Aller au contenu

Photo

The Dalish Need an Image Boost


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
1258 réponses à ce sujet

#551
BlankPage

BlankPage
  • Members
  • 65 messages

cjones91 wrote...

BlankPage wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

Vandicus wrote...

cjones91 wrote...
Oh that's rich..... who have the elves oppressed?And just like my earlier post about the subject you are using a biased version of the events to lay all of the blame on the Dalish when it could've happened in a number of ways.


 Zathrian, Velanna, random elves in the Dalish storyline, to answer your question about oppressors. I can list individuals from every race in Thedas who've oppressed people. I'm not giving any of them a free pass.

I'm blaming the Dalish for being incompetent, not for immoral acts of conquest. They lost because of poor decision making in thinking that ignoring Tevinter was the best way to deal with them. Of course they'd lose the war. Tevinter had as much time as they wanted to prepare, since the elves would never attack them. The elves waited until the evil mage supremacist slavers were ready to destroy them. Its idiotic to fight on the enemy's terms, but the elves gave them centuries to prepare.

If your only examples of oppression are of characters who never did anything to oppress others then you don't know the meaning of the word.If a elf does'nt agree with the Keeper then he/she is free to leave and fiind another clan,if the Dalish were oppressors like you claim then that would'nt happen.


*Achem* What? You're not serious right? 

Zathrian, a keeper of his clan, had his daughter raped and his son killed. By humans. What does he do in return? Turns the entire village of where those men came from into werewolves for the rest of eternity. Did those guilty deserve their fate? Probably. Did those innocent do anything wrong? 

Google defines Oppression as "prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control." Would turning an entire village of innocents into werewolves qualify to you as "prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control." Because it does to me. But, what about the other example? Velanna? Her sister was taken by darkspawn. She blames humans (Wrongly) and beings to murder any human that walks on the road near her clan. HOW is that not cruel and wrong to you? Literally killing innocents. Even if it were true and humans had taken her sister (Which is totally wasn't) still wouldn't authorize her to kill any passing humans. 

Or! Maybe we should talk about Tamlen! Who suggest killing three humans for simply being near him. Dalish never opress! No way! <_<

So you have three dalish elves who fit the technical term of oppression....big deal.Vandicus implied the Dalish as a whole are oppressors not just a small number of them.To me oppression is taking over a town and turning it into a slave camp.Oppression to me is what cults do where they control their followers through threats of phyiscal harm or death if they try to leave,that is oppression.


Okay, so turning an entire village into vicious monsters who hurt their  loved ones and blindly kill anything that moves. Causing obvious pain and torture. That's not opression to you. But making them slaves is. 

#552
Vandicus

Vandicus
  • Members
  • 2 426 messages

cjones91 wrote...

BlankPage wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

Vandicus wrote...

cjones91 wrote...
Oh that's rich..... who have the elves oppressed?And just like my earlier post about the subject you are using a biased version of the events to lay all of the blame on the Dalish when it could've happened in a number of ways.


 Zathrian, Velanna, random elves in the Dalish storyline, to answer your question about oppressors. I can list individuals from every race in Thedas who've oppressed people. I'm not giving any of them a free pass.

I'm blaming the Dalish for being incompetent, not for immoral acts of conquest. They lost because of poor decision making in thinking that ignoring Tevinter was the best way to deal with them. Of course they'd lose the war. Tevinter had as much time as they wanted to prepare, since the elves would never attack them. The elves waited until the evil mage supremacist slavers were ready to destroy them. Its idiotic to fight on the enemy's terms, but the elves gave them centuries to prepare.

If your only examples of oppression are of characters who never did anything to oppress others then you don't know the meaning of the word.If a elf does'nt agree with the Keeper then he/she is free to leave and fiind another clan,if the Dalish were oppressors like you claim then that would'nt happen.


*Achem* What? You're not serious right? 

Zathrian, a keeper of his clan, had his daughter raped and his son killed. By humans. What does he do in return? Turns the entire village of where those men came from into werewolves for the rest of eternity. Did those guilty deserve their fate? Probably. Did those innocent do anything wrong? 

