60 réponses à ce sujet

[BlueMagitek]

I think the important thing here is that you discount playthroughs without a walkthrough. For shame. :/

[Well]

Nope.I will play the game and decide as I go thru it.

[Angrywolves]

uh didn't we have that will the blood mage thread ?

Amazes me some players want to commit genocide, spill buckets of blood and do other unsavory things in DAI and actually believe Gaider would write that in.
And if he did, they want to completely ignore all that has been said about consequences in the game from Laidlaw and hints that the other party members can turn against the Inquisitor and either leave or try to kill the Inquisitor.
Certain players seem to want to completely ignore that.

Oh one even said to me in a thread "nobody ever does that" when I warned him about the consequences.

shrugs.

I really want some players who say they want to commit such bad deeds to get a comeuppance.I really really do.

Extreme , psychotic or fanatic ? Applies as much to players as it does to any possible Inquisitor or so it seems.

Cameron Lee did mention freedom but freedom can come with a hefty price tag so we'll see where it all goes.

Modifié par Angrywolves, 15 janvier 2014 - 12:08 .

[ames4u]

I play the middle woman as often as possible, but mostly, I attempt to help however I can-so long as it does not offend my Inquisitors moral compass. White knight type with a bit of a vindictive streak when crossed. You just have to love passive aggressive tendencies.

Inquisitor: Oh? Someone smashed a beer bottle over your head? Who was it and where can I find them? I'd like to 'thank' them for their kindness-repeatedly if need be. Over and over until teeth and bits of gory flesh decorate the bar room floor.

Modifié par ames4u, 15 janvier 2014 - 01:01 .

[Riverdaleswhiteflash]

Angrywolves wrote...

uh didn't we have that will the blood mage thread ?

Amazes me some players want to commit genocide, spill buckets of blood and do other unsavory things in DAI and actually believe Gaider would write that in.

He did in Origins. Amazes me that you would ignore that.

And if he did, they want to completely ignore all that has been said about consequences in the game from Laidlaw and hints that the other party members can turn against the Inquisitor and either leave or try to kill the Inquisitor.
Certain players seem to want to completely ignore that.

Oh one even said to me in a thread "nobody ever does that" when I warned him about the consequences.

You can duck them in Origins, at least. Which isn't to say there are none, of course.

On topic: If the game interests me enough for a second playthrough (and if it's anything like Origins, it probably will) that'll probably be my Complete Monster playthrough. (Or as close as the game lets me get.)

Modifié par Riverdaleswhiteflash, 15 janvier 2014 - 02:46 .

[BlueMagitek]

The joke is, you sacrifice a roomful of slaves for like, 1 Con. Blood Magic has terrible dividends when you get, what, a +2 to any stat from reading books?

[Bizantura]

Angrywolves wrote...

uh didn't we have that will the blood mage thread ?

Amazes me some players want to commit genocide, spill buckets of blood and do other unsavory things in DAI and actually believe Gaider would write that in.
And if he did, they want to completely ignore all that has been said about consequences in the game from Laidlaw and hints that the other party members can turn against the Inquisitor and either leave or try to kill the Inquisitor.
Certain players seem to want to completely ignore that.

Oh one even said to me in a thread "nobody ever does that" when I warned him about the consequences.

shrugs.

I really want some players who say they want to commit such bad deeds to get a comeuppance.I really really do.

Extreme , psychotic or fanatic ? Applies as much to players as it does to any possible Inquisitor or so it seems.

Cameron Lee did mention freedom but freedom can come with a hefty price tag so we'll see where it all goes.

They should not have put in "inquisition" in the title then, the bloodiest piece of medieval history perpetrated on mankind.  Those "inquisitors" were "sadist" in the purest form!! 

[Siegdrifa]

Bizantura wrote...

Angrywolves wrote...

uh didn't we have that will the blood mage thread ?

Amazes me some players want to commit genocide, spill buckets of blood and do other unsavory things in DAI and actually believe Gaider would write that in.
And if he did, they want to completely ignore all that has been said about consequences in the game from Laidlaw and hints that the other party members can turn against the Inquisitor and either leave or try to kill the Inquisitor.
Certain players seem to want to completely ignore that.

Oh one even said to me in a thread "nobody ever does that" when I warned him about the consequences.

shrugs.

I really want some players who say they want to commit such bad deeds to get a comeuppance.I really really do.

Extreme , psychotic or fanatic ? Applies as much to players as it does to any possible Inquisitor or so it seems.

Cameron Lee did mention freedom but freedom can come with a hefty price tag so we'll see where it all goes.

