eluvianix wrote...
What you linked us to does not deny that Vengeance could possess the corpse.
http://katiebour.tum...t-resource-this
I wanna feel sorry for anders but bloody hades he's an idiot
Modifié par Girlgoten, 21 janvier 2014 - 12:42 .
eluvianix wrote...
What you linked us to does not deny that Vengeance could possess the corpse.
Modifié par Girlgoten, 21 janvier 2014 - 12:42 .
Mages don't just "lose it for a second." And even if they did, Sten did that very thing, and he doesn't even HAVE magic.General TSAR wrote...
Wow, that's a terrible comparison.Orian Tabris wrote...
The point of the comparison is that mages are known to cause death and destruction. Terrorists do the same.
Terrorists require planning, indoc, and materials to cause death and destruction on a wide scale, Mages don't, in fact they can just lose it for a second and kill an entire village.
AresKeith wrote...
Rassler wrote...
Say someone kills your brother and you find the murderer and kill him. Its Justice right? But is also Vengeance? It is.
No, that isn't Justice. That is full on Vengeance
General TSAR wrote...
Justice is capturing the murderer alive and letting the powers that be decide his faith.
It's quarantine to put mages through the Harrowing. To keep them locked up afterwards is to percecute them.General TSAR wrote...
It's not persecution, it's quarantine.Orian Tabris wrote...
Oh, so that makes it OK to persecute someone for something they might do?
Rassler wrote...
Actually your expectations are too low because you just made it very obvious you never romanced/friend Anders and never kept him alive. Because the Anders who talks to you before final battle is NOTHING close to a lunatic or a beast. He is changed, almost as if awakening Anders is back, but more serious.
The emotion Justice is very complicated even on its purest form. Say someone kills your brother and you find the murderer and kill him. Its Justice right? But is also Vengeance? It is
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 21 janvier 2014 - 12:47 .
Do you not understand the concept of quarantine?Orian Tabris wrote...
It's quarantine to put mages through the Harrowing. To keep them locked up afterwards is to percecute them.
Don't put words in my mouth Anders fanboy.Rassler wrote...
The powers? Hmm, you mean the Iranian government is an ideal power to determine what is Justice and what is Vengeance?
Modifié par General TSAR, 21 janvier 2014 - 12:52 .
Dave of Canada wrote...
Rassler wrote...
Actually your expectations are too low because you just made it very obvious you never romanced/friend Anders and never kept him alive. Because the Anders who talks to you before final battle is NOTHING close to a lunatic or a beast. He is changed, almost as if awakening Anders is back, but more serious.
I've actually done both Anders routes.
Friendship Anders is a lunatic, just because he's fighting some "cause" he thinks is righteous doesn't mean he isn't insane. His logic is incomprehensible, he's merged too much with Vengeance that "Anders" as a personality has ceased to be. Give it time and he's just going to get worse.
Rivalry leads to a ravenous beast, Anders has to keep Vengeance back or he'd be killing everything nearby during the Rivalry finale. He wanted to get rid of Vengeance, he wants help but he can't control himself from Vengeance who's imposing itself on him.
Dave of Canada wrote...
That's flat out vengeance. Killing someone because they did something to you causes a non-stop loop of constant need for vengeance, proper justice through the authorities wouldn't cause such a thing.
Rassler wrote...
AresKeith wrote...
Rassler wrote...
Say someone kills your brother and you find the murderer and kill him. Its Justice right? But is also Vengeance? It is.
No, that isn't Justice. That is full on Vengeance
The line between Justice and Vengeance almost doesn't exist. Its not full Vengeance, in many countries the punishment for killing someone with full conscious is death.
God himself has taken Vengeance upon mankind a lot of times. Though when Vengeance is holy its called "Retribution".
People kill and kill in the name of Justice, until it becomes mass murder and becomes a Vendetta. Everyone killing everyone for a simple grudge.
Orian Tabris wrote...
Mages don't just "lose it for a second." And even if they did, Sten did that very thing, and he doesn't even HAVE magic.General TSAR wrote...
Wow, that's a terrible comparison.Orian Tabris wrote...
The point of the comparison is that mages are known to cause death and destruction. Terrorists do the same.
Terrorists require planning, indoc, and materials to cause death and destruction on a wide scale, Mages don't, in fact they can just lose it for a second and kill an entire village.
Mages are born as mages, Iraqis are born as Iraqis. So saying that mages need to be locked up or dead because of the potential for them to kill is like saying Iraqis have the potential to kill, so they need the same treatment. Not every Iraqi is a terrorist, not every mage is evil or weak enough to try to kill people, or become an abomination.
The bottomline with my comparison, is that assuming someone is dangerous because of who they are, is injust. The end doesn't necessarily justify the means, not everyone should be painted witht he same brush.
I having nothing against the Chantry/templar practices on mages, but everyone deserves the right to live.
General TSAR wrote...
You knucklehead.
Sten butchered a household, not an entire village, and why the hell are you bring up Iraqi born jihadists? Is your skull cracked worse than mother thought?Do you not understand the concept of quarantine?Orian Tabris wrote...
