Aller au contenu

Photo

Do you consider Anders to be manipulative?


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
501 réponses à ce sujet

#376
Lulupab

Lulupab
  • Members
  • 5 455 messages

Celtic Latino wrote...

His whole DA2 romance hinged on the idea that you supported the mages and he 'liked' you for it. Honestly I don't even think he liked Hawke at all but used him/her and played with his/her emotions. Think about it. If you flirted with Anders, he kept whining about the mages while putting on a 'poor sorry me' act. He claimed he loved you in order for you to keep doing his bidding. Especially towards the last part, where Anders used emotional blackmail to get you to 'gather his materials', that right there said everything.

He's very manipulative. Which is one of the main reasons he gets the murder knife in most of my DA2 runs when he's not ignored or pushed to the side. Even when Hawke's mother died he's just like "I hope you know not all mages are like that...". He's selfish and manipulative. Whoever wrote him clearly intended for him to be hated.


If you do not support what Anders wants or don't agree with his view points then why are you even interested in him? If you like how he looks like one night stands are possible with all LI's. The whole point of relationship is agreement and sharing. You have neither with Anders. Leave Anders to Anders fans and move on. We like the character: we don't necessarily agree with his actions. Those of us who do agree with his actions understand the difference between a fantasy game and real life, and would almost certainly find the same actions taking place in the real world completely repugnant. Fantasy and role-playing games allow us to explore more morally grey areas without any harm done to actual people. We wouldn't condone most of the things Hawke does in Kirkwall in real life, and Anders' actions are no different.

That being said Anders' conversation at the end of the game before facing Meredith is one the best and most romantic because he is the only one who talks about togetherness forever even settling down but as fugitives lol and if Hawke is female he will talk about future children!  So yes he is serious in his romance.

Also no he was not intended to be hated, David Gaider:

My impression is that reactions to Anders runs the complete gamut from adoration to loathing. Considering what he does at the end of Dragon Age 2, that’s totally expected. He’s a polarizing character, and responses to that last act of his seem to vary from betrayal (“God dammit, Anders!”) to rage (“It was as if everything I despise about him exploded all over me… in a, uh, totally non-sexual way!”) to indignation (“Why didn’t he just ask me— I would have helped him!”) to support (“He’s awesome. Fight the power!”). Which has been interesting to watch, from my perspective. I wouldn’t call any of those the right reaction… he’s in the game to make you react somehow, and he succeeded admirably in that respect.

Modifié par Rassler, 05 février 2014 - 04:26 .


#377
The Hierophant

The Hierophant
  • Members
  • 6 932 messages
Rassler, the op asks if people considered Anders manipulative, and Celtic's response is on topic. I didn't see it stated that this thread is intended to be fan thread. Your response is coming across like a fan fueled dismissal of criticisms you can't counter.

Plus all DG said in your quote is that people had a wide array of reactions to Anders, who's also in the game to make people react somehow, and believes that it's a success. Nowhere does DG state that he didn't intend for Anders to be hated or disliked.

#378
Celtic Latino

Celtic Latino
  • Members
  • 1 347 messages

Rassler wrote...

Celtic Latino wrote...

His whole DA2 romance hinged on the idea that you supported the mages and he 'liked' you for it. Honestly I don't even think he liked Hawke at all but used him/her and played with his/her emotions. Think about it. If you flirted with Anders, he kept whining about the mages while putting on a 'poor sorry me' act. He claimed he loved you in order for you to keep doing his bidding. Especially towards the last part, where Anders used emotional blackmail to get you to 'gather his materials', that right there said everything.

He's very manipulative. Which is one of the main reasons he gets the murder knife in most of my DA2 runs when he's not ignored or pushed to the side. Even when Hawke's mother died he's just like "I hope you know not all mages are like that...". He's selfish and manipulative. Whoever wrote him clearly intended for him to be hated.


If you do not support what Anders wants or don't agree with his view points then why are you even interested in him? If you like how he looks like one night stands are possible with all LI's. The whole point of relationship is agreement and sharing. You have neither with Anders. Leave Anders to Anders fans and move on. We like the character: we don't necessarily agree with his actions. Those of us who do agree with his actions understand the difference between a fantasy game and real life, and would almost certainly find the same actions taking place in the real world completely repugnant. Fantasy and role-playing games allow us to explore more morally grey areas without any harm done to actual people. We wouldn't condone most of the things Hawke does in Kirkwall in real life, and Anders' actions are no different.

That being said Anders' conversation at the end of the game before facing Meredith is one the best and most romantic because he is the only one who talks about togetherness forever even settling down but as fugitives lol and if Hawke is female he will talk about future children!  So yes he is serious in his romance.

Also no he was not intended to be hated, David Gaider:

My impression is that reactions to Anders runs the complete gamut from adoration to loathing. Considering what he does at the end of Dragon Age 2, that’s totally expected. He’s a polarizing character, and responses to that last act of his seem to vary from betrayal (“God dammit, Anders!”) to rage (“It was as if everything I despise about him exploded all over me… in a, uh, totally non-sexual way!”) to indignation (“Why didn’t he just ask me— I would have helped him!”) to support (“He’s awesome. Fight the power!”). Which has been interesting to watch, from my perspective. I wouldn’t call any of those the right reaction… he’s in the game to make you react somehow, and he succeeded admirably in that respect.