They should not have put in "inquisition" in the title then, the bloodiest piece of medieval history perpetrated on mankind.  Those "inquisitors" were "sadist" in the purest form!! 

Mostly legend and anticlerical propaganda.

During the witch hunt in middle age, the near clerical authority you were, the less witch hunt you had, the farther away you were, from clerical authority, the more witch hunt you got.
The clerical authority was keeping people in line from this crazyness.

Modifié par Siegdrifa, 15 janvier 2014 - 04:28 .

[Angrywolves]

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

Angrywolves wrote...

uh didn't we have that will the blood mage thread ?

Amazes me some players want to commit genocide, spill buckets of blood and do other unsavory things in DAI and actually believe Gaider would write that in.

He did in Origins. Amazes me that you would ignore that.

And if he did, they want to completely ignore all that has been said about consequences in the game from Laidlaw and hints that the other party members can turn against the Inquisitor and either leave or try to kill the Inquisitor.
Certain players seem to want to completely ignore that.

Oh one even said to me in a thread "nobody ever does that" when I warned him about the consequences.

You can duck them in Origins, at least. Which isn't to say there are none, of course.

On topic: If the game interests me enough for a second playthrough (and if it's anything like Origins, it probably will) that'll probably be my Complete Monster playthrough. (Or as close as the game lets me get.)

The protagonist in Origins didn't.
Oh you could let Redcliff fall and you could help kill the dalish.But the warden didn't commit human sacrifice and you know that.
Be contrary if you wish.

And DAO actions if evil were largely without consequence.We're told there will be consequences in DAI Laidlaw himself has said so.

shrugs.<_<

[Ski Mask Wei]

My first character is always a male human mage who fights for mage freedom. Depending on the stakes, my character will go to the extreme. Maybe DAI can put me in a situation to change my thoughts on the matter but for now my side is chosen and I'm ready for war.

[Giga Drill BREAKER]

I will play play a fair but sarcastic inquisitor.

[Riverdaleswhiteflash]

Angrywolves wrote...

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

Angrywolves wrote...

uh didn't we have that will the blood mage thread ?

Amazes me some players want to commit genocide, spill buckets of blood and do other unsavory things in DAI and actually believe Gaider would write that in.

He did in Origins. Amazes me that you would ignore that.

And if he did, they want to completely ignore all that has been said about consequences in the game from Laidlaw and hints that the other party members can turn against the Inquisitor and either leave or try to kill the Inquisitor.
Certain players seem to want to completely ignore that.

Oh one even said to me in a thread "nobody ever does that" when I warned him about the consequences.

You can duck them in Origins, at least. Which isn't to say there are none, of course.

On topic: If the game interests me enough for a second playthrough (and if it's anything like Origins, it probably will) that'll probably be my Complete Monster playthrough. (Or as close as the game lets me get.)

The protagonist in Origins didn't.
Oh you could let Redcliff fall and you could help kill the dalish.But the warden didn't commit human sacrifice and you know that.

No. You just enable Branka to do so and force Caladrius.

And DAO actions if evil were largely without consequence.We're told there will be consequences in DAI Laidlaw himself has said so.

shrugs.<_<

There were consequences to them occasionally. Though if there are more I'd say that's a step in the right direction.

[Yendor_Trawz]

I will mostly use Fear...and Surprise...and...

[Vilegrim]

Angrywolves wrote...

uh didn't we have that will the blood mage thread ?

Amazes me some players want to commit genocide, spill buckets of blood and do other unsavory things in DAI and actually believe Gaider would write that in.
And if he did, they want to completely ignore all that has been said about consequences in the game from Laidlaw and hints that the other party members can turn against the Inquisitor and either leave or try to kill the Inquisitor.
Certain players seem to want to completely ignore that.

Oh one even said to me in a thread "nobody ever does that" when I warned him about the consequences.

shrugs.

I really want some players who say they want to commit such bad deeds to get a comeuppance.I really really do.

Extreme , psychotic or fanatic ? Applies as much to players as it does to any possible Inquisitor or so it seems.

Cameron Lee did mention freedom but freedom can come with a hefty price tag so we'll see where it all goes.

If the world burns for my choices so be it. No compromise, no weakness, no remorse.  I am the Inquisitor, my enemies will be cleansed by torture and flame, any who stand with the Chantry WILL BE CLEANSED by the rack and the flame.

Modifié par Vilegrim, 15 janvier 2014 - 03:17 .

[Aggie Punbot]

AtreiyaN7 wrote...

Not really - I deal with enough fanatics/nuts on the job as it is. I want to be the sane, rational Inquisitor.

