Aller au contenu

Photo

Dragon Age: The Masked Empire [beware of spoilers]


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
1058 réponses à ce sujet

#426
JakeLeTDK

JakeLeTDK
  • Members
  • 381 messages

Spoiler

Spoiler
 



#427
bairdduvessa

bairdduvessa
  • Members
  • 726 messages

Spoiler

i should have been clear.  

Spoiler



#428
bairdduvessa

bairdduvessa
  • Members
  • 726 messages

Wonder if this ruin is going to play a role in however we deal with Briala.

 

Spoiler

dunno, but i want to live there



#429
JakeLeTDK

JakeLeTDK
  • Members
  • 381 messages

i should have been clear.  

Spoiler

Spoiler


  • bairdduvessa aime ceci

#430
bairdduvessa

bairdduvessa
  • Members
  • 726 messages

Spoiler

Spoiler



#431
JakeLeTDK

JakeLeTDK
  • Members
  • 381 messages

Spoiler

Spoiler



#432
bairdduvessa

bairdduvessa
  • Members
  • 726 messages

Spoiler

i think you're right



#433
Wissenschaft

Wissenschaft
  • Members
  • 1 607 messages

Spoiler

 

Bah, I can dream. This is a video game after all, not  reality. :P

 

I do know that if given the option, mr. murderknife will be kept busy.



#434
ladyofpayne

ladyofpayne
  • Members
  • 3 107 messages

 

 

senseless slaughter of peasants

Well it is Medieval in Thedas. Class structure society. Ferelden has no difference- just remind you Loghain sold elves to Tevinter.



#435
Das Tentakel

Das Tentakel
  • Members
  • 1 321 messages

Well it is Medieval in Thedas. Class structure society. Ferelden has no difference- just remind you Loghain sold elves to Tevinter.

 

Nah, that's not really medieval. Peasants are capital (and often military manpower as well), you only kill them when they really get unreasonable (see 'Jacquerie') or when they're somebody else's peasants in the case of war (economic warfare, really). Generally the average noble would try to protect his peasants (after all - revenue...), at least to a certain degree, or try to attract fresh peasants (mo' money) by offering various advantages to settlers.

Friction arose when nobles (or the State) felt forced to squeeze more revenue out of their existing peasants or economic difficulties (failed harvests etc.) made it difficult for the peasants to cough up the customary revenues. Then you sometimes got situations with peasants killing nobles and vice versa.

 

There are of course cases where a noble sexually harassed 'his' peasants' daughters or wives or do other kinds of mischief. However, outside those modern countries where rule of law is a thing even today a relatively poor person (or employee) has a very weak position versus a wealthy and well-connected one or his/her boss. It's the result of a major difference in wealth, power and influence; similar things could (and can) happen between a wealthy peasant and a poor one.

 

Otherwise, Masked Empire sounds like a decent franchise novel, just as the excerpt suggested :) .


  • Dabrikishaw et Nox aiment ceci

#436
ladyofpayne

ladyofpayne
  • Members
  • 3 107 messages
"Do you have a suggestion, Remache?" Gaspard asked. "Or are you just pissing in my wine?"

 

Hello, my favorite male character.


  • Estelindis et efd731 aiment ceci

#437
QueenPurpleScrap

QueenPurpleScrap
  • Members
  • 718 messages

Finished reading the book and found it quite interesting and enjoyable. I found some of the characters to be more surprising than I expected and I do think it gives more insight into Orlais, the Game, and society. We already knew that Orlais would be undergoing a civil war at the time of DAI, and that there was going to be something going on with the elves. Much as Asunder provided some background into the Mage/Templar conflict this book tells us how Orlais got to this point. In a sense it was more necessary than Asunder because the actions of DA2 already set up that conflict and Asunder fleshed it out. Orlais and Empress Celene were mentioned, of course, but there was no explanation for why Orlais was warring with itself. It's not quite so simple as a grab for power, though that is certainly a strong motivation.

 

I also found the code of the chevalier interesting, how living by it (or not) had such a profound impact on some of the characters. I was not pre-disposed to like Empress Celene (or any of the characters, really) because Orlais already seemed like a Machiavelli/Medici stew but I found myself liking some that I did not expect. While I know which side I am rooting for (I think) in terms of the civil war I understand, and have some sympathy for, the other side much better than I thought I would.