Why did I romance Anders if I so much as disagree (not that I need permission)? Different characters, different points of view. Doesn't need to agree or coincide with my own. Plus I wanted to 'give Anders another chance' by trying a romance arc with him on one of my DA2 runs. Just like you said about fantasy and roleplaying games and the avenues they explore (which I'm well aware of by the way, no need to remind me as I know the difference between fantasy and reality), my PCs are a variety. I've romanced all companions, as I do every (or most) BioWare games. The character is not me. 

And the OP's question is whether or not I found Anders manipulative. I provided my personal opinion as to why. I never hated on those who thought differently. I do just that and leave Anders to Anders fans. But it doesn't mean I can't provide my opinion on a thread that obviously asked on thoughts. Last I checked it wasn't a 'fan thread'. If it was I wouldn't have bothered.

I personally did not find Anders to be serious in his romance, but rather manipulative. That's my opinion. You're free to disagree. And yes, I do think whoever wrote him, to illicit strong reactions, whether extreme dislike or love, wrote him obviously well. Just because I don't like a character doesn't mean I don't think he/she is not well written. 

It seems I struck a nerve...on a side note Rassler you ought to check the OP topic before going on a rude rant at someone. I know the difference between fantasy and reality because I don't feel the need to berate someone and provide condescending remarks for disliking a character that I like. ^_^

Modifié par Celtic Latino, 05 février 2014 - 05:17 .


#379
Lulupab

Lulupab
  • Members
  • 5 455 messages

The Hierophant wrote...

Rassler, the op asks if people considered Anders manipulative, and Celtic's response is on topic. I didn't see it stated that this thread is intended to be fan thread. Your response is coming across like a fan fueled dismissal of criticisms you can't counter.

Plus all DG said in your quote is that people had a wide array of reactions to Anders, who's also in the game to make people react somehow, and believes that it's a success. Nowhere does DG state that he didn't intend for Anders to be hated or disliked.


Well to be honest this thread is no longer about manipulation since page one, its sometimes about Anders.:unsure:

And DG said none of the reactions is the right one meaning no specific reaction namely hate was intended but all of reactions were. I don't see how this is hard to understand. 

We've been doing that "fan fueled dismissal of criticisms we can't counter" for two thousands of pages in DA2 forum. We can indeed counter it, logically, literally or otherwise but its a headache and I as an Anders fan required to do nothing least of all countering an argument. You want an arguement? I enjoy killing pixelated characters who I don't like, sometimes random characters even I also very much enjoyed destruction of a pixelated building which I hated since the start of the game. None of which exist in real life. Like I committed genocides in GTA. Its a video game god damn it not reality, I consider any of named actions in reality to be horrible and dispicable. Now do you want a crying shoulder for how Anders manipulated you? Isabela tune: you poor thing. :lol: 

Most of my arguments about Anders that mostly happened outside of this thread was my defending the fact that backstabbing Anders doesn't help anyone but this idea is not even that imortant especially now that almost all players have an extra savegame file that Anders is alive in it and they will try to see the consequences of that in DA:I.

#380
Lulupab

Lulupab
  • Members
  • 5 455 messages

Celtic Latino wrote...

Rassler wrote...

Celtic Latino wrote...

His whole DA2 romance hinged on the idea that you supported the mages and he 'liked' you for it. Honestly I don't even think he liked Hawke at all but used him/her and played with his/her emotions. Think about it. If you flirted with Anders, he kept whining about the mages while putting on a 'poor sorry me' act. He claimed he loved you in order for you to keep doing his bidding. Especially towards the last part, where Anders used emotional blackmail to get you to 'gather his materials', that right there said everything.

He's very manipulative. Which is one of the main reasons he gets the murder knife in most of my DA2 runs when he's not ignored or pushed to the side. Even when Hawke's mother died he's just like "I hope you know not all mages are like that...". He's selfish and manipulative. Whoever wrote him clearly intended for him to be hated.


If you do not support what Anders wants or don't agree with his view points then why are you even interested in him? If you like how he looks like one night stands are possible with all LI's. The whole point of relationship is agreement and sharing. You have neither with Anders. Leave Anders to Anders fans and move on. We like the character: we don't necessarily agree with his actions. Those of us who do agree with his actions understand the difference between a fantasy game and real life, and would almost certainly find the same actions taking place in the real world completely repugnant. Fantasy and role-playing games allow us to explore more morally grey areas without any harm done to actual people. We wouldn't condone most of the things Hawke does in Kirkwall in real life, and Anders' actions are no different.

That being said Anders' conversation at the end of the game before facing Meredith is one the best and most romantic because he is the only one who talks about togetherness forever even settling down but as fugitives lol and if Hawke is female he will talk about future children!  So yes he is serious in his romance.

Also no he was not intended to be hated, David Gaider:

My impression is that reactions to Anders runs the complete gamut from adoration to loathing. Considering what he does at the end of Dragon Age 2, that’s totally expected. He’s a polarizing character, and responses to that last act of his seem to vary from betrayal (“God dammit, Anders!”) to rage (“It was as if everything I despise about him exploded all over me… in a, uh, totally non-sexual way!”) to indignation (“Why didn’t he just ask me— I would have helped him!”) to support (“He’s awesome. Fight the power!”). Which has been interesting to watch, from my perspective. I wouldn’t call any of those the right reaction… he’s in the game to make you react somehow, and he succeeded admirably in that respect.





