cjones91 wrote...
Even the Korcari Wilds and the area surrounding it?I find it hard to believe that all of that land is under a noble's control considering all of the tribes living there.Master Warder Z wrote...
cjones91 wrote...
But who owns the lands containing Ostagar?The only people who live there are several tribes and Chasind.EmperorSahlertz wrote...
Ferelden is NOT an absolute monarchy, so the King's word isn't law. The individual nobles rule their lands. The Ferelden king needs the support of the nobles, otherwise his rulership falls apart, and a new king will be elected by the Landsmeet. The king giving away land of lesser nobles is bound to upset some nobles, which would ripple out to affect the Elves too.
There are Human settlements on the borders and within the Wilds and at least one "Lord" to be confirmed (The one who ruled over Lothering) So it would be likely that the entire province was deeded to at least one noble line.
I really don't considering that if History is anything to go by you don't need to occupy territory to own it.
.-. Besides given there are Settlements fairly deep into the Wilds that indicates to me at least that there is more then merely Barbarians within the forest; Besides Honnleath which was in the deepest portions of Feraldan alongside the Wilds was considered part of the Arling of Redcliffe.
And given the vast amount of distance from the Village and Keep it self it wouldn't be an inaccurate assumption to place the entire thing under their Domain, but that said merely because it part of the Arling doesn't mean it doesn't have minor bans to act as local Lords as Lothering proved.
So you likely have several Nobles with interested staked in keeping the region in human control if for nothing else merely to maintain their own houses fortunes.





Retour en haut