It's quarantine to put mages through the Harrowing. To keep them locked up afterwards is to percecute them.Don't put words in my mouth Anders fanboy.Rassler wrote...
The powers? Hmm, you mean the Iranian government is an ideal power to determine what is Justice and what is Vengeance?
It's funny that he tried to make Terrorism into an ethnic thing people are born into.XxDeonxX wrote...
My god... did you just write that or am I imagining a cloud of the most idiotic comparison I have ever read before me?
Modifié par General TSAR, 21 janvier 2014 - 01:01 .
Your example IS vegeance.Rassler wrote...
AresKeith wrote...
Rassler wrote...
Say someone kills your brother and you find the murderer and kill him. Its Justice right? But is also Vengeance? It is.
No, that isn't Justice. That is full on Vengeance
The line between Justice and Vengeance almost doesn't exist. Its not full Vengeance, in many countries the punishment for killing someone with full conscious is death.
God himself has taken Vengeance upon mankind a lot of times. Though when Vengeance is holy its called "Retribution".
People kill and kill in the name of Justice, until it becomes mass murder and becomes a Vendetta. Everyone killing everyone for a simple grudge.
Yeah!....I think.CybAnt1 wrote...
You can have Justice without Vengeance, but you can't have Vengeance without Justice.
AresKeith wrote...
Yes there is a line between Justice and Vengeance, you just don't wanna see it
Vengeance is a negative emotion which helps form demons or corrupt spirits into demons
What?Rassler wrote...
Justice sometimes involves killing, it always has.
'Course you can! Justice and vengeance are two different paths down the same road.CybAnt1 wrote...
You can have Justice without Vengeance, but you can't have Vengeance without Justice.
Modifié par Orian Tabris, 21 janvier 2014 - 01:07 .
For you, perhaps, it might be difficult to tell the difference. When you are an objective bystander, one can easily tell the difference between Justice and Vengeance. Isabela's right that can get muddy, but that doesn't mean there is a very big difference between Justice, which is objective retribution, versus Vengeance, which is entirely subjective.Rassler wrote...
AresKeith wrote...
Yes there is a line between Justice and Vengeance, you just don't wanna see it
Vengeance is a negative emotion which helps form demons or corrupt spirits into demons
Vengeance no matter how negative is a necessary emotion. Its too hard to tell the difference between Vengeance and Justice. Justice sometimes involves killing, it always has.
Anders: There is justice in the world.
Isabela: Is there? You want to free the mages. Let's say you do, but to get there, you kill a bunch of innocent people.
Isabela: What about them? Don't they then deserve justice?
Anders: Yes.
Isabela: And then what? Where does it end?
Isabela: It's like a bar brawl. People are continuously pulled into the fray, and nobody remembers why it started.
Isabela: Justice is an idea. It makes sense in a world of ideas, but not in our world.
Justice doesn't exist in the first place and when it rare cases it does it is intertwined with Vengeance.
I actually kind of agree with him here. Things like death penalty, etc.General TSAR wrote...
What?Rassler wrote...
Justice sometimes involves killing, it always has.
Rassler wrote...
AresKeith wrote...
Yes there is a line between Justice and Vengeance, you just don't wanna see it
Vengeance is a negative emotion which helps form demons or corrupt spirits into demons
Vengeance no matter how negative is a necessary emotion. Its too hard to tell the difference between Vengeance and Justice. Justice sometimes involves killing, it always has.
Anders: There is justice in the world.
Isabela: Is there? You want to free the mages. Let's say you do, but to get there, you kill a bunch of innocent people.
Isabela: What about them? Don't they then deserve justice?
Anders: Yes.
Isabela: And then what? Where does it end?
Isabela: It's like a bar brawl. People are continuously pulled into the fray, and nobody remembers why it started.
Isabela: Justice is an idea. It makes sense in a world of ideas, but not in our world.
Justice doesn't exist in the first place and when it rare cases it does it is intertwined with Vengeance.
Ah. Mea culpa.General TSAR wrote...
No, the way he worded it.
Insulting? Who could POSSIBLY be insulted by this?Mr.House wrote...
edited: removed inflammatory comment ~Mod05Orian Tabris wrote...
Mages don't just "lose it for a second." And even if they did, Sten did that very thing, and he doesn't even HAVE magic.General TSAR wrote...
Wow, that's a terrible comparison.Orian Tabris wrote...
The point of the comparison is that mages are known to cause death and destruction. Terrorists do the same.
Terrorists require planning, indoc, and materials to cause death and destruction on a wide scale, Mages don't, in fact they can just lose it for a second and kill an entire village.
Mages are born as mages, Iraqis are born as Iraqis. So saying that mages need to be locked up or dead because of the potential for them to kill is like saying Iraqis have the potential to kill, so they need the same treatment. Not every Iraqi is a terrorist, not every mage is evil or weak enough to try to kill people, or become an abomination.
The bottomline with my comparison, is that assuming someone is dangerous because of who they are, is injust. The end doesn't necessarily justify the means, not everyone should be painted witht he same brush.
I having nothing against the Chantry/templar practices on mages, but everyone deserves the right to live.
Modifié par BioWareMod05, 21 janvier 2014 - 03:54 .