Why did I romance Anders if I so much as disagree (not that I need permission)? Different characters, different points of view. Doesn't need to agree or coincide with my own. Plus I wanted to 'give Anders another chance' by trying a romance arc with him on one of my DA2 runs. Just like you said about fantasy and roleplaying games and the avenues they explore (which I'm well aware of by the way, no need to remind me as I know the difference between fantasy and reality), my PCs are a variety. I've romanced all companions, as I do every (or most) BioWare games. The character is not me. 

And the OP's question is whether or not I found Anders manipulative. I provided my personal opinion as to why. I never hated on those who thought differently. I do just that and leave Anders to Anders fans. But it doesn't mean I can't provide my opinion on a thread that obviously asked on thoughts. Last I checked it wasn't a 'fan thread'. If it was I wouldn't have bothered.

I personally did not find Anders to be serious in his romance, but rather manipulative. That's my opinion. You're free to disagree. And yes, I do think whoever wrote him, to illicit strong reactions, whether extreme dislike or love, wrote him obviously well. Just because I don't like a character doesn't mean I don't think he/she is not well written. 

It seems I struck a nerve...on a side note Rassler you ought to check the OP topic before going on a rude rant at someone. I know the difference between fantasy and reality because I don't feel the need to berate someone and provide condescending remarks for disliking a character that I like. ^_^


I don't see how it was a rant, least of all rude. You said you don't like him for your own reasons and I said based on reasons you provided you can never like him, you might even have a hard time faking it just to fit a personality for your hawke. Honey you haven't seen me rude, trust me. ;)

Also as I said before the OP is long gone, have you checked the thread? For last 10 pages this is not about manipulation anymore. Hence we were lucky to have some pages about Anders himself. You should have read the other pages about how every single companion manipulates Hawke just on a different scale. People always disagree but there is no need to jump into conclusions that they are rude in doing so.

#381
Celtic Latino

Celtic Latino
  • Members
  • 1 347 messages

Rassler wrote...

Celtic Latino wrote...

Rassler wrote...

Celtic Latino wrote...

His whole DA2 romance hinged on the idea that you supported the mages and he 'liked' you for it. Honestly I don't even think he liked Hawke at all but used him/her and played with his/her emotions. Think about it. If you flirted with Anders, he kept whining about the mages while putting on a 'poor sorry me' act. He claimed he loved you in order for you to keep doing his bidding. Especially towards the last part, where Anders used emotional blackmail to get you to 'gather his materials', that right there said everything.

He's very manipulative. Which is one of the main reasons he gets the murder knife in most of my DA2 runs when he's not ignored or pushed to the side. Even when Hawke's mother died he's just like "I hope you know not all mages are like that...". He's selfish and manipulative. Whoever wrote him clearly intended for him to be hated.


If you do not support what Anders wants or don't agree with his view points then why are you even interested in him? If you like how he looks like one night stands are possible with all LI's. The whole point of relationship is agreement and sharing. You have neither with Anders. Leave Anders to Anders fans and move on. We like the character: we don't necessarily agree with his actions. Those of us who do agree with his actions understand the difference between a fantasy game and real life, and would almost certainly find the same actions taking place in the real world completely repugnant. Fantasy and role-playing games allow us to explore more morally grey areas without any harm done to actual people. We wouldn't condone most of the things Hawke does in Kirkwall in real life, and Anders' actions are no different.

That being said Anders' conversation at the end of the game before facing Meredith is one the best and most romantic because he is the only one who talks about togetherness forever even settling down but as fugitives lol and if Hawke is female he will talk about future children!  So yes he is serious in his romance.

Also no he was not intended to be hated, David Gaider:

My impression is that reactions to Anders runs the complete gamut from adoration to loathing. Considering what he does at the end of Dragon Age 2, that’s totally expected. He’s a polarizing character, and responses to that last act of his seem to vary from betrayal (“God dammit, Anders!”) to rage (“It was as if everything I despise about him exploded all over me… in a, uh, totally non-sexual way!”) to indignation (“Why didn’t he just ask me— I would have helped him!”) to support (“He’s awesome. Fight the power!”). Which has been interesting to watch, from my perspective. I wouldn’t call any of those the right reaction… he’s in the game to make you react somehow, and he succeeded admirably in that respect.





Why did I romance Anders if I so much as disagree (not that I need permission)? Different characters, different points of view. Doesn't need to agree or coincide with my own. Plus I wanted to 'give Anders another chance' by trying a romance arc with him on one of my DA2 runs. Just like you said about fantasy and roleplaying games and the avenues they explore (which I'm well aware of by the way, no need to remind me as I know the difference between fantasy and reality), my PCs are a variety. I've romanced all companions, as I do every (or most) BioWare games. The character is not me. 

And the OP's question is whether or not I found Anders manipulative. I provided my personal opinion as to why. I never hated on those who thought differently. I do just that and leave Anders to Anders fans. But it doesn't mean I can't provide my opinion on a thread that obviously asked on thoughts. Last I checked it wasn't a 'fan thread'. If it was I wouldn't have bothered.

