Good and evil is subjective. There are acts that many can agree upon as "evil" (I have some myself,) but when it comes to Origins and Inquisition, I saw less evil choices. What I mostly saw was pragmatic choices:
prag·mat·ic adjective \\prag-ˈma-tik\\
: dealing with the problems that exist in a specific situation in a reasonable and logical way instead of depending on ideas and theories
2 : relating to matters of fact or practical affairs often to the exclusion of intellectual or artistic matters : practical as opposed to idealistic <pragmatic men of power have had no time or inclination to deal with … social morality — K. B. Clark>
A pragmatic has to get things done and can't always worry about the morality of the issue. I figure that's why there is Blood Mages in the Wardens. What others see as "evil" the Wardens see as one more tool against the Blight.
There is somethings
I personally consider evil: Genocide of the mages, giving Fenris back to the man that sexually and physically abused him; the (admittedly few) Templars that were beating, whipping and abusing mages; keeping Conner a demon; Tarohne making sure the Templars were getting possessed, ect.
*I did not include Isabela on that list. I never have given her back to the Qunari, but even I can admit she would deserve it. Besides, even if you do that, Varric will say in the ending that Isabela got out a few days later. <shrug>
However, that's just my views on it. I don't pick those choices for myself, but I can respect those that do. Being evil is subjective; being pragmatic is not. You can be pragmatic without being evil and vice versa.
Modifié par Starsyn, 28 janvier 2014 - 10:08 .