Google defines Oppression as "prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control." Would turning an entire village of innocents into werewolves qualify to you as "prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control." Because it does to me. But, what about the other example? Velanna? Her sister was taken by darkspawn. She blames humans (Wrongly) and beings to murder any human that walks on the road near her clan. HOW is that not cruel and wrong to you? Literally killing innocents. +Even if it were true and humans had taken her sister (Which is totally wasn't) still wouldn't authorize her to kill any passing humans. 

Or! Maybe we should talk about Tamlen! Who suggest killing three humans for simply being near him. Dalish never opress! No way! <_<

So you have three dalish elves who fit the technical term of oppression....big deal.Vandicus implied the Dalish as a whole are oppressors not just a small number of them.To me oppression is taking over a town and turning it into a slave camp.Oppression to me is what cults do where they control their followers through threats of phyiscal harm or death if they try to leave,that is oppression.


What?

dragondreamer was claiming that we were giving a free pass to all the other oppressive groups in Thedas by strawmanning. My objection was that I have given a free pass to no one, I've condemned all the oppressors in Thedas, and that the only oppressors that have been given a free pass thus far were members of the Dalish.

I'm not trying to claim that the Dalish are particularly immortal by the standards in Thedas. They are however,  impractically racist against their own kind as well as humans(there's racism and then there's letting racism keep you from benefitting your own people, the Dalish definitely fall in the latter half by this point). The only group that appears to deserve greater respect are the City Elves, particularly the ones overthrowing Orlais right now. The City Elves saw their two options of assimilate or using force, and are trying them in order to achieve progress. The Dalish ran away and live as vagabonds. They aren't heroic rebels. They aren't even regularly oppressed, they live on their own. Its the City Elves who deal with hardship in trying to prosper.

#553
TK514

TK514
  • Members
  • 3 794 messages

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...
So you have three dalish elves who fit the technical term of oppression....big deal.Vandicus implied the Dalish as a whole are oppressors not just a small number of them.To me oppression is taking over a town and turning it into a slave camp.Oppression to me is what cults do where they control their followers through threats of phyiscal harm or death if they try to leave,that is oppression.


It is facinating to watch you change the goalposts.

How am I changing goalposts?I'm not the one who claimed all Dalish were oppressive and tried to bring three weak examples of that being the case.


'Weak'.  Heh.  You wanted examples, and examples were provided.  So suddenly those examples are 'weak' or 'don't count'.

I also enjoyed an earlier post where you said the Dalish leadership didn't oppress their people, and in the same paragraph stated that anyone who disagreed with the Keeper was free to accept exile.

Modifié par TK514, 19 janvier 2014 - 06:37 .


#554
cjones91

cjones91
  • Members
  • 2 812 messages

HiroVoid wrote...

From what we can gather, each Dalish tribe tends to have different attitudes and ways of doing things, so it's pretty impossible to label all the Dalish as much as anything aside from Nomadic and other terms.

To me oppression is taking over a town and turning it into a slave camp.

Turning a town into werewolf monsters for generations to be passed down to their offspring would probably be a similar comparison then.

It would be similiar but not valid,Zatharian did'nt enslave the werewolves and make them do things for his clan while controlling them through the fact that he's the only one who can break their curse.

#555
Vandicus

Vandicus
  • Members
  • 2 426 messages

BlankPage wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

BlankPage wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

Vandicus wrote...

cjones91 wrote...
Oh that's rich..... who have the elves oppressed?And just like my earlier post about the subject you are using a biased version of the events to lay all of the blame on the Dalish when it could've happened in a number of ways.


 Zathrian, Velanna, random elves in the Dalish storyline, to answer your question about oppressors. I can list individuals from every race in Thedas who've oppressed people. I'm not giving any of them a free pass.

I'm blaming the Dalish for being incompetent, not for immoral acts of conquest. They lost because of poor decision making in thinking that ignoring Tevinter was the best way to deal with them. Of course they'd lose the war. Tevinter had as much time as they wanted to prepare, since the elves would never attack them. The elves waited until the evil mage supremacist slavers were ready to destroy them. Its idiotic to fight on the enemy's terms, but the elves gave them centuries to prepare.

If your only examples of oppression are of characters who never did anything to oppress others then you don't know the meaning of the word.If a elf does'nt agree with the Keeper then he/she is free to leave and fiind another clan,if the Dalish were oppressors like you claim then that would'nt happen.