I personally did not find Anders to be serious in his romance, but rather manipulative. That's my opinion. You're free to disagree. And yes, I do think whoever wrote him, to illicit strong reactions, whether extreme dislike or love, wrote him obviously well. Just because I don't like a character doesn't mean I don't think he/she is not well written. 

It seems I struck a nerve...on a side note Rassler you ought to check the OP topic before going on a rude rant at someone. I know the difference between fantasy and reality because I don't feel the need to berate someone and provide condescending remarks for disliking a character that I like. ^_^


I don't see how it was a rant, least of all rude. You said you don't like him for your own reasons and I said based on reasons you provided you can never like him, you might even have a hard time faking it just to fit a personality for your hawke. Honey you haven't seen me rude, trust me. ;)

Also as I said before the OP is long gone, have you checked the thread? For last 10 pages this is not about manipulation anymore. Hence we were lucky to have some pages about Anders himself. You should have read the other pages about how every single companion manipulates Hawke just on a different scale. People always disagree but there is no need to jump into conclusions that they are rude in doing so.


All right, I'll call a truce and leave it at that. We'll agree to disagree as far as Anders goes B) and reading through the thread I do see the points you bring up. And you are right on how other companions manipulate Hawke. I guess I just saw Anders as the strongest personally, which is likely my reason for feeling he strikes me as the more manipulative of them all. Although, I do think about how he could potentially save Bethany/Carver in the Deep Roads (showing a more altruistic side), I'll give him that. Which is why there have been times I spared him. I do give credit where its due. 

Modifié par Celtic Latino, 05 février 2014 - 06:32 .


#382
Fredward

Fredward
  • Members
  • 4 994 messages
I like Anders but that emotional blackmail thing he pulled if you romanced him was noooooot cool. If it was real life I probably would have killed him after he blew up the Chantry simply for the personal betrayal. But on the whole I don't think he's particularly manipulative. Now that he's succeeded in starting his war I see him relying a lot more on brute force and a lot less subversion.

#383
The Hierophant

The Hierophant
  • Members
  • 6 932 messages
Sorry Rassler but No. Anders is still a manipulative, self righteous, cannibalistic, mentally unstable abomination. People can enjoy his character but him being a video game character doesn't negate any criticism of his actions. While Hawke killing a few street thugs is in no way comparable to Anders trying to instigate an international conflict.

Plus Anders whole Charles Manson esque cult of personality is creepy. There's no ifs, ands or buts about it. No negotiations, no nothing.

#384
LPPrince

LPPrince
  • Members
  • 54 947 messages
Given I didn't have my FemHawke romance him, I can't touch too much on it, but if he really did try to emotionally blackmail his romantic partner while lying through his asking for aid, thats a sign of an abusive partner. Eww. Thats like Edward Cullen eww.

I'd call that manipulative.

#385
The Flying Grey Warden

The Flying Grey Warden
  • Members
  • 950 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

The Flying Grey Warden wrote...

So why would a cure that only the templars know about and are allowed to enact, that was well regulated and would have the same stringent and heavily safeguard method of criteria that judging someone to be tranquiled would be employed, would lead to mass murder and the destruction of all things the circle holds dear.


I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Awkward syntax. I assume you were responding to me?

The Templars wouldn't be the only ones to know about it because the cured-Tranquil would also know, even if the Templars finished the cure in secret without the mages or divine knowing. Unless you intend to lock the cured Tranquil in solitary away from everyone else for all time, the news will get to the mages. Which, of course, would invite their own attempts to recreate: knowing something is possible is half the difficulty in creation, as a professor once told me.

The rest is a matter of simple crime. The Templars can be the only ones allowed to enact it, but it's irrelevant if the knowledge escapes their control. Just one mage with mind-control, chantry sympathizer, mundane theif, or Templar defector or corruption needs to be successful to leak the secret, and the maleficar networks can do the rest to preserve and spread the knowledge around. Given the potency of what's at stake, and the possible rewards, I wouldn't bet too much on it being a long-lived secret once people realize the Templars have it.

Once the knoweldge spreads, the Templar monopology can't be relied upon to prevent tranquil from being cured. That undermines the premise of letting people go Tranquil in the first place, and that in turn challenges the Harrowing. Changing the Harrowing by removing the third option is a scenario no one wants: either executions go up to compensate for the lack of Tranquility, or the quality of 'reliable' mages goes down as the prior tranquility candidates enter the mage pool.

Unintended consequence? Certainly. But second and third-order effects usually are.




You have a lot of ifs and ands that when applyed to dragon age sort of fall apart. Such as the harrowing, an act that every mage goes through, but doesn't tell anyone about, and nobody is decrying about how the harrowing will become public knowledge and lead to the apocolypse of the chantry system and all of thedas, which you seem to do. Nobody locks up the harrowed mages in isolated cells away from other mages and yet nobody blabs to the non-harrowed mages about what goes on either, so I think we'll be good on the secrecy department.

