylvanaerie wrote...

saMOOrai182 wrote...

sylvanaerie wrote...

I would play without romances. It's a moot point since I expect there to be something at least. I got Awakenings and you can't even flirt in that one.

Skyrim's romance is a joke. Put on an amulet and attract a bride/groom. My first PC was a 'forever alone' elf. Didn't even take a companion with her because they are less than useless (or were to her anyway). My second I expect to go the same.  And I am still enjoying it, though I can't effectively play a mage which is my usual class in games because I haven't got the hang of magic yet.  But I still play.

The only thing that would be a deal breaker for me is if my PC can't handle the game engine. Then it's a hardware issue, not content.

To be fair to Skyrim, there was a pretty nice implied romance with Serana.


and man, if this Thread continues like this, I might have to break out the Big Romantic Rubber Fist.

I only have base game, no DLC's.  Isn't she a DLC character?  Dawnguard or something like that?

Yeah. Dawnguard as a whole was pretty good. If you can, I'd recommend picking it up sometime.

[Cainhurst Crow]

Br3ad wrote...

Marriage kills characters in Skyrim. It's a metaphor for life. Why would you want to get married to anyone in any game ever?

Deductible tax benefits.

Modifié par Darth Brotarian, 12 janvier 2014 - 06:35 .

[BobZilla84]

I would still buy Inquistion without Romances because they are optional content but at the same time I hate loosing content period because in my opinion Less Content=Less Replayability. I played through Origins 9 times DA2 3 times and I intend to play through Inquistion 5 times at minimium.

[Cainhurst Crow]

sylvanaerie wrote...

Well, anyway, the point I was trying to make was, even if I don't have a romance in a game, I still will find ways to enjoy it. Romances add a lot more, and Bioware does romance pretty damn good IMO compared to others I've seen/played.

But the only deal breaker for me is if I can't play on PC cause I suck at console stuff.

lol look at you, trying to have an on topic discussion.

It's adorable tbh.

[Br3admax]

Darth Brotarian wrote...

Br3ad wrote...

Marriage kills characters in Skyrim. It's a metaphor for life. Why would you want to get married to anyone in any game ever?

Deductible tax benefits.

A homecooked meal and a hundred gold a day, the cost of a bar fight, is what marriage is worth to you? Sounds about right.