  • ddman12, bairdduvessa, ElitePinecone et 1 autre aiment ceci

#438
Aimi

Aimi
  • Members
  • 4 616 messages

Nah, that's not really medieval. Peasants are capital (and often military manpower as well), you only kill them when they really get unreasonable (see 'Jacquerie') or when they're somebody else's peasants in the case of war (economic warfare, really). Generally the average noble would try to protect his peasants (after all - revenue...), at least to a certain degree, or try to attract fresh peasants (mo' money) by offering various advantages to settlers.
Friction arose when nobles (or the State) felt forced to squeeze more revenue out of their existing peasants or economic difficulties (failed harvests etc.) made it difficult for the peasants to cough up the customary revenues. Then you sometimes got situations with peasants killing nobles and vice versa.
 
There are of course cases where a noble sexually harassed 'his' peasants' daughters or wives or do other kinds of mischief. However, outside those modern countries where rule of law is a thing even today a relatively poor person (or employee) has a very weak position versus a wealthy and well-connected one or his/her boss. It's the result of a major difference in wealth, power and influence; similar things could (and can) happen between a wealthy peasant and a poor one.


Focusing on purely materialistic explanations for group behavior is so seventies :P

#439
ElitePinecone

ElitePinecone
  • Members
  • 12 936 messages

I also found the code of the chevalier interesting, how living by it (or not) had such a profound impact on some of the characters. I was not pre-disposed to like Empress Celene (or any of the characters, really) because Orlais already seemed like a Machiavelli/Medici stew but I found myself liking some that I did not expect. While I know which side I am rooting for (I think) in terms of the civil war I understand, and have some sympathy for, the other side much better than I thought I would.

 

This is exactly how I feel, yeah.

 

Masked Empire did a great job of humanising its characters, even the ones that looked set up to be villains, so that by the end of it I could understand the motivations for their actions - to a certain extent - even if I didn't agree with them.

 

I think that's a wonderfully rare thing for stories to get right (let alone videogame stories!), and I really hope it continues in Inquisition. 


  • ddman12, bairdduvessa et Ihatebadgames aiment ceci

#440
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Though Elf inquisitor actually presents an interesting complication, They're exclusively Dalish according to the Devs, and considering how things went down between Briala and the Dalish in Masked Empire...

 

The clan in the novel was fairly atypical of the Dalish, however, in summoning a spirit, which goes against the traditions of the Dalish in avoiding magic that involves spirits. "Unlike other spellcasters, Dalish mages do not use any magic involving spirits, as they believe all spirits are dangerous." (page 104) It follows the same line of thought that's expressed by Merrill, who says all spirits are dangerous.

 

That said, I'm curious how Briala will respond to an elven Inquisitor, and if she will present a third option in the dichotomy between Celene and Gaspard.



#441
Heimdall

Heimdall
  • Members
  • 13 236 messages

The clan in the novel was fairly atypical of the Dalish, however, in summoning a spirit, which goes against the traditions of the Dalish in avoiding magic that involves spirits. "Unlike other spellcasters, Dalish mages do not use any magic involving spirits, as they believe all spirits are dangerous." (page 104) It follows the same line of thought that's expressed by Merrill, who says all spirits are dangerous.

That said, I'm curious how Briala will respond to an elven Inquisitor, and if she will present a third option in the dichotomy between Celene and Gaspard.

Briala's issue with the Dalish was mostly related to their tendency to look down on the City Elves, not their magical practices.

Perhaps I missed something, but I didn't get the impression that Briala was planning anything so dramatic as a a general uprising. Rather, she seemed to only want to exploit the chaos to strengthen the elven position.

Whether that necessarily leads to revolution, I don't know, but I don't think she really represents a third option except that helpin her would only draw out the civil war between the other two.

#442
azarhal

azarhal
  • Members
  • 4 458 messages

The clan in the novel was fairly atypical of the Dalish, however, in summoning a spirit, which goes against the traditions of the Dalish in avoiding magic that involves spirits. "Unlike other spellcasters, Dalish mages do not use any magic involving spirits, as they believe all spirits are dangerous." (page 104) It follows the same line of thought that's expressed by Merrill, who says all spirits are dangerous.

 

You know, while we got lore saying that, we also have Zathrian who have no issue summoning and binding a spirit and Marethari who knew a spells to get people into the Fade with no lyrium requirement, blood magic or many mages to perform the ritual. She said it was an old elven ritual.

 

The older the Dalish, the more they seem to deal with spirits and the Fade...