And the tranquiled aren't that common outside of the circle, not in the numbers that having a tranquility cure might cause a apocalypse. It would require maleficarum not only to know the secret, but have the neccisary tools needed to preform the ritual, and get their hands on just the right tranquiled that they can somehow use it to their advantage in some way that you don't even specify. What would happen if all the tranquiled who operated outside the circle were voluntary tranquiled? Have all the blood mage ones stay in the circle and preform the duties that the tranquilled do. Now you could argue that the maleficarum might infiltrate the circle, but if they have infiltrated the circle, what is going to be so much worse about them knowing how to reverse tranquility, in fact why would they do that when they can just assassinate the knight commander, or open a fade tear in the circle? Maleficarum infiltration is already dangerous regardless of knowing how to reverse tranquility or not, so that is completely irrelevant to the discussion.

Which really leaves only one possible threat, the tranquiled themselves. But not even that could be a threat as the tranquiled don't care about feeling again, or at least don't seem to want to. I doubt the tranquiled would go around, curing themselves left and right, even without being asked not to, because they would reason that they are already comfortable as they are and thus do not need alteration or reversion in order to feel good or complete. And even if a former tranquiled wanted to do that, he would still lack the neccisary resources needed, which would be under templar control IE lots of lyrium, to actually complete any such ritual. And if he turned to blood magic to try it you may ask? Well then treat him like any other blood mage, it's back to being tranquil with you. Sorry, you violated your parole.

And it'll change the harrowing? Seriously? You don't give evidence for why that would happen. You just blurt it out and expect us to accep it at face value.

#386
Han Shot First

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 199 messages
He was manipulative.

Now he's food for crows.

#387
Lulupab

Lulupab
  • Members
  • 5 455 messages

The Hierophant wrote...

Sorry Rassler but No. Anders is still a manipulative, self righteous, cannibalistic, mentally unstable abomination. People can enjoy his character but him being a video game character doesn't negate any criticism of his actions. While Hawke killing a few street thugs is in no way comparable to Anders trying to instigate an international conflict.

Plus Anders whole Charles Manson esque cult of personality is creepy. There's no ifs, ands or buts about it. No negotiations, no nothing.


Well Hawke can have different personalities. Hawke can be much more extreme than Anders, by promising Justice together they will kill every last Templar and acceps nothing short than overthrow of Templars. Hakwe can tell Anders why the hell he hid things from Hawke and amusingly selecing the mentioned conversation wheel makes Hawke admit he would have helped Anders destroy the chantry with pleasure.

See? Since this is a video game people can hate the chantry's gut and enjoy its dectruction, the game has created a personality for it.

Modifié par Rassler, 05 février 2014 - 11:54 .


#388
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 683 messages

Banxey2 wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Banxey2 wrote...

addiction21 wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

More like he was mad that Justinia was doing all of this behind his back, even though she really didn't need his permission.


To keep the Nevarren Accord yes she at the very least needed to inform him of it. 

You even say it she "was doing all of this behind his back" . No **** such a betrayal of trust is going to cause drama no matter the good intentions.


It wasn't behind his back. The Seekers are agents of the Divine. They're not equals. She doesn't have to share things with him. Clearly his personal issues dictate that he can't be trusted, because he wasn't doing as he was told by his superior. 

The Seekers aren't agents of the Divine by inherent authority: they subordinated themselves by a  agreement. The agreement doesn't go away once they are subordinate. They are not equals, but the superior does not have unlimited authority or freedom either. The root of authority is conditional to the agreement remaining intact.

If a leader by voluntary consent of the subordinate renenges on the deal that made them leader, then the leader loses the foundation of the authority. The subordinate has no obligation to remain as such, since the premise of the relationship derives from the priorities of the agreement that brought the union.

The other poster said that it was against the Nevarran Accord, and that what she did (organising an investigation) was behind his back. We don't know any specifics of the agreement, other than the Inquisition was to submit to the Divine's authority. The Seekers have their duties clearly defined, there's nothing in any of the information I've read which suggests that investigating methods of dealing with mages require the Lord Seeker's attention or authorisation.

What happened in the White Spire is a different matter, of course. But in regards to the investigation, I can't see how his duties come into conflict with the Divine's investigation.

If we don't know the specifics of the agreement, how can you say the duties are clearly defined? That's an inherent contradiction of points. If you don't know the foundational agreement, you have no basis for claiming you understand the implications for what is and is not tolerable.

The duty/investigation conflict comes from the practical implications of what the existence of a full cure has for the Circle System, which is part of the duty of the Templars to maintain.

#389
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 683 messages

Rassler wrote...

The Hierophant wrote...

Rassler, the op asks if people considered Anders manipulative, and Celtic's response is on topic. I didn't see it stated that this thread is intended to be fan thread. Your response is coming across like a fan fueled dismissal of criticisms you can't counter.

Plus all DG said in your quote is that people had a wide array of reactions to Anders, who's also in the game to make people react somehow, and believes that it's a success. Nowhere does DG state that he didn't intend for Anders to be hated or disliked.


Well to be honest this thread is no longer about manipulation since page one, its sometimes about Anders.:unsure:

You are not responding to an amorphous thread. You are responding to individuals. Show some respect to other people and read what you are replying to.

And DG said none of the reactions is the right one meaning no specific reaction namely hate was intended but all of reactions were. I don't see how this is hard to understand.

Because that is not what the language means or a logical conclusion, and does not support your prior claims.

No specific reaction being intended does not mean all possible reactions were. There is no logical inherency in this, because there can easily be a spectrum of intended reactions and still be reactions to the stimulus that were not. 'Anders I hate you' was intended: 'Anders I think you should have desecrated the corpse in obscenely graphic ways' was probably not.