*Achem* What? You're not serious right? 

Zathrian, a keeper of his clan, had his daughter raped and his son killed. By humans. What does he do in return? Turns the entire village of where those men came from into werewolves for the rest of eternity. Did those guilty deserve their fate? Probably. Did those innocent do anything wrong? 

Google defines Oppression as "prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control." Would turning an entire village of innocents into werewolves qualify to you as "prolonged cruel or unjust treatment or control." Because it does to me. But, what about the other example? Velanna? Her sister was taken by darkspawn. She blames humans (Wrongly) and beings to murder any human that walks on the road near her clan. HOW is that not cruel and wrong to you? Literally killing innocents. Even if it were true and humans had taken her sister (Which is totally wasn't) still wouldn't authorize her to kill any passing humans. 

Or! Maybe we should talk about Tamlen! Who suggest killing three humans for simply being near him. Dalish never opress! No way! <_<

So you have three dalish elves who fit the technical term of oppression....big deal.Vandicus implied the Dalish as a whole are oppressors not just a small number of them.To me oppression is taking over a town and turning it into a slave camp.Oppression to me is what cults do where they control their followers through threats of phyiscal harm or death if they try to leave,that is oppression.


Okay, so turning an entire village into vicious monsters who hurt their  loved ones and blindly kill anything that moves. Causing obvious pain and torture. That's not opression to you. But making them slaves is. 


Well by his definition the Orlesians didn't oppress the elves, only the Tevinter have, since they're the only country that utilizes slavery.

#556
cjones91

cjones91
  • Members
  • 2 812 messages

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...
So you have three dalish elves who fit the technical term of oppression....big deal.Vandicus implied the Dalish as a whole are oppressors not just a small number of them.To me oppression is taking over a town and turning it into a slave camp.Oppression to me is what cults do where they control their followers through threats of phyiscal harm or death if they try to leave,that is oppression.


It is facinating to watch you change the goalposts.

How am I changing goalposts?I'm not the one who claimed all Dalish were oppressive and tried to bring three weak examples of that being the case.


'Weak'.  Heh.  You wanted examples, and examples were provided.  So suddenly those examples are 'weak' or 'don't count'.

I also enjoyed an earlier post where you said the Dalish leadership
didn't oppress their people, and in the same paragraph stated that
anyone who disagreed with the Keeper was free to accept exile.

No,I said any elf who disagreed with the Keeper can choose to leave and find another clan as a counterpoint for why calling the Dalish oppressive is incorrect.If that were the case then no Dalish would be free to leave unless the Keeper said so.

#557
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

dragondreamer wrote...
Apparently it's also okay for dwarves to oppress their lower social classes because humans do it too.  But elves who live in separate societies occasionally bad mouthing each other makes them monsters who deserve what they get.  


Find me one post where I said this. In fact, find me one post where anyone said this. 

What I hope to see happen in DA:I or even Masked Empire is for the Dalish to play a role in winning the civil war for Empress.  If they can regain the Dales through a newly established relationship with Orlais they might have a better chance keeping it, especially with the Chantry crumbling from its former power.  And I imagine Ferelden would support having a buffer between them and Orlais.


That would be exactry what people like myself and Fast Jimmy are arguing for - that the Dalish, if they want to actually secure a future for themselves and their homeland, have to find some way to integrate themselves into Thedas, by building alliances and a general power-base. 

Like what the CEs are doing by throwing in with Gaspard. 

And no one's discussed this at all, but if Arlathan is rediscovered, I wonder if it's possible to reestablish it.  It might be a bad idea for several reasons; there's likely some unspeakable horror in the place (it's almost mandatory -- even without magic involved there's no way there isn't a massive veil rip there, a very old one), and they'd be neighbors with the people who destroyed it in the first place, as well as the Qunari.  So even if the place itself could be reinhabited, the neighbors are the worst possible for a fledgling nation.  Still, I wonder, since I imagine a place that's been lost for ages would be empty real estate. 


I've never understood the focus on the Dales, personally, when the true lost homeland of the elves is Arlathan. 

