Aller au contenu

Photo

Reapers = D-Reaper?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
2 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Dukemon

Dukemon
  • Members
  • 3 876 messages
 it sounds weard but i think it is interesting.
I watch Digimon Tamers again (think what you want) and it is very amazing how similar the plots are.
so many similarities, some exemples

organic and inorganic beings do together: Digimon/Human - Geth/Human
inorganic nature, by reason of delusion going on to a higher power to the organic: Digimon vs Digimon/Mensch - Heretics vs Geth/Mensch
D-Reaper was created to delete disturbed artificial intelligence - the Reapers were created to destroy the artificial intelligence (until beginning from Mass Effect 2 Plot)
D-Reaper was able to become an independent AI from an application - the Reaper, more specifically, the AI behind the Reapers, seceded and became an independent AI
Both, D-Reaper and Reapers, want to delete the the chaos of organic and inorganic and restore the order.
D-Reaper sends Agents, distorted reflections of the "originals" - Reapers send Agents, distorted reflections of the "originals" (Husks)

Posted Image Posted Image

that reminds me a little of collectores. a mothership with the small ships

further

Let's make no mistake about it. Shepard is from beginning the hero. The white knight with lance and shield.
I'm so, that is mentioned sometimes that Shepard is such a weapon. The lance in the war against the reaper
Oh not forget. A team member dies. In Digimon Tamers Leomon - In Mass Effect Kaidan/Ashley

Is it a coincidence that the plot is so similar? Even the names.

The only difference is just the intervention of the player in Mass Effect.

What are you think? 

(Forget this time that it is an anime series and concentrate only on the course.)

Modifié par Dukemon, 01 février 2014 - 10:52 .


#2
Arcian

Arcian
  • Members
  • 2 470 messages
Its a generic sci-fi formula with roots in early science fiction literature.

#3
SwobyJ

SwobyJ
  • Members
  • 7 375 messages
What Arcian said. Doesn't mean there's nothing to learn, but that sometimes its just references. Eventually, the staples of sci-fi will become not just writing tools, but outright mythology (imo).