In other words, Celene's rule is far from an absolute monarchy. Orlais is very much a feudal state. It reminds me of the state of France before Louis XIV consolidated power in the monarchy.
"Absolute monarchy" is an increasingly deprecated term. So is "feudal". And the distinction is notoriously difficult to apply to Louis XIV's France, because despite all the faffing about with Versailles and the notorious
intendants, the actual mechanisms of local power during the Sun King's reign didn't change that much. Landed aristocrats still generalled the armies and ran the bureaucracy.
Intendants were rarely deployed and more often than not ended up enforcing an extant status quo based on the policy of local notables. The fact that Louis did not have to fight against a
fronde in his later years isn't necessarily down to a fundamental shift in the organization of the Bourbon monarchy; his ancestor Henri IV didn't have to fight against one either, after all. Many modern scholars consider Louisine France to be a very
poor example of what the historians of the 1950s (say) would have called an absolute monarchy.
Nowadays, the paradigm in early-modern European studies has shifted away from "absolutism" and power relations to something called the "fiscal-military state", growing out of the historiography opposed to Michael Roberts' famous "Military Revolution". It's...a fairly complex thing to get into, though.
Anyway. If I'm not mistaken, what you mean to say is that Celene's Orlais is a monarchy in which the monarch's exercise of power is mediated by negotiation with key landed-aristocrat and clerical interests, and that that negotiation is both coercive and consensus-based, and that although in terms of pure power-relations and in terms of ideology Celene possesses some form of supremacy, that supremacy is not unlimited and indeed is often subject to circumscription by the notables that participate in the Game.
Which is a mouthful and may not even help people understand the situation all that much better, but y'know, historians are the enemies of shorthand and generalization.