#558
TK514

TK514
  • Members
  • 3 794 messages

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...
So you have three dalish elves who fit the technical term of oppression....big deal.Vandicus implied the Dalish as a whole are oppressors not just a small number of them.To me oppression is taking over a town and turning it into a slave camp.Oppression to me is what cults do where they control their followers through threats of phyiscal harm or death if they try to leave,that is oppression.


It is facinating to watch you change the goalposts.

How am I changing goalposts?I'm not the one who claimed all Dalish were oppressive and tried to bring three weak examples of that being the case.


'Weak'.  Heh.  You wanted examples, and examples were provided.  So suddenly those examples are 'weak' or 'don't count'.

I also enjoyed an earlier post where you said the Dalish leadership
didn't oppress their people, and in the same paragraph stated that
anyone who disagreed with the Keeper was free to accept exile.

No,I said any elf who disagreed with the Keeper can choose to leave and find another clan as a counterpoint for why calling the Dalish oppressive is incorrect.If that were the case then no Dalish would be free to leave unless the Keeper said so.


Exactly.  Exile.  "If you don't like what I have to say, then rather than allow debate and free expression, your choices are to stay and do what I tell you or leave your home."

#559
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages

Medhia Nox wrote...

Time for the Dalish to invest in the lyirum trade.


Any trade would be good. But as we saw in DA2 dalish dont like selling things to filthy shems for money like every other sensible race and nation does.

#560
cjones91

cjones91
  • Members
  • 2 812 messages

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...
So you have three dalish elves who fit the technical term of oppression....big deal.Vandicus implied the Dalish as a whole are oppressors not just a small number of them.To me oppression is taking over a town and turning it into a slave camp.Oppression to me is what cults do where they control their followers through threats of phyiscal harm or death if they try to leave,that is oppression.


It is facinating to watch you change the goalposts.

How am I changing goalposts?I'm not the one who claimed all Dalish were oppressive and tried to bring three weak examples of that being the case.


'Weak'.  Heh.  You wanted examples, and examples were provided.  So suddenly those examples are 'weak' or 'don't count'.

I also enjoyed an earlier post where you said the Dalish leadership
didn't oppress their people, and in the same paragraph stated that
anyone who disagreed with the Keeper was free to accept exile.

No,I said any elf who disagreed with the Keeper can choose to leave and find another clan as a counterpoint for why calling the Dalish oppressive is incorrect.If that were the case then no Dalish would be free to leave unless the Keeper said so.


Exactly.  Exile.  "If you don't like what I have to say, then rather than allow debate and free expression, your choices are to stay and do what I tell you or leave your home."

Exactly it's a clanmember's choice,Velanna disagreed with her Keeper on how to deal with humans so she left with her sister and several other Dalish.If the Dalish were really oppressive then nobody would be allowed to leave.

Modifié par cjones91, 19 janvier 2014 - 06:47 .


#561
Vandicus

Vandicus
  • Members
  • 2 426 messages

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...
So you have three dalish elves who fit the technical term of oppression....big deal.Vandicus implied the Dalish as a whole are oppressors not just a small number of them.To me oppression is taking over a town and turning it into a slave camp.Oppression to me is what cults do where they control their followers through threats of phyiscal harm or death if they try to leave,that is oppression.


It is facinating to watch you change the goalposts.

How am I changing goalposts?I'm not the one who claimed all Dalish were oppressive and tried to bring three weak examples of that being the case.


'Weak'.  Heh.  You wanted examples, and examples were provided.  So suddenly those examples are 'weak' or 'don't count'.

I also enjoyed an earlier post where you said the Dalish leadership
didn't oppress their people, and in the same paragraph stated that
anyone who disagreed with the Keeper was free to accept exile.

No,I said any elf who disagreed with the Keeper can choose to leave and find another clan as a counterpoint for why calling the Dalish oppressive is incorrect.If that were the case then no Dalish would be free to leave unless the Keeper said so.


Exactly.  Exile.  "If you don't like what I have to say, then rather than allow debate and free expression, your choices are to stay and do what I tell you or leave your home."

Except it's a choice,Velanna disagreed with her Keeper on how to deal with humans so she left with her sister and several other Dalish.If the Dalish were really oppressive then nobody would be allowed to leave.


If the Orlesians were really oppressive then nobody would be allowed to leave. 

#562
Mistic

Mistic
  • Members
  • 2 199 messages

In Exile wrote...

