1033 réponses à ce sujet

[KC_Prototype]

Fiona isn't Alistair's mom, His mom was a servant to King Maric.

[Lulupab]

KC_Prototype wrote...

Fiona isn't Alistair's mom, His mom was a servant to King Maric.

Lel. You need to stop believing everything you hear in the game. Fiona exacted a promise from Maric that their son would be told his mother was a human and had died, while Duncan promised to watch over him. 

So the servant thing could be a lie, which I think it is.

[Enigmatick]

For a second I thought this was a thread for Fiddles fans.

[Br3admax]

KC_Prototype wrote...

Fiona isn't Alistair's mom, His mom was a servant to King Maric.

This doesn't even match what was told in game, which was shacky at best. 

[Redhead]

About Alistair being Fiona's son - it's impossible in fact.

If you played DA:O and spared Loghain, you can ask him why Maric didn't acknowledge Alistair. His response is: "It would have ruined Rowan" (whole dialogue is here: , it starts on 13:33)

It means that queen Rowan was still alive when Alistair was born. And if you read The Calling, you know that Maric met Fiona three years after Rowan's death.

Modifié par etain44, 02 février 2014 - 06:17 .

[Hanako Ikezawa]

etain44 wrote...

About Alistair being Fiona's son - it's impossible in fact.

If you played DA:O and spared Loghain, you can ask him why Maric didn't acknowledge Alistair. His response is: "It would have ruined Rowan" (whole dialogue is here: , it starts on 13:33)

It means that queen Rowan was still alive when Alistair was born. And if you read The Calling, you know that Maric met Fiona three years after Rowan's death.

Not necessarily. Loghain could be talking about how Rowan would have viewed in history. His dialogue can go both ways.

[Redhead]

Later (14:03) he says: "What do you think would have become of Alistair, if Maric had claimed him? He would have been the bastard prince, and a continual reminder to Rowan of Maric's infidelity."
Well, i really don't think dead Rowan would have some problems with Maric's erotic life...

[Hanako Ikezawa]

etain44 wrote...

Later (14:03) he says: "What do you think would have become of Alistair, if Maric had claimed him? He would have been the bastard prince, and a continual reminder to Rowan of Maric's infidelity."
Well, i really don't think dead Rowan would have some problems with Maric's erotic life...

Considering they believe in an afterlife, I think no longer being in the World of the Living will blind Rowan of her husband's womanizing. 

And besides, that doesn't help the case against the theory anyway. Whether from Fiona or the maid shouldn't have mattered to Rowan since she is dead at the time and both children, assuming they are different, were born the same year so she wouldn't have known of either one.

Modifié par LDS Darth Revan, 02 février 2014 - 06:44 .

[duckley]

etain44 wrote...

Later (14:03) he says: "What do you think would have become of Alistair, if Maric had claimed him? He would have been the bastard prince, and a continual reminder to Rowan of Maric's infidelity."
Well, i really don't think dead Rowan would have some problems with Maric's erotic life...

Yes - I thought Marric got together with Fiona after Rowan died.

And BTW - IMO if Maric had any unowhats he would have raised Alistair himself.

[Redhead]

LDS Darth Revan wrote...

etain44 wrote...

Later (14:03) he says: "What do you think would have become of Alistair, if Maric had claimed him? He would have been the bastard prince, and a continual reminder to Rowan of Maric's infidelity."
Well, i really don't think dead Rowan would have some problems with Maric's erotic life...

Considering they believe in an afterlife, I think no longer being in the World of the Living will blind Rowan of her husband's womanizing. 

And besides, that doesn't help the case against the theory anyway. Whether from Fiona or the maid shouldn't have mattered to Rowan since she is dead at the time and both children, assuming they are different, were born the same year so she wouldn't have known of either one.

I just checked, and you're right: Alistair was born in 9:10, and The Calling is set approximately in...  yeah, 9:10. Well, someone made a huge mistake with timing... or Rowan was jealous even after death

[Hanako Ikezawa]

etain44 wrote...

LDS Darth Revan wrote...

etain44 wrote...

Later (14:03) he says: "What do you think would have become of Alistair, if Maric had claimed him? He would have been the bastard prince, and a continual reminder to Rowan of Maric's infidelity."
Well, i really don't think dead Rowan would have some problems with Maric's erotic life...

Considering they believe in an afterlife, I think no longer being in the World of the Living will blind Rowan of her husband's womanizing. 

And besides, that doesn't help the case against the theory anyway. Whether from Fiona or the maid shouldn't have mattered to Rowan since she is dead at the time and both children, assuming they are different, were born the same year so she wouldn't have known of either one.

I just checked, and you're right: Alistair was born in 9:10, and The Calling is set approximately in...  yeah, 9:10. Well, someone made a huge mistake with timing... or Rowan was jealous even after death

Probably the former, since one line slip ups do happen in storytelling due to different people writing different yet connected scenes at the same time, though the image of Rowan's ghost haunting Maric is a humorous one.
"You couldn't even wait a couple years after I died before sleeping with other women?":P

Modifié par LDS Darth Revan, 02 février 2014 - 07:00 .

[Knight of Dane]

The Dragon Age timeline is filled with hiccups.

[LPPrince]

That it is, Dane.

[Hellion Rex]

Burn the witch!

[Hanako Ikezawa]

eluvianix wrote...

Burn the witch!

I always read that in Littlekuriboh's Tristan voice.

Modifié par LDS Darth Revan, 02 février 2014 - 07:24 .

[Lulupab]

I think Fiona will do the burning.

[Hellion Rex]

Rassler wrote...

I think Fiona will do the burning.

Not if my Inquisitor immolates her first.

[The Elder King]

eluvianix wrote...

Rassler wrote...

I think Fiona will do the burning.

Not if my Inquisitor immolates her first.

After Adrian, of course:devil:.

[Lulupab]

You evil betrayer bastards. You are a disgrace to all mages. (that is if you plan on immolating them with magic not explosives)

Modifié par Rassler, 02 février 2014 - 07:53 .

[Hellion Rex]

Rassler wrote...

You evil betrayer bastards. You are a disgrace to all mages. (that is if you plan on immolating them with magic not explosives)

Oh no. Don't worry. I have a lightning bolt for Adrian and an Inferno for Fiona.

[Noctis Augustus]

All this talk about "peace"... Pathetic. Let's just crush anyone that opposes the mages. Their blood will not go to waste.

Yes, she'll do well as a figurehead leader and the Inquisitor will pull the strings from the shadows.

[AresKeith]

Rassler wrote...

You evil betrayer bastards. You are a disgrace to all mages. (that is if you plan on immolating them with magic not explosives)

Indeed Fiona, Adrian, and Anders are 

[Lulupab]

eluvianix wrote...

Rassler wrote...

You evil betrayer bastards. You are a disgrace to all mages. (that is if you plan on immolating them with magic not explosives)

Oh no. Don't worry. I have a lightning bolt for Adrian and an Inferno for Fiona.

On a serious note now that I think about it Fiona has done nothing immoral. She does not even want pure mage freedom she just want the circles to rule themselves and be free of Templars. I actually think that system could work with some tweaks here and there.

[Lulupab]

AresKeith wrote...

Rassler wrote...

You evil betrayer bastards. You are a disgrace to all mages. (that is if you plan on immolating them with magic not explosives)

Indeed Fiona, Adrian, and Anders are 

I can understand why you think that way about Anders and Adrian. But Fiona? That is just preposterous. Refer to my post above.