None of which is relevant to whether Anders as oppossed to his stimulus, was expected or intended to be received one way or another. Saying 'Anders was intended as a stimulus with a number of reactions' is not the same as saying 'Anders was intended to be morally gray' or 'Anders was intended to be popular' or 'Anders was intended to be seen as right.' You have been misusing David Gaider's quote to support claims it does not support.

We've been doing that "fan fueled dismissal of criticisms we can't counter" for two thousands of pages in DA2 forum. We can indeed counter it, logically, literally or otherwise but its a headache and I as an Anders fan required to do nothing least of all countering an argument. You want an arguement? I enjoy killing pixelated characters who I don't like, sometimes random characters even I also very much enjoyed destruction of a pixelated building which I hated since the start of the game. None of which exist in real life. Like I committed genocides in GTA. Its a video game god damn it not reality, I consider any of named actions in reality to be horrible and dispicable. Now do you want a crying shoulder for how Anders manipulated you? Isabela tune: you poor thing. :lol: 

You do realize you just said a huge '**** you, I don't need to address anything you say' to the person you tore into, right?

Because that would make you a collossal dick.

Most of my arguments about Anders that mostly happened outside of this thread was my defending the fact that backstabbing Anders doesn't help anyone but this idea is not even that imortant especially now that almost all players have an extra savegame file that Anders is alive in it and they will try to see the consequences of that in DA:I.

Your arguments outside of this thread have no relevance to your arguments in this thread, or to the people and their topic in it. Your consistent lines of argument about Anders in this thread has never been centered around the killing or Anders or advocating sparing him.

#390
Banxey

Banxey
  • Members
  • 1 306 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Banxey2 wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

Banxey2 wrote...

addiction21 wrote...

eluvianix wrote...

More like he was mad that Justinia was doing all of this behind his back, even though she really didn't need his permission.


To keep the Nevarren Accord yes she at the very least needed to inform him of it. 

You even say it she "was doing all of this behind his back" . No **** such a betrayal of trust is going to cause drama no matter the good intentions.


It wasn't behind his back. The Seekers are agents of the Divine. They're not equals. She doesn't have to share things with him. Clearly his personal issues dictate that he can't be trusted, because he wasn't doing as he was told by his superior. 

The Seekers aren't agents of the Divine by inherent authority: they subordinated themselves by a  agreement. The agreement doesn't go away once they are subordinate. They are not equals, but the superior does not have unlimited authority or freedom either. The root of authority is conditional to the agreement remaining intact.

If a leader by voluntary consent of the subordinate renenges on the deal that made them leader, then the leader loses the foundation of the authority. The subordinate has no obligation to remain as such, since the premise of the relationship derives from the priorities of the agreement that brought the union.

The other poster said that it was against the Nevarran Accord, and that what she did (organising an investigation) was behind his back. We don't know any specifics of the agreement, other than the Inquisition was to submit to the Divine's authority. The Seekers have their duties clearly defined, there's nothing in any of the information I've read which suggests that investigating methods of dealing with mages require the Lord Seeker's attention or authorisation.

What happened in the White Spire is a different matter, of course. But in regards to the investigation, I can't see how his duties come into conflict with the Divine's investigation.

If we don't know the specifics of the agreement, how can you say the duties are clearly defined? That's an inherent contradiction of points. If you don't know the foundational agreement, you have no basis for claiming you understand the implications for what is and is not tolerable.

The duty/investigation conflict comes from the practical implications of what the existence of a full cure has for the Circle System, which is part of the duty of the Templars to maintain.

I meant defined by the game lore, not the agreement. The Seekers' original function was to root out problems within the Templars. Gaider likened them to Internal Affairs. They are below the Divine in the pecking order, as Lambert can't override her orders in Asunder. But yes, there could be a point where he can. I admit I can't argue your point in that regard, there could be more to the agreement. All I have done is speculate on what I know from what I've read. 

#391
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

cjones91 wrote...
Non mages are not a seperate race,you may think they are but that does'nt make it so.
Justinia,Leliana,and Evangeline did'nt "betray" anyone.

Race is not the sole factor that establishes different groups. And the mages are very much a different group; their biology is different, they live apart, they follow different customs and laws and their interests rarely coincide with the interests of the nations created by normal people. They are, both biologically and socially a different group from normal people, that is unquestionable.

Those three women belong to the group of normal people, more specifically, that of orlesians(because they do not have the gene necessary to produce magic and they have never lived inside the culture of a Circle) and they have positions of authority within important organizations that provide much for normal people in general and orlesians in particular. Therefore, they have a duty to their people to perform their functions to the best of their ability.
Some of these duties include keeping mages within the Circles and maintain the peace. By aiding in their escape which subsequently lead to the current war, they have placed the interests of mages above that of the normal people. Because their interests are very much different; normal people wish for safety and peace while the mages wish for their freedom even if they have to fight a war for it.

Therefore, Justinia, Leliana and Evangeline are very much traitors not just to their country but to their people all over Thedas. 

#392
ImperatorMortis

ImperatorMortis
  • Members
  • 2 571 messages

MisterJB wrote...


Therefore, Justinia, Leliana and Evangeline are very much traitors not just to their country but to their people all over Thedas. 