I've never understood the focus on the Dales, personally, when the true lost homeland of the elves is Arlathan. 


I suppose it's because Arlatahn was sunken, so it's of no use to anyone. Still, why do so many people mix the Dalish with the ancient Elves from Arlathan? Even the current nomadic Dalish have little thing to do with the Dales.

#563
Vandicus

Vandicus
  • Members
  • 2 426 messages

Misticsan wrote...

In Exile wrote...

I've never understood the focus on the Dales, personally, when the true lost homeland of the elves is Arlathan. 


I suppose it's because Arlatahn was sunken, so it's of no use to anyone. Still, why do so many people mix the Dalish with the ancient Elves from Arlathan? Even the current nomadic Dalish have little thing to do with the Dales.


Mostly because of their desire to repeat history.

Arlathan fell because of isolationism.
The Dales fell because of isolationism.
The modern Dalish are in love with the idea of isolationism. Gee, I wonder how this will turn out.

#564
cjones91

cjones91
  • Members
  • 2 812 messages

Vandicus wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...
So you have three dalish elves who fit the technical term of oppression....big deal.Vandicus implied the Dalish as a whole are oppressors not just a small number of them.To me oppression is taking over a town and turning it into a slave camp.Oppression to me is what cults do where they control their followers through threats of phyiscal harm or death if they try to leave,that is oppression.


It is facinating to watch you change the goalposts.

How am I changing goalposts?I'm not the one who claimed all Dalish were oppressive and tried to bring three weak examples of that being the case.


'Weak'.  Heh.  You wanted examples, and examples were provided.  So suddenly those examples are 'weak' or 'don't count'.

I also enjoyed an earlier post where you said the Dalish leadership
didn't oppress their people, and in the same paragraph stated that
anyone who disagreed with the Keeper was free to accept exile.

No,I said any elf who disagreed with the Keeper can choose to leave and find another clan as a counterpoint for why calling the Dalish oppressive is incorrect.If that were the case then no Dalish would be free to leave unless the Keeper said so.


Exactly.  Exile.  "If you don't like what I have to say, then rather than allow debate and free expression, your choices are to stay and do what I tell you or leave your home."

Except it's a choice,Velanna disagreed with her Keeper on how to deal with humans so she left with her sister and several other Dalish.If the Dalish were really oppressive then nobody would be allowed to leave.


If the Orlesians were really oppressive then nobody would be allowed to leave. 

it's funny how you bring them up since Fereldan had to forcibly kick them out during their occupation.:whistle:

#565
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

cjones91 wrote...
It would be similiar but not valid,Zatharian did'nt enslave the werewolves and make them do things for his clan while controlling them through the fact that he's the only one who can break their curse.


Zathrian wanted to curse their children for all time to be mindless monsters. It's not just slavery, it's like keeping a village in a state of perpetual torture, allowing them to have kids, and then starting to torture those kids. What he did is beyond sick and twisted. It's one thing to want to kill the people who did what they did to his family - that's arguably justice, if tinged with revenge. But what he did went far, far beyond that. 

#566
cjones91

cjones91
  • Members
  • 2 812 messages

Vandicus wrote...

Misticsan wrote...

In Exile wrote...

I've never understood the focus on the Dales, personally, when the true lost homeland of the elves is Arlathan. 


I suppose it's because Arlatahn was sunken, so it's of no use to anyone. Still, why do so many people mix the Dalish with the ancient Elves from Arlathan? Even the current nomadic Dalish have little thing to do with the Dales.


Mostly because of their desire to repeat history.

Arlathan fell because of isolationism.
The Dales fell because of isolationism.
The modern Dalish are in love with the idea of isolationism. Gee, I wonder how this will turn out.

The Dales and Arlathan fell because of invaders not because of isolationism.

#567
The Elder King

The Elder King
  • Members
  • 19 630 messages
Does someone think that the CE and the dalish might become enemies in the Orlesian Civil war?

#568
Vandicus

Vandicus
  • Members
  • 2 426 messages

cjones91 wrote...

Vandicus wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...

TK514 wrote...

cjones91 wrote...
So you have three dalish elves who fit the technical term of oppression....big deal.Vandicus implied the Dalish as a whole are oppressors not just a small number of them.To me oppression is taking over a town and turning it into a slave camp.Oppression to me is what cults do where they control their followers through threats of phyiscal harm or death if they try to leave,that is oppression.


