Eezo, eezo everywhere...
#1
Posté 08 février 2014 - 05:29
So how is it that every single enemy you run into has mass-accelerator based weaponry (eezo) and kinetic barriers (more eezo) if the stuff is so rare? Every single ship, every shuttle, every air car, and presumably every floor plate which produces artificial gravity makes use of the stuff. It's even in Traynor's toothbrush. Wouldn't conventional gunpowder-based weaponry still be useful, especially since the principle advantage of eezo weaponry went out the window with the introduction of thermal clips? Wouldn't we see a lot more enemies (especially low-end mercs) limited to ballistic armor with no kinetic barriers? Cerberus in ME3 did this with their run-of-the-mill ivory mooks, which seemed more realistic, I'm just wondering if we'll see more conventional weaponry or armor where kinetic barriers are expensive but optional in future titles.
I imagine post-Destroy tere would be no shortage of eezo for the galaxy to make use of, of course...
#2
Posté 08 février 2014 - 06:49
#3
Posté 08 février 2014 - 06:51
What the field does accordign to fiction is that ir reduses the mass of the matter beign accelerated.
In essense the force applied to a much smaller mass creates greater acceleration.
Once the projectile leaves the field the mass of the projectile returns to normal but the speed remains the same.
Meaning you created kinetic energy by applying a mass effect field durign the energytransferprocess.
One coudl even say that it created energy. It's unknown how much energy is consumed to supply the mass effect field. It coudl be that it cancels each other out but that it's merely easier power a projectile this way. Also, it would theoreticaly allow a much smaller kickback for the gun making a more powerful gun easier to handle.
Just making the kickback one third that of what it would be otherwise would be a huge gain.
Modifié par shodiswe, 08 février 2014 - 06:56 .
#4
Posté 08 février 2014 - 06:56
#5
Posté 08 février 2014 - 07:06
Maybe it's another thing the writers forgot.
#6
Posté 08 février 2014 - 07:10
#7
Posté 08 février 2014 - 07:11
It isn't consumed in the same manner crude oil is consumed.
It's more like Platina or something that can be used as a catalyst to get reactions going without consuming the catalyst.
Modifié par shodiswe, 08 février 2014 - 07:13 .
#8
Posté 08 février 2014 - 07:14
Modifié par R0gueHunt3R, 08 février 2014 - 07:18 .
#9
Posté 08 février 2014 - 07:16
#10
Posté 08 février 2014 - 07:16
#11
Posté 08 février 2014 - 07:21
So e-zero is both naturally occurring and synthesizable. It's rare enough that it's cost-effective to mine for it, but prevalent enough that it's not a monoplizable resource.
#12
Posté 08 février 2014 - 07:31
only-logical.blogspot.co.uk/2011/02/physics-of-mass-effect.html
As mentioned by shodiswe, Eezo is a catalyst, not a fuel source, the only thing consumed when generating a mass effect field is electricity, which can be generated in whatever manner you see fit.
As the above link mentioned, a mass effect field generator is directly comparable to an electromagnet.
That's significant since we already know that electromagnets can be somewhat costly to make, but once made only require an electrical current to function, making them more than worth the initial cost to manufacture, given their utility.
One can easily imagine eezo devices being similar in nature in terms of manufacturing economics.
Modifié par Evil Mastered, 08 février 2014 - 07:37 .
#13
Posté 08 février 2014 - 08:05
shodiswe wrote...
very little Eezo is required, I'm guessing.
That would be my guess as well. Perhaps things like Traynor's toothbrush or personal firearms only require a few grains of the stuff. Drive cores of course would require much more.
#14
Posté 08 février 2014 - 08:13
It seems common to us because of how sought after it is. Because of that, corporations go out of their way to find it and then mine it.
But consider it this way: gold is considered rare to our contemporary culture. But how rare is it? How can it be considered rare when we see so much of it?
It's because of the ratio of gold to other elements. For example, nitrogen or hydrogen.
So, say you have a cluster and within that cluster are 200 known planets. If only 15 of those planets contain Element Zero, that is still pretty rare when you consider the sheer amount of other elements you are likely to find on the remaining 185. What are the quantities of Hydrogen, Xenon, Argon, Nickel, Iron, Tungsten, etc, that you are going to be able to mine on those other worlds?
Element Zero, available on a sparce 15 of them, is priceless by comparsion. And worlds like Thessia where it is available in large quantities would be even more rare.
#15
Posté 08 février 2014 - 08:21
Evil Mastered wrote...
As mentioned by shodiswe, Eezo is a catalyst, not a fuel source, the only thing consumed when generating a mass effect field is electricity, which can be generated in whatever manner you see fit.
I was not saying that it was a fuel source, I was wondering whether or not it had an infinite useful lifespan.
Let me clarify: a battery is not "consumed" with use, but it only has a limited number of recharge cycles before it becomes little more than a paperweight. The same thing might happen with Eezo; it can only be used so many times before the Eezo core must be replaced.
Modifié par R0gueHunt3R, 08 février 2014 - 08:25 .
#16
Posté 08 février 2014 - 08:30
R0gueHunt3R wrote...
Evil Mastered wrote...
As mentioned by shodiswe, Eezo is a catalyst, not a fuel source, the only thing consumed when generating a mass effect field is electricity, which can be generated in whatever manner you see fit.
I was not saying that it was a fuel source, I was wondering whether or not it had an infinite useful lifespan.
Let me clarify: a battery is not "consumed" with use, but it only has a limited number of recharge cycles before it becomes little more than a paperweight. The same thing might happen with Eezo; it can only be used so many times before the Eezo core must be replaced.
Even if eezo cores on starships 'burn out' however, it doesn't necessarily mean that the eezo in personal weapons or armor would. Space travel might put a lot more stress on the eezo than the operating mechanisms of a rifle. Its possible at least that technology a lot less complicated than star ship drive cores could last much longer.
#17
Posté 08 février 2014 - 09:03
#18
Posté 08 février 2014 - 09:38
#19
Posté 08 février 2014 - 11:34
And we make toothbrushes out of plastic made from fossil fuels, just to complete the similarity.





Retour en haut