I like this human; she understands me. <3

I am going to go through the game being as nice and saccharinely sweet as is possible . . . unless I have the chance to right a wrong. In that case, off come the kid gloves!

Modifié par TS2Aggie, 15 janvier 2014 - 10:17 .

[Angrywolves]

Vilegrim wrote...

Angrywolves wrote...

uh didn't we have that will the blood mage thread ?

Amazes me some players want to commit genocide, spill buckets of blood and do other unsavory things in DAI and actually believe Gaider would write that in.
And if he did, they want to completely ignore all that has been said about consequences in the game from Laidlaw and hints that the other party members can turn against the Inquisitor and either leave or try to kill the Inquisitor.
Certain players seem to want to completely ignore that.

Oh one even said to me in a thread "nobody ever does that" when I warned him about the consequences.

shrugs.

I really want some players who say they want to commit such bad deeds to get a comeuppance.I really really do.

Extreme , psychotic or fanatic ? Applies as much to players as it does to any possible Inquisitor or so it seems.

Cameron Lee did mention freedom but freedom can come with a hefty price tag so we'll see where it all goes.

If the world burns for my choices so be it. No compromise, no weakness, no remorse.  I am the Inquisitor, my enemies will be cleansed by torture and flame, any who stand with the Chantry WILL BE CLEANSED by the rack and the flame.

well ROTFL fella.

This Inquisition isn't the Spanish Inqusition, isn't like Italy under the Medici's, isn't like Mexico under the Aztecs, Romania under Vlad the Impaler aka Dracula, OR Any similar situation.
Sure some players would like to play the game that way and I say let them.Let them. Let them have their fun.

[AmRMa]

I always want to try playing an extreme character or a blood mage but I always make the good guy decisions because I always want to get the best possible result from a decision.

[Dr. Doctor]

We'll probably be a lot nicer than the 40k Inquisition, but good doesn't always equal nice..

[DarthLaxian]

well, as i don't roleplay (in the classic sense - meaning: giving the character a set piece of rules to live by and having a fixed personality etc. that even overrides what you yourself think is good or not), i will not do that (!)

i would say i am no psycho, i am fairly reasonable and mild-mannered (unless someone pisses me off or gives me a bad vibe - or belongs to people i dislike), i will strive for balance (in favour of the underdog - in the mage/templar-war, that is clearly the mages IMHO) and not kill needlessly etc.

it is just not my style (and even if i did roleplay, i prob. would not play someone who makes me want to puke!)

greetings LAX

[Hurbster]

IF I get this game then I want to play as someone who is nice to everyone. Just to see if Bioware will let me.

[Naesaki]

I always like to be the guy who ends up being a case of "Beware the Nice Ones"

[leaguer of one]

So....I take it this is he topic to find all the people we need to take their murder knives from?

[Lulupab]

leaguer of one wrote...

So....I take it this is he topic to find all the people we need to take their murder knives from?

My mage will not need a knife. I'm going to magically remove their spine and show it to them in the few seconds they have left before they die cause of horrifying pain.

[Jorji Costava]

I'd rather have a look at all the potential PC backgrounds before I definitively decide what kind of character I would want to play. If I plan from the beginning to play a ruthless human rogue, and then it turns out that the human rogue background is something like, "You grew up on a puppy farm," then my plans will be shot to hell before I even get started. Obviously that's an exaggerated example, but hopefully the basic idea makes sense. I'd prefer to tailor the PC's personality around the background, rather than come up with a complete personality set in stone and then hope it fits the available backgrounds.

[Yggdrasil]

I always play some variation of the goody two shoes (I.e. helps/saves everybody) hero type, but I have to admit what little we know about the games certainly seems to indicate that a extreme/psycho/fanatical (i.e. no holds barred & the end totally justifies the means) Inquisitor would be a totally viable way to go. The world has literally gone to hell, and it's your job to clean up the mess. I can see the Inquisitor having no patience for anyone's myopic BS or consideration for collateral damage.

osbornep wrote...

I'd rather have a look at all the potential PC backgrounds before I definitively decide what kind of character I would want to play. If I plan from the beginning to play a ruthless human rogue, and then it turns out that the human rogue background is something like, "You grew up on a puppy farm," then my plans will be shot to hell before I even get started. Obviously that's an exaggerated example, but hopefully the basic idea makes sense. I'd prefer to tailor the PC's personality around the background, rather than come up with a complete personality set in stone and then hope it fits the available backgrounds.

This totally cracked me up! 

"An evil puppy farm?" --Dr. Evil

Modifié par MichaelStJohn90068, 16 janvier 2014 - 01:58 .