It is facinating to watch you change the goalposts.

How am I changing goalposts?I'm not the one who claimed all Dalish were oppressive and tried to bring three weak examples of that being the case.


'Weak'.  Heh.  You wanted examples, and examples were provided.  So suddenly those examples are 'weak' or 'don't count'.

I also enjoyed an earlier post where you said the Dalish leadership
didn't oppress their people, and in the same paragraph stated that
anyone who disagreed with the Keeper was free to accept exile.

No,I said any elf who disagreed with the Keeper can choose to leave and find another clan as a counterpoint for why calling the Dalish oppressive is incorrect.If that were the case then no Dalish would be free to leave unless the Keeper said so.


Exactly.  Exile.  "If you don't like what I have to say, then rather than allow debate and free expression, your choices are to stay and do what I tell you or leave your home."

Except it's a choice,Velanna disagreed with her Keeper on how to deal with humans so she left with her sister and several other Dalish.If the Dalish were really oppressive then nobody would be allowed to leave.


If the Orlesians were really oppressive then nobody would be allowed to leave. 

it's funny how you bring them up since Fereldan had to forcibly kick them out during their occupation.:whistle:


You're the only one who uses a definition by which the Orlesians are not considered oppressive. Thedas appears to have no immigration control or laws. The Dalish move freely in and out of the various kingdoms, including Orlais. Actually, the Dalish are largely descendents of elves that left Orlais.

If your definition of oppressive requires that nobody be allowed to leave, then the Orlesians didn't oppress the elves. A notion which I personally find to be absurd, but its your definition.

#569
Mistic

Mistic
  • Members
  • 2 199 messages

Vandicus wrote...

Misticsan wrote...

In Exile wrote...

I've never understood the focus on the Dales, personally, when the true lost homeland of the elves is Arlathan. 


I suppose it's because Arlatahn was sunken, so it's of no use to anyone. Still, why do so many people mix the Dalish with the ancient Elves from Arlathan? Even the current nomadic Dalish have little thing to do with the Dales.


Mostly because of their desire to repeat history.

Arlathan fell because of isolationism.
The Dales fell because of isolationism.
The modern Dalish are in love with the idea of isolationism. Gee, I wonder how this will turn out.


Mm, true. Elves love repeating the same mistakes, don't they? Or maybe there is hope.

One of the things I would like to see in DA:I about the Dalish is the opposition between their two philosophical ways. The famous one and most associated with the Dalish is the Vir Tanadhal, the way of the three trees, but then DA2 came with that reference to the Vir Tasallan, the way of peace. More difficult and much less popular, but maybe a Dalish inquisitor could follow it?

#570
Vandicus

Vandicus
  • Members
  • 2 426 messages

cjones91 wrote...

Vandicus wrote...

Misticsan wrote...

In Exile wrote...

I've never understood the focus on the Dales, personally, when the true lost homeland of the elves is Arlathan. 


I suppose it's because Arlatahn was sunken, so it's of no use to anyone. Still, why do so many people mix the Dalish with the ancient Elves from Arlathan? Even the current nomadic Dalish have little thing to do with the Dales.


Mostly because of their desire to repeat history.

Arlathan fell because of isolationism.
The Dales fell because of isolationism.
The modern Dalish are in love with the idea of isolationism. Gee, I wonder how this will turn out.

The Dales and Arlathan fell because of invaders not because of isolationism.


France fell to Germany in WWII because of invaders, not because of isolationism. :mellow:

The Tevinter Imperium didn't pop up overnight. The Dales didn't have to completely ignore all other nations, leaving them ripe to be invaded. There are ways to keep a country safe from invaders. Isolationism is not one of them.

Ignoring methods to protect oneself is akin to submitting.

#571
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

TK514 wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

I see the reality of Thedas being filled with kingdoms that are intolerant towards the Dalish and the elven religion, and with templars hunt them down. I'm not seeing why that point continually gets glossed over with people who conveniently forget how elves, mages, and heathens are treated by Andrastians.