Lol "traitors"

>Implying that they're obligated to them in anyway

I would laugh in the face of anyone who said anything like that to me. Kind of reminds of some dudes I knew who considered others dudes or girls who dated/reproduced outside their race as "traitors". 

Modifié par ImperatorMortis, 05 février 2014 - 01:18 .


#393
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

ImperatorMortis wrote...

MisterJB wrote...


Therefore, Justinia, Leliana and Evangeline are very much traitors not just to their country but to their people all over Thedas. 


Lol "traitors"

>Implying that they're obligated to them in anyway

I would laugh in the face of anyone who said anything like that to me. Kind of reminds of some dudes I knew who considered others dudes or girls who dated/reproduced outside their race as "traitors". 

We're not talking about random people on the street, we're talking about a Templar, the Divine and her left hand, people who have high ranking positions within institutions so, yes. They very much have an obligation to the citizens of Orlais and if you were a cop that released a criminal onto the streets because he told you a sob story, then I would say that to you because, as a policemen, you would have the obligation of upholding the law.

Modifié par MisterJB, 05 février 2014 - 01:28 .


#394
Lulupab

Lulupab
  • Members
  • 5 455 messages

Dean_the_Young wrote...

blasted long quoting


This pyramid quoting is giving me a major headache.

I was talking with Hierophant and that other guy at once so not all of them were aimed at Hierophant. He basically said Anders is murderer blah blah and I said its a pixelated character and he is being too serious about it, I've seen people less angry towards actual terrorism acts in real life. You are being too serious too Dean. 

Also about the Gaider quote the way I understood technically DG is saying all reactions to what Anders did was expected and intended, the hate, the adoration, the I don't care etc... so when he said the hatred was intended I said yes it was but along with rest of reactions. So the hatred reaction does not get any especial treatment in contrary to what he believes.

Modifié par Rassler, 05 février 2014 - 01:33 .


#395
ImperatorMortis

ImperatorMortis
  • Members
  • 2 571 messages

MisterJB wrote...

ImperatorMortis wrote...

MisterJB wrote...


Therefore, Justinia, Leliana and Evangeline are very much traitors not just to their country but to their people all over Thedas. 


Lol "traitors"

>Implying that they're obligated to them in anyway

I would laugh in the face of anyone who said anything like that to me. Kind of reminds of some dudes I knew who considered others dudes or girls who dated/reproduced outside their race as "traitors". 

We're not talking about random people on the street, we're talking about a Templar, the Divine and her left hand, people who have high ranking positions within institutions so, yes. They very much have an obligation to the citizens of Orlais and if you were a cop that released a criminal onto the streets because he told you a sob story, then I would say that to you because, as a policemen, you would have the obligation of upholding the law.


So people in authority should always forget their own feelings, and just follow what their superiors say is in the best interest for everyone? Might as well just got the extra mile, and only have Golems, and Tranquil as law enforcement or whatever. 

#396
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

ImperatorMortis wrote...
So people in authority should always forget their own feelings, and just follow what their superiors say is in the best interest for everyone? Might as well just got the extra mile, and only have Golems, and Tranquil as law enforcement or whatever. 

Yes, people in positions of authority should fulfill their duty in spite of their personal feelings. What they do in their personal time is their own business but so long as they are wearing the uniform, then they are obligated to behave in a certain manner in order to pursue the interests of the community rather than their own.

Modifié par MisterJB, 05 février 2014 - 02:12 .


#397
CrabbyCrackers

CrabbyCrackers
  • Members
  • 343 messages
maybe a little but i think justice talking in his ear so to speak made him that way, " the voices made me do it" in this case voice.

#398
mrs_anomaly

mrs_anomaly
  • Members
  • 3 007 messages
Yes, Anders is manipulative. But I enjoyed being manipulated by my sweetest revolutionary. Didn't like his final acts at all, but my Hawke was dedicated to him. They're both flawed, fatally, what can I say.

#399
OrayMoor

OrayMoor
  • Members
  • 173 messages
He definitely was manipulative, he used my Hawkes love for him to advance his goals! My hawke was a pro peace mage and he turnd out to be a terorist, but at the end hawke couldent kill him because she loved him.
I love it when bioware lets me create all of those interesting stories in their games.

#400
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 683 messages

The Flying Grey Warden wrote...

Dean_the_Young wrote...

The Flying Grey Warden wrote...

So why would a cure that only the templars know about and are allowed to enact, that was well regulated and would have the same stringent and heavily safeguard method of criteria that judging someone to be tranquiled would be employed, would lead to mass murder and the destruction of all things the circle holds dear.


I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Awkward syntax. I assume you were responding to me?

The Templars wouldn't be the only ones to know about it because the cured-Tranquil would also know, even if the Templars finished the cure in secret without the mages or divine knowing. Unless you intend to lock the cured Tranquil in solitary away from everyone else for all time, the news will get to the mages. Which, of course, would invite their own attempts to recreate: knowing something is possible is half the difficulty in creation, as a professor once told me.

The rest is a matter of simple crime. The Templars can be the only ones allowed to enact it, but it's irrelevant if the knowledge escapes their control. Just one mage with mind-control, chantry sympathizer, mundane theif, or Templar defector or corruption needs to be successful to leak the secret, and the maleficar networks can do the rest to preserve and spread the knowledge around. Given the potency of what's at stake, and the possible rewards, I wouldn't bet too much on it being a long-lived secret once people realize the Templars have it.

