117 réponses à ce sujet

[Akernis]

Fast Jimmy wrote...

I would debate paying extra for such a component to NOT exist in the game.

Agreed. 

[cogsandcurls]

Having got rather hooked on a certain MMO recently I'm not opposed to paying for an online component in theory...but I play DA for the character interaction/plot stuff so anything I had to pay for that didn't include that stuff probably wouldn't make me reach for my wallet, tbh.

I played a lot of ME3 multiplayer but that was good for jumping in for a few matches when the fancy took me, I can't imagine I would ever have bothered playing it if it required some kind of dedicated financial investment.

[The Qun & the Damned]

Ugh, maker no.

[ManOfSteel]

Absolutely not.

The MMO should be the only genre to get away with having a monthly fee, and even then, that business model is dying.

Modifié par DoomHK, 23 janvier 2014 - 02:07 .

[Hendrik.III]

Why would you even suggest paying extra for anything? Are you daft?

[CybAnt1]

I would say, in general, asking gamers about most features: "do you want it?" -- it's generally yes, UNLESS it compromises or negates another feature they like. And you'll get a meh if they don't really care but has no other overall impact.

Asking them, "do you want to pay more for it" -- well, no. Who WANTS to pay more for anything?

It's interesting to watch how many MMOs are now going to the F2P "but" model ... free to play, but if you want to unlock this class, or that race, or this feature, or this dungeon, or those crystals you need for crafting ... one time micro transaction or subscription fee kicks in.

Hook 'em with "freeness," make 'em pay for the good stuff.

[Star fury]

I would've said no, even NO, before ME3. But ironically ME3 multiplayer was the best part of the game while singleplayer was a huge disappointment with endings and other shenanigans.

So I definitely will try DAI MP, if devs make any.

[Slayer299]

Not one single cent.

[WonderNubs23]

Nope.

[luckycooky25]

No Dragon age is for singel player
World of Warcraft is for Multi player

[Blackrising]

I wouldn't even want it if it was free.

[thebigbad1013]

I wouldn't pay for it, no. If they include some kind of multiplayer for free like they did with Mass Effect 3 then I'll most likely at least give it a shot, but I wouldn't pay extra for it.

[Grieving Natashina]

Modifié par Starsyn, 23 janvier 2014 - 02:59 .

[DRTJR]

 Sten what do You think of DA online?

My fealing as well.

[CrabbyCrackers]

NO i dont play well with others, i never play online mode games. i like to enjoy a game, not play with a bunch of teeny boppers who just discovered the f word and use it for the sake of using it.

[Bfler]

No, it's a singleplayer game. If they want such a multiplayer, then they shall create a MMORPG, like Elder Scrolls Online for TES series.

[Ananka]

No, I would not. Multiplayer does not interest me at all. I wouldn't be interested in it even if it were for free.

[Rotward]

Nope.

Akernis wrote...

Fast Jimmy wrote...

I would debate paying extra for such a component to NOT exist in the game.

Agreed. 

Don't give them ideas, they would really do that. 

Modifié par Rotward, 23 janvier 2014 - 05:52 .

[St. Victorious]

Has anyone said yes yet?

I'm all for MP and I still say no.

[otis0310]

I would pay to NOT have one. Does that help?

[Jorina Leto]

No.