#443
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 387 messages

The clan in the novel was fairly atypical of the Dalish, however, in summoning a spirit, which goes against the traditions of the Dalish in avoiding magic that involves spirits. "Unlike other spellcasters, Dalish mages do not use any magic involving spirits, as they believe all spirits are dangerous." (page 104) It follows the same line of thought that's expressed by Merrill, who says all spirits are dangerous.

 

That said, I'm curious how Briala will respond to an elven Inquisitor, and if she will present a third option in the dichotomy between Celene and Gaspard.

 

Their views on "flat ears" though, appears to be quite typical.



#444
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Spoiler

 

Which is why I'd like to see her as a potential ally in Inquisition, and have the opportunity to help her cause.


  • SurelyForth aime ceci

#445
Spectre slayer

Spectre slayer
  • Members
  • 1 427 messages
The Dalish are an odd an contradictory bunch when it comes to certain things like magic and spirit's but when it comes to demons their views are pretty skewed as told by Felassan and what we read about Imasheal.

Spoiler

  • bairdduvessa aime ceci

#446
KC_Prototype

KC_Prototype
  • Members
  • 4 603 messages

Could Briala be this "Sera" character we talk about in Inquisition? I was hoping for Sera to be her own character but from what I read in the book so far, Briala sounds like she could be the rogue elf companion in DA:I.



#447
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

Briala's issue with the Dalish was mostly related to their tendency to look down on the City Elves, not their magical practices.

Perhaps I missed something, but I didn't get the impression that Briala was planning anything so dramatic as a a general uprising. Rather, she seemed to only want to exploit the chaos to strengthen the elven position.

Whether that necessarily leads to revolution, I don't know, but I don't think she really represents a third option except that helpin her would only draw out the civil war between the other two.

 

Some Dalish do that, but some city elves do that as well, viewing the Dalish as savages, and even looking down on some elves as "flat ears", including the ones who try to live outside the Alienage. Every group in Thedas has their flaws.

 

If Briala's intent is to help the elves, I'm hoping it's possible that the Inquisitor can help her achieve that goal.

 

Their views on "flat ears" though, appears to be quite typical.

 

A derogatory term used by some Dalish and some city elves.



#448
ElitePinecone

ElitePinecone
  • Members
  • 12 936 messages

Could Briala be this "Sera" character we talk about in Inquisition? I was hoping for Sera to be her own character but from what I read in the book so far, Briala sounds like she could be the rogue elf companion in DA:I.

 

huh

 

 

 

  • Sera is young, frenetic, and a brat through and through. She revels in the athleticism of being an elf, of being different. But her culture isn’t elven, or, for that matter, strictly human. It’s the underbelly of the city. In her network of rogues, what you do is more important than where you’re from, and friends open more doors than [titles?]. Robs from the rich, keeps it.


#449
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

You know, while we got lore saying that, we also have Zathrian who have no issue summoning and binding a spirit and Marethari who knew a spells to get people into the Fade with no lyrium requirement, blood magic or many mages to perform the ritual. She said it was an old elven ritual.

 

The older the Dalish, the more they seem to deal with spirits and the Fade...

 

Zathrian used blood magic in secret to curse the humans who murdered his son and raped his daughter, and the ancient spell used by Marethari was never said to involve the aid of spirits. There's also a difference between venturing into the Fade (the Beyond), and dealing with spirits.

 

The Dalish are an odd an contradictory bunch when it comes to certain things like magic and spirit's but when it comes to demons their views are pretty skewed as told by Felassan and what we read about Imasheal.

Spoiler

 

Which contradicts what Merrill and World of Thedas have said about the Dalish viewing all spirits as dangerous, as well as the religious debates between Merrill and Anders where she doesn't use the distinction between Spirits and Demons because it's tied to cultural and religious Andrastian views (with Spirits being the Children of the Maker, and Demons being Spirits who turned their backs on the Maker in jealousy over humanity). As Anders says, "Maybe you don't really understand the difference between spirits and demons. [...] Spirits were the first children of the Maker, but He turned his back on them to dote on His mortal creations. The ones who resented this became demons, driven to take everything mortals had and gain back the Maker's favor."



#450
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 387 messages

Could Briala be this "Sera" character we talk about in Inquisition? I was hoping for Sera to be her own character but from what I read in the book so far, Briala sounds like she could be the rogue elf companion in DA:I.

 

I don't think so. Briala has dark hair and the pictures of "Sera" (assuming that's her) seem to be blonde