Once the knoweldge spreads, the Templar monopology can't be relied upon to prevent tranquil from being cured. That undermines the premise of letting people go Tranquil in the first place, and that in turn challenges the Harrowing. Changing the Harrowing by removing the third option is a scenario no one wants: either executions go up to compensate for the lack of Tranquility, or the quality of 'reliable' mages goes down as the prior tranquility candidates enter the mage pool.

Unintended consequence? Certainly. But second and third-order effects usually are.




You have a lot of ifs and ands that when applyed to dragon age sort of fall apart. Such as the harrowing, an act that every mage goes through, but doesn't tell anyone about, and nobody is decrying about how the harrowing will become public knowledge and lead to the apocolypse of the chantry system and all of thedas, which you seem to do. Nobody locks up the harrowed mages in isolated cells away from other mages and yet nobody blabs to the non-harrowed mages about what goes on either, so I think we'll be good on the secrecy department.

Er, what?

Mages know about the Harrowing. They also know about the alternatives: tranquility and death. The issue isn't the Harrowing becoming public knowledge: outside of the Circles, which already know, it won't matter. The issue is the impact on the Harrowing itself.

And the tranquiled aren't that common outside of the circle, not in the numbers that having a tranquility cure might cause a apocalypse. It would require maleficarum not only to know the secret, but have the neccisary tools needed to preform the ritual, and get their hands on just the right tranquiled that they can somehow use it to their advantage in some way that you don't even specify. What would happen if all the tranquiled who operated outside the circle were voluntary tranquiled? Have all the blood mage ones stay in the circle and preform the duties that the tranquilled do. Now you could argue that the maleficarum might infiltrate the circle, but if they have infiltrated the circle, what is going to be so much worse about them knowing how to reverse tranquility, in fact why would they do that when they can just assassinate the knight commander, or open a fade tear in the circle? Maleficarum infiltration is already dangerous regardless of knowing how to reverse tranquility or not, so that is completely irrelevant to the discussion.

Again, you're overstating my case in ways I wasn't. And you aren't even discerning the threat.

Apostates finding out about the secret and gathering the resources isn't unlikely. It might take some time, but the secret will emerge as soon as an anti-circle mage learns about the Cure (which will be obvious once the first Tranquil is reversed inside a circle that knows the restored mage was once tranquil). It is relatively trivial for the secret of the cure to get out, and the only way the Templars could prevent any from knowing about the Cure would be if they never used it and controlled the information about it's existence. Which they can't, because the mages and Chantry already were involved in creating it.

Gathering components is also hardly an insurmountable difficulty either. The player can help apostate rings in DAO who post requests on the chantry board, and smuggling controlled items (like lyrium and entire people) in and out of the Circles is known. Information and material leakage is to be expected.

Tranquil outside the Circles who are cured are an issue for the same reasons mages outside the Circle are an issue. The cure doesn't even have to be deliberate or voluntary on their part to raise the issue, since mage intent to be a threat has never been the reason why mages are so dangerous.

Maleficarum infiltration was never a crux of my argument, but the relative feasibility of smuggling information as oppossed to catastrophic damage would warrant it being a concern anyways.

Which really leaves only one possible threat, the tranquiled themselves. But not even that could be a threat as the tranquiled don't care about feeling again, or at least don't seem to want to. I doubt the tranquiled would go around, curing themselves left and right, even without being asked not to, because they would reason that they are already comfortable as they are and thus do not need alteration or reversion in order to feel good or complete. And even if a former tranquiled wanted to do that, he would still lack the neccisary resources needed, which would be under templar control IE lots of lyrium, to actually complete any such ritual. And if he turned to blood magic to try it you may ask? Well then treat him like any other blood mage, it's back to being tranquil with you. Sorry, you violated your parole.

Besides the disagreement with the starting premise, this rather stumbles into a misunderstanding of what Tranquility is used for. Tranquility is inflicted when people are deemed untrustworthy and intolerable by the Templars. These are already mages who would not be tolerated inside or out of the circles, and otherwise put to death... so what, pray tell, is the Templar reason for offering 'parole' to tranquility, aside from the some rare case of a post-conviction acquital? 

And it'll change the harrowing? Seriously? You don't give evidence for why that would happen. You just blurt it out and expect us to accep it at face value.

Er... we're dealing with expected results of the future. Verbal and written analysis of choice structure is a huge part of that.

The Harrowing is a test everyone goes to, and thus, all people who have undergone it are aware of.

It has three possible outcomes: pass, fail and death, or tranquility. Templars tolerate tranquility because a tranquil will not be a target for demonic possession.

When tranquility is no longer reliable, such as the existance of a total cure that the Templars can not monopolize (as time progresses, all non-zero possibilities approach certainty) will remove the third dynamic. As tranquility becomes less and less reliable, the previous dynamic of life, death, and something between the two will become just life or death. Whether the Templars carry out the death or not, the balance is broken as either they do not execute those who would be made tranquil but now can not be expected to remain so, which leaves untrustworthy mages in the pool, or they do execute more mages and so garner more animosity.

That's game theory. That's what happens when you change systems like this.