FP!
Custom Content Challenge: February 2014: Gothic
#101
Posté 16 février 2014 - 02:48
FP!
#102
Posté 16 février 2014 - 06:06
Wow !
You guys are just so talented and inspirational !!
Really fantastic !
#103
Posté 16 février 2014 - 01:55

What about of a VFX, aligned to head; of the half-mask of the phantom of the Opera?
Modifié par Shemsu-Heru, 16 février 2014 - 01:57 .
#104
Posté 16 février 2014 - 02:25
#105
Posté 16 février 2014 - 10:21

By request; Here is the creature from the black lagoon, or Ravenloft reaver if you prefer...

It's made from a free model at sharecg.com by SsSandu_C. It's seems that the only restriction of this model, is not to use it for commercial purpose.

This creature uses old ghoul animations, and it's not able to wear weapons or shields.

"Agrrr, I'm the creature of the black lagoon, Garrr, I demand gorgeous women in swimming suit, Agrrr!!!"
Modifié par Shemsu-Heru, 16 février 2014 - 10:34 .
#106
Posté 16 février 2014 - 11:43
#107
Posté 17 février 2014 - 06:20
#108
Posté 17 février 2014 - 11:16
First, he packages on OpenGameArt, uploaded by another person, with my permission and kindly asking, is outdated.
It's been a while, five years ago, I didn't even remember.
I don't know if the admins will decide to remove it or to replace it with the newer one. However, the "problem" persists.
You should be aware of the fact the law protects the so-called "moral rights" on the artworks.
Those right are granted and cannot even be waived by the autor.
You can see what it means here for example:
http://www.artslaw.c...e-moral-rights/
And here:
http://www.ipo.gov.u...moralrights.htm
So I really don't understand where the problem is.
Summary, from the artslaw site linked above:
- Moral rights are about keeping the connection between you and your work.
- You have moral rights in relation to the work you create.
- You have the right to be recognised, or named, as the creator of your work.
- No one should do anything to your work that hurts your reputation.
- You cannot give away your moral rights. They are for you only.
- Moral rights last for your lifetime and up to 70 years after your death.
- If someone does not show your name with your work, or treats your work in a way that hurts your reputation, this is called a moral rights infringement.
If you think the artists moral rights are wrong for this website, I'm afraid you will have to create all of your artwork by yourself.
Because even if the author does'nt give you a hint on what he/she considers lesive of reputation, you can still be sued.
Not by me, probably. I don't give a f***. But from anyone that releases artwork for free.
That's it.
Tiziana
#109
Posté 17 février 2014 - 11:19
#110
Posté 17 février 2014 - 01:39
I'm very sorry it has come to this, as we really don't want to reopen arguments that have damaged this community in the past.TiZeta wrote...
And of course, you can use the models, and I'm glad you do it. If in doubt on what can/cannot be done, just ask
The CC-BY license is normally a clear sign that we can adapt and distribute the work, as long as we credit the author and don't suggest that they endorse what we have done. For many authors, that's sufficient protection of their reputation.
However, when an author qualifies the license, it should warn us that they are not entirely comfortable with the open spirit of Creative Commons.
Before I contributed to the Custom Content Challenge, I asked one of the organisers to confirm that it is about open source content. That's the only reason I'm involved; if that's wrong, tell me, and I will bow out.
If the Challenge is truly open (implying that the author will never seek to censor, damage, or harass the creators of derivative works, or require them to seek permission), I believe that it was an honest mistake to use TiZeta's material here. I mean no disrespect to Shemsu-Heru, an outstanding community member whose work is of the very highest standard, but perhaps it would be better to publish these particular models independently, or as part of a project that welcomes restricted content.
I respect those community members who feel that we should remain silent on these matters, to keep the peace, but, in my humble opinion, protecting the reputation of Creative Commons as a trusted brand is of paramount importance.
Everyone understands that some authors want to control how their work is used, but if this is an open project, I honestly believe that discussion belongs in another thread.
Suffice it to say that TiZeta is free to do whatever she likes, and that I, for my part, give my word of honour never to use her work in any shape or form.
#111
Posté 17 février 2014 - 02:21
All the others that I realeased later that don't have it. On blendswap, for example. And, since you don't read what i write, repetitia juvant (well, maybe..)
I released the newer models without restrictions because no matter what I write or say, they are still there. Those restrictions, I mean. They are there for my works, they are there for every other artist work. So for what you are saying, you should not use nobody's else work.
But the worst part is that you are trying to force others (ex. Shemsu Heru) to do what you say.
Very open spirit, man.
#112
Posté 17 février 2014 - 02:27
Relax man.
#113
Posté 17 février 2014 - 03:58
http://wiki.creative...2C_if_at_all.3F
My package is now updated on OpenGameArt, no notes anymore, but don't exult Proleric. My rights are still there. The only difference is that I give no hints on what I consider to be against my reputation. You managed to censorship me, man!!! Kudos.
#114
Posté 17 février 2014 - 04:14
I would never want to create a conflict of interest. I have download the models from a free website, and also have asked to the author, to avoid any misunderstood.
However if organizers of the challenge, consider that those creatures are inadequate, for the challenge; Please let my know. I don't have any problem with published those, out of the challenge.
I have been adding custom content to NWN, for several years. And a great part of my content is completely original; However another important part of it is derived work from other people. Until now I haven seen any wrong, in use models, whose authors have allowed free use for them....