If the other nations are intolerant of the Dalish, it's because the Dalish have given them no reason to be otherwise.  And the load about Templars hunting Dalish is hogwash.  The Templars don't give a fig about the Dalish.  The Templars hunt Mages, regardless of race.  They aren't picking on those poor stupid Dalish out of some racial or religious bias.  Without harboring mages, it is unlikely roving bands of savages who are doing a passing job of wiping themselves out would ever get a visit from the Templar order.


Well, I trust Merrill explicitly saying that templars hunt down the Dalish. 

I'm also not going to vilify the Dalish as savages for refusing to give up their heritage, or being wary of strangers when they're targets of violence and persecution for their cultural values and their religious beliefs.

TK514 wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

The people who encroach their clans seem to be templars, who pursue them, or even Andrastians threatening the Dalish to convert can happen, as it did with the Sabrae clan. Humans even tried to burn down Velanna's clan. I don't see why that makes the Dalish bad guys.


Really.  The Human Warden was a Templar?  Or a Missionary?  Or trying to burn down the clan?
How about Hawke?  Which of the things you listed was Hawke?  Was the Champion there on a mission of racial intolerance?  Or Duncan.  Clearly Duncan was just an elf hating sociopath, looking for an excuse to kill him some Knife Ears.


Merrill points out that the clans are nomadic because the Dalish are hunted down. Ariane protected her clan from a templar who hunted them down. Velanna's clan faced the wrath of humans who turned to burn them away from their settlement. I'm not seeing anything in your statement that changes those facts.

TK514 wrote...

Or Brother Genetivi.  Here's your evil Chantry man, in the flesh.  So which of those terrible Chantry sins was he there to visit upon the Dalish?  Baby eating, perhaps?  Urinating on their totems?  Maybe he was going to sacrifice their Hallah to the Maker.  Surely, such a man, serving such an evil organization, was up to no good near a Dalish camp.


You mean the man who wrote that humans were the rightful masters of Thedas? I wonder how it would sound if someone said a particular ethnic group were the rightful 'masters' of a specific continent.

TK514 wrote...

No?

Yet in each case, the visitor received unwarranted hostility, if not outright racism, from the Dalish.  Racism that extend to their own people, should someone dare to mingle with humans.

The Dalish can not survive by starting every contact with "Go away, shemlen, or we'll kill you."


Yeah, I recall the sheer racism of the Dalish raising Aveline as one of their own. Or welcoming Feynriel into their clan, and protecting him from templars. Or welcoming Arianni back into the clan. Or signing a treaty to aid non-elves against the Blight.

And considering Mother Hannah has to assure an Amell Warden that a lynch mob won't try to kill him, I'm not going to pretend that the Dalish face no dangers from strangers.

TK514 wrote...

LobselVith8 wrote...

The Dalish are condemned as heathens, and their religion is the main issue in any alliance with an Andrastian nation. I'm not seeing why the entirety of the blame is laid at the feet of the Dalish. I'm certainly hoping the Inquisition affords the protagonist an opportunity to build alliances that can help the Elvhen, as well as dislodging Orlesian power from the Dales.


The Dales are an absurd goal.  You keep demanding that the Dalish should get that specific chunk of land back.  The chunk of land that was stolen from someone else to give to them, and which hasn't been theirs for longer than they lived there.  A land surrounded by Andrastian nations, who you claim will find it impossible to allow them to exist peacefully.


There are rumors of an elven rebellion in the Dales, and a gathering of the Dalish in the Dales is supposed to happen. That's why I bring up the Dales.

TK514 wrote...

So what sane reason would they have for wanting that particular hunk of land back?  There are no great Elven libraries there, or any more lost elf culture than they'd find anywhere else.  Given the neigborhood and the current inhabitants, It's probably the least suitable chunk of land outside of Tevinter.  On the flip side, we have at least three countries that deviate from the White Chantry.  Nevarra has it's own decidedly un-Chantry practices, and Rivain is about as un-Chantry as you can find.  We even know that at one time, there were rumors of the Dalish considering settling on Llomerryn.  And sadly we already know how much support Ferelden would realistically offer to the Elves if push came to shove.


Nevarra follows the faith of Andraste and the kingdom of Rivaini purged the Qunari who converted with their Andrastian and nationalist forces.

TK514 wrote...

