700 réponses à ce sujet

[The Elder King]

As I said, I don't care if Cullen is a companion. But seeing those type of post make me want him in the party just to ****** off those people.

[happy_daiz]

Rassler wrote...
Thanks but no thanks. The templar personality can be shoved back to where it belongs. We had no real templar companion so far (Alistair doesn't count) and it shall remain that way. Amen. 

Well, I'm glad you're not in charge.

[Lulupab]

hhh89 wrote...

As I said, I don't care if Cullen is a companion. But seeing those type of post make me want him in the party just to ****** off those people.

happy_daiz wrote...

Rassler wrote...
Thanks but no thanks. The templar personality can be shoved back to where it belongs. We had no real templar companion so far (Alistair doesn't count) and it shall remain that way. Amen. 

Well, I'm glad you're not in charge. 

Meh, A templar in party? Cullen? OH YES! We will upset him any chance we get, ****** on him. Deny everything that makes him happy. Have sex with him and tell him he was a terrible love maker! 

The safest route for Cullen is to be an Agent not companion. Possibily an NPC romance as well like some ME3 characters.

I have nothing against Cullen personally really. But I hate Templars. I chose the mages by process of elimination. I simply hated the Templars more, I didn't like the mages either. I'm more pro Anders than anything and it sometimes forces me to support mages as well, meh I don't care really BUT I HATE TEMPLARS. 

This probably won't happen but if it does omg <3

EX-TEMPLAR CULLEN! Like Alistair! Please make it happen Bioware 

Modifié par Rassler, 31 janvier 2014 - 07:22 .

[The Elder King]

I don't get why it'd be the safest route. 
I get it that you hate templars. But you don't have to love every companions.

Modifié par hhh89, 31 janvier 2014 - 07:24 .

[AresKeith]

hhh89 wrote...

I don't get why it'd be the safest route. 
I get it that you hate templars. But you don't have to love every companions.

I think people forget that they can basically ignore them 

[Lulupab]

hhh89 wrote...

I don't get why it'd be the safest route. 
I get it that you hate templars. But you don't have to love every companions.

Lol that way Cullen is untouchable and always there, is not safe?

I hated Fenris's gut but I never gave him to Danarius or killed him or not recruited him. I rivaled the **** out of him, but I kept him. I watched what happens if you give him to Danarius on youtube, couldn't bring myself to do it. I brought the mouse pointer on the decision, stared at it for like 5 minutes and couldn't do it. I recruit and keep all companions but I actually like that they don't agree with me all the time and are only in party because they respect me but hate my guts, like Fenris. It makes the game more real.

[mopotter]

ElitePinecone wrote...

David Gaider wrote...

Quite frankly, if there ever was a group of fans who I (or anyone else on the DA team) would include something just to make them happy, I think we'd lean more towards the "polite but enthusiastic" than not. Just saying.

I like this approach.

And if it has the side-effect of making fans err on the side of being polite and enthusiastic, that'd be great.

(Instead of, I don't know, grumpy, rude and relentlessly negative)

I agree.  politeness should be encouraged any way possible.   You can disagree with people without being rude, grumpy and negative.  

[Hellion Rex]

Rassler wrote...

Meh, A templar in party? Cullen? OH YES! We will upset him any chance we get, ****** on him. Deny everything that makes him happy. Have sex with him and tell him he was a terrible love maker!

Kind of petty, don't you think? Plus, I think his Sword of Mercy would be quite the powerful instrument.

[mopotter]

happy_daiz wrote...

Rassler wrote...
Thanks but no thanks. The templar personality can be shoved back to where it belongs. We had no real templar companion so far (Alistair doesn't count) and it shall remain that way. Amen. 

Well, I'm glad you're not in charge.

Yeah me too.  Though I would like the option to pick and choose who we want to have join us.  I found Zev very satisfying for this.  Human Nobel killed him because he attacked her, human mage let him live because she was naive.  The elf let him live because he was an elf.  

Companion options I'd love to have - be able to not even ask some, or tell them to leave or kill them if they attack. I'd have a group filled with just mages or mage supporters, another filled with just templar supporters and one with a mixed group.  fun stuff.

[Pasquale1234]

hhh89 wrote...

As I said, I don't care if Cullen is a companion. But seeing those type of post make me want him in the party just to ****** off those people.

Me, too.

I don't care all that much whether characters return or not.  Above all else, Bioware excels at creating interesting characters, and if they see an opportunity to bring one back in a meaningful way, it's nice when they do so.

[DonaldFwump]

Veruin wrote...

 Now if Alistair came up, said swooping is bad, then ran off while making airplane noises, I would call it fan service.

 I support this fanservice.  Immersion breaking? Certainly.  Non-sensical?  Definitely.   Hilarious?  I think so.   But only if he makes the airplane noises...otherwise meh.

[HiroVoid]

mopotter wrote...

ElitePinecone wrote...

David Gaider wrote...

Quite frankly, if there ever was a group of fans who I (or anyone else on the DA team) would include something just to make them happy, I think we'd lean more towards the "polite but enthusiastic" than not. Just saying.

I like this approach.

And if it has the side-effect of making fans err on the side of being polite and enthusiastic, that'd be great.

(Instead of, I don't know, grumpy, rude and relentlessly negative)

I agree.  politeness should be encouraged any way possible.   You can disagree with people without being rude, grumpy and negative.  