Modifié par Shemsu-Heru, 17 février 2014 - 04:40 .
#115
Posté 17 février 2014 - 04:17
In short, what you said sounded like this: 'You should know that if you use any stuff that's not completely your own, you could be sued.'
Perhaps you did not mean to make it sound quite the way it does. At one point I was into creating 2D art which some people thought good enough to want to use in what they were doing. Some of the nicer ones contacted me and asked permission. Many didn't, but still gave credit. Some others did neither.
To be honest, I am generally fine with this. Might be less fine if someone tried to make money out of my stuff, but that bears zero relation to anything produced in places like this.
I think various perspectives have been voiced and, to avoid derailing this thread, any further discussion (if it must) should happen in a different thread. Please.
*returns to artistic wax dribbling in gmax*
Modifié par KlatchainCoffee, 17 février 2014 - 04:24 .
#116
Posté 17 février 2014 - 04:48
KlatchainCoffee wrote...
In short, what you said sounded like this: 'You should know that if you use any stuff that's not completely your own, you could be sued.'
Unless you have really deep pockets or deliberately set out to damage somebody's reputation, it seems pretty unlikely that you would be sued; hiring a lawyer for friovlous purposes is way too expensive for most folks. If using a work is generally allowed and you are not using it for commercial purposes, I'd say just be respectful and give credit where it is due.
#117
Posté 17 février 2014 - 06:18
TR
#118
Posté 17 février 2014 - 06:19
As you know, authors who license work under Creative Commons are normally the last people on earth who would ever give us any trouble; it's a badge of trust.
Really, the practical concern is not a legal one. I have over 2000 custom components in my module (not including CEP or tilesets). I need to feel confident that I don't have to waste time on usage permissions, and that the risk of dispute or content ripping is low to nil. Like many other writers, I do stuff that's edgy, crossing boundaries that some people don't like.
I don't believe I'm forcing anyone to do anything here, but, just as a free society doesn't allow anti-social behaviour, there's no contradiction when an an open project declines restricted or risky content. Whether that is the case here is not for me to say, of course.
Modifié par Proleric1, 17 février 2014 - 06:20 .
#119
Posté 17 février 2014 - 06:48
You have hurt nothing. I only would like to Know if the creatures that I have made from TiZeta models should be added here or not.
If I have made this is because I think that this use wasn't against TiZeta's conditions. Of course TiZeta have the last work about this. However I think that any module which includes some of this creatures, even if they are used as villains and as a consequence they do unethical things, Don't means that the module is encouraging to imitate that behavior, because they are villains and villains do villainies. So I understand that won't be against TiZeta's license.
Having saying that; I understand your point of view, and if organizers considered that they are not adequate content for the challenge, I don't have any problem removing those creatures.
Modifié par Shemsu-Heru, 17 février 2014 - 07:10 .
#120
Posté 17 février 2014 - 08:49
Shemsu-Heru wrote...
@henesua: Unfortunately I'm not good with VFX.
Man, that is awesome. I would like to request an additional version that is not so lime green in color. A darker green with some black fringing would be nice for a rougher look. But don't get me wrong, I'll gladly take this as is! Thank you for the awesome work!!!!
#121
Posté 17 février 2014 - 09:56
- The models do have a regular CC 2.0 licence. Valid, and free.
- As the author, me, you, everyone has the so called "moral rights", in many countries. Even with Creative Commons. Proleric, have you read the page from the Creative Commons website? Do you think you know more than them, about the CC licence?
- Nobody has the right to tell you that they are not suitable for use in an open contest, as Proleric did (or so it seemed to me). They do have an open licence, and also the "moral right" stuff, like a n y o t h e r s i n g l e w o r k o f a r t b y a n y s i n g l e a r t i s t.
And as someone pointed out, the probability of being sued is close to zero. Especially in my case.
Now do what you want, use them, remove them, whatever. But please leave me alone.
Bye
Tiziana
#122
Posté 17 février 2014 - 10:04
If you dont want your stuff to be released, dont release them or make it clear what is "ok" and what "not"! Make it simple and not 10 pages long! For what you release them if you then place a security lock on them...
And that moral right stuff is honestly laughable at best. Serious, in what world do you life? Either you are a cool person or not. Only that is what counts in regards to respecting other peoples work!
you dont know us, simple as that! But dont place a negative light on us where none exist!
Your tone here was not my taste anyway.
EDIT: And suing another person i know 2 cases, one is where a pro studio used whole game assets from another game and a very old case of a CS clan named AOL. Thats it. So suing others is also ....
EDIT again for that suing stuff.
First you would need my adress... so you would have to ask bioware for my ip to get my name and adress from the ...etc... You know. It´s very unlikely that this will ever happen in any little case anyway. Find an international lawyer office that is capable of doing all that detective work using then national law with a transcriptor... blah bleg blubber
Modifié par NWN_baba yaga, 17 février 2014 - 10:40 .
#123
Posté 17 février 2014 - 10:50
Relax baby. Lol.
Re-read the post
#124
Posté 17 février 2014 - 10:52
#125
Posté 17 février 2014 - 10:56
I wouldnt be called baba yaga if i wouldnt be as i am. Always a hot cauldron ready to jump in when it time
Modifié par NWN_baba yaga, 17 février 2014 - 10:58 .





Retour en haut







