Thibax wrote...
Some girls do not play a game because it hasn't a female representative in marketing? Really?
And books, movies and TV series? They also will not read or watch because it hasn't a female character who represent the content?
Is a kind of childish thinking?
Everything in the whole world now need to show both male and female characters?
Then if they show both white male and female, will you call the game racist? Again, they need to show both couples?
But if the both characters are blond. Oh God, what about the brunettes?
Let's make a cover for DAI with all possible characters. Nobody will cry.
Not any more childish than the catering of the video game industry to the straight male gamer.
For the last decade, gaming was usually dominated with advertising towards men, since clearly some people didn't think women played games. Why must gaming be dominated by hordes of white male protagonists with a stubble. I think the last 100000 of them was enough.
Why is it that developer's represent this one type every single time? Why not have a little variety?
It's because of stereotypes, my listeners, stereotypes. The stereotype of the geeky gamer guy will never go away anytime soon.
This isn't about appeasing everyone, this is about having some variety in advertising. This is about reminding women gamers that they are remembered as being actual gamers, that they are considered just as much as the straight male gamer. If you can't see that, then I pity you, I really do.
Is it really too much to ask for a little variety? Is it enough to be insulted and lash out when someone asks for it? Must we as a society always hate things that are different from the status quo? Is it really necessary?