I DON'T like that approach.

[Lulupab]

eluvianix wrote...

Rassler wrote...

Meh, A templar in party? Cullen? OH YES! We will upset him any chance we get, ****** on him. Deny everything that makes him happy. Have sex with him and tell him he was a terrible love maker!

Kind of petty, don't you think? Plus, I think his Sword of Mercy would be quite the powerful instrument.

I don't kill or sell compnaions to slavery etc... The worst scenario is I torment them like that :innocent:

[Grieving Natashina]

David Gaider wrote...

eluvianix wrote...
And yet here you are..

This isn't a character discussion, unless that's been going on in the last however many pages. I responded to the initial post, based on my observations of the forum to date.

Thanks for your feedback!  It was unexpected. 

[Heimdall]

Rassler wrote...

Murderes rapist joing Templar ranks without any resistance.

While it's no secret the Chantry is more concerned with strong arms than pure hearts in their recruitment, there's no evidence that they allow criminals into the order.  I also highly doubt the abuse is as rampant as you imagine, but I'd rather not get into that.

Modifié par Lord Aesir, 31 janvier 2014 - 08:14 .

[The Elder King]

Rassler wrote...

Lol that way Cullen is untouchable and always there, is not safe?

I hated Fenris's gut but I never gave him to Danarius or killed him or not recruited him. I rivaled the **** out of him, but I kept him. I watched what happens if you give him to Danarius on youtube, couldn't bring myself to do it. I brought the mouse pointer on the decision, stared at it for like 5 minutes and couldn't do it. I recruit and keep all companions but I actually like that they don't agree with me all the time and are only in party because they respect me but hate my guts, like Fenris. It makes the game more real.

I didn't understand you meant that. Though being an NPC doesn't mean he can't die.

[Hellion Rex]

Rassler wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

Rassler wrote...

Meh, A templar in party? Cullen? OH YES! We will upset him any chance we get, ****** on him. Deny everything that makes him happy. Have sex with him and tell him he was a terrible love maker!

Kind of petty, don't you think? Plus, I think his Sword of Mercy would be quite the powerful instrument.

I don't kill or sell compnaions to slavery etc... The worst scenario is I torment them like that :innocent:

But why torment him at all? It's not very nice.

[Grieving Natashina]

Eluvianix: It might not be your style (or mine,) but there is a simple reason for that. People like to roleplay different mentalities, and sometimes pretending to be a heartless bastard in a game is cathartic.

Modifié par Starsyn, 31 janvier 2014 - 09:27 .

[EmperorSahlertz]

Discussion with Rassler is almost, keyword almost, tantamount to discussion with Kommander. It ends up just being stupid

[TheKomandorShepard]

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

Discussion with Rassler is almost, keyword almost, tantamount to discussion with Kommander. It ends up just being stupid

Well if someone doesn't have arguments it is hard me to change that isn't that emperor?

[Lulupab]

Starsyn wrote...

Eluvianix: It might not be your style (or mine,) but there is a simple reason for that. People like to roleplay different mentalities, and sometimes pretending to be a heartless bastard in a game is cathartic.

Lol more like heartless at templars. I'm probably going to worship any mage companion introduced to us, especially if they are a male mage 

[Lulupab]

EmperorSahlertz wrote...

Discussion with Rassler is almost, keyword almost, tantamount to discussion with Kommander. It ends up just being stupid

Have you once witnessed me discussing anything with kommander? My inner Grammar **** begs me to end its life. I have yet to see a topic in which me and Kommander agree to the same thing. I mean honestly, do you see me agreeing to someone who wants to kill all mages. 

Modifié par Rassler, 01 février 2014 - 06:42 .

[The Elder King]

Rassler wrote...

Starsyn wrote...

Eluvianix: It might not be your style (or mine,) but there is a simple reason for that. People like to roleplay different mentalities, and sometimes pretending to be a heartless bastard in a game is cathartic.

Lol more like heartless at templars. I'm probably going to worship any mage companion introduced to us, especially if they are a male mage 

What if the mage in question wants the Circle system back:whistle:?

[Gear2nd]

Hate to be rude, but arguing about fan service in a video game, is like arguing about fan service in any other medium. All it's going to do is become a war where fangirls/fanboys vs. the pple who hate them, and 9 times out of 10 the fanboys/fangirls will always win..simply because the devs/writers will add anything that will make anybody happy no matter what.

Honestly, I don't see the appeal in Cullen, he seems like another Alistair/Anders type character to me, but who knows he may actually be decent.

[Lulupab]

hhh89 wrote...

Rassler wrote...

Starsyn wrote...

Eluvianix: It might not be your style (or mine,) but there is a simple reason for that. People like to roleplay different mentalities, and sometimes pretending to be a heartless bastard in a game is cathartic.

Lol more like heartless at templars. I'm probably going to worship any mage companion introduced to us, especially if they are a male mage 

What if the mage in question wants the Circle system back:whistle:?

Heavens no! I kinda doubt it will happen anyway. The worst scenario is named mage will want peace, I don't think a sane mage would want to back to the old circles. Start a war, people die only to go back to the old system? I have no problems with mages being under control but the circles are not coming back, at least not in previous fashion. A new method needs to be introduced.