So what is it about the Dales that makes the Dalish such idiots?  Just because they were gifted a plot of land once doesn't mean they have some divine right to it for the rest of time.  If they can take it, it's theirs for as long as they can hold it, but they don't deserve it until they can take it.  And the moment they lose it, it isn't theirs anymore.  There are potential allies, and other places to live in Thedas.  The Dalish simply refuse to even attempt to cultivate or consider any of them.  They'd rather wander from place to place, doing their best to ****** off or kill anyone who gets close, regardless of intention, with predictable results. 


Considering that the Andrastian kingdoms consider the Dalish heathens and criminalize their religion and culture, I'm doubtful that it would be as simple as you claim. Even Merrill thinks a new kingdom would be the target of half of Thedas. My hope would be that the Inquisition could change the balance in favor of the elves.

Modifié par LobselVith8, 19 janvier 2014 - 06:58 .


#572
Mistic

Mistic
  • Members
  • 2 199 messages

Misticsan wrote...

One of the things I would like to see in DA:I about the Dalish is the opposition between their two philosophical ways. The famous one and most associated with the Dalish is the Vir Tanadhal, the way of the three trees, but then DA2 came with that reference to the Vir Tasallan, the way of peace. More difficult and much less popular, but maybe a Dalish inquisitor could follow it?


Oops, Vir Atish'an, not Vir Tasallan. Mistook that with Merill's staff :whistle:

#573
Vandicus

Vandicus
  • Members
  • 2 426 messages

Misticsan wrote...

Vandicus wrote...

Misticsan wrote...

In Exile wrote...

I've never understood the focus on the Dales, personally, when the true lost homeland of the elves is Arlathan. 


I suppose it's because Arlatahn was sunken, so it's of no use to anyone. Still, why do so many people mix the Dalish with the ancient Elves from Arlathan? Even the current nomadic Dalish have little thing to do with the Dales.


Mostly because of their desire to repeat history.

Arlathan fell because of isolationism.
The Dales fell because of isolationism.
The modern Dalish are in love with the idea of isolationism. Gee, I wonder how this will turn out.


Mm, true. Elves love repeating the same mistakes, don't they? Or maybe there is hope.

One of the things I would like to see in DA:I about the Dalish is the opposition between their two philosophical ways. The famous one and most associated with the Dalish is the Vir Tanadhal, the way of the three trees, but then DA2 came with that reference to the Vir Tasallan, the way of peace. More difficult and much less popular, but maybe a Dalish inquisitor could follow it?


I'd like to see them actually follow the last two tenets of Vir Tanadhal. It seems the Dalish know how to be unflexible, but not how to work with other elves or humans.

#574
Fast Jimmy

Fast Jimmy
  • Members
  • 17 939 messages

What I hope to see happen in DA:I or even Masked Empire is for the Dalish to play a role in winning the civil war for Empress.  If they can regain the Dales through a newly established relationship with Orlais they might have a better chance keeping it, especially with the Chantry crumbling from its former power.  And I imagine Ferelden would support having a buffer between them and Orlais.


That would be exactry what people like myself and Fast Jimmy are arguing for - that the Dalish, if they want to actually secure a future for themselves and their homeland, have to find some way to integrate themselves into Thedas, by building alliances and a general power-base. 

Like what the CEs are doing by throwing in with Gaspard. 


Although, to add, the Dalish would not just throw their lot in once and be good. The Dalish did this exactly with Andraste's rebellion, which earned them a large reprieve by the rest of the world. But then they isolated themselves, not having anything to do with the other nations. A century or so later, they spurned the other nations (note, not other races, but NATIONS) by keeping to themselves, even I a time of need, such that when they were being harassed by the Orlesians, the rest of the world found it just as easy to keep to themselves in the Dalish's time of need.

They need to establish relationships with the rest of Thedas. Period. If they are given a nation and just want to accept elves only in order to try and chase a dream of magical immortality, their nation will fail. Again.

Modifié par Fast Jimmy, 19 janvier 2014 - 06:59 .


#575
Fortlowe

Fortlowe
  • Members
  • 2 555 messages
It's not a dream if it's true. It's a goal. Who wouldn't want themselves and everyone they love to live forever.

Modifié par Fortlowe, 19 janvier 2014 - 07:03 .