Do you still hate Mass effect 3?
#1376
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:19
- MassivelyEffective0730 aime ceci
#1377
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:20
and this is where you let your feeble organic emotions cloud your judgement (insert obnoxious evil laugh). Because its perspective of the situation is different than your own, doesn't negate the fact that the events it speaks of actually happened or that it's being honestThe Leviathans lose all credibility when they say "There was no mistake, it still serves its purpose"
That's such a serious disconnect from reality I might as well believe the Citadel was built by superadvanced pyjaks.
#1378
Guest_xray16_*
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:22
Guest_xray16_*
I wasn't okay with it (as shipped). I (as well as others) don't care if you don't like the game. There was a time when I hated it. Everybody has an opinion, and when posting on this forum we usually assume you're simply posting your opinion. It's when people pass off their opinion as fact with "it was bad because a. b. c. incorrect narrative structure/villain introduction" jargon crapola.
I'm not sure what you posted earlier, so don't take what I said previously in the thread as something directed towards you.
Me liking the game doesn't make me come here and ignore its flaws. Someone not liking it shouldn't possess them to come here and try their best to make everything seem nonsensical, when actually a good deal of it fits in a fairly straightforward fashion. You don't like it. Cool. I thought TLoU sucked balls, but it's universally praised for doing nothing new. Opinions. You get it. I get it. We're good.
We' are most definitiely good.
Ever since ME3 was released, before the EC was shipped - I have always respected the opinions of everyone who has played and experienced the Mass Effect universe - whatever those opinions may be.
I don't like where they;ve taken it with ME3. that's my opinion and I have a right to that - however anyone else may disagree has the same right tio their view and I 100% respect that.
So as I said - we're definitely good. It would be crazy to harbour ANY ill will to anyone else for their views about an entertainment software program- especially with the challenges and state of the world today.
#1379
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:23
I'm still a fan of introducing glowbrat to the Irene Demova virus.
"Now listen to me carefully. I am...lying" ![]()
#1380
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:25
I'm still a fan of introducing glowbrat to the Irene Demova virus.
"I need to stop the Reapers. Do you know how I can do that?"
"Not now, watching porn."
- I Tsunayoshi I et DeinonSlayer aiment ceci
#1381
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:26
you're implying that something that wasn't constructed as a Mass Relay, can be converted (turned into) one?
By the people who held the technology to do both? Yes. I am implying that the Catalyst could convert the Citadel into the hub of the mass relays. Are you implying that it can't, or that the Leviathans couldn't?
#1382
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:26
I can just picture him now:"I need to stop the Reapers. Do you know how I can do that?"
"Not now, watching porn."

Hey, you figure it's gotta be somewhere in Joker's stash.
#1383
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:29
The Leviathans lose all credibility when they say "There was no mistake, it still serves its purpose"
That's such a serious disconnect from reality I might as well believe the Citadel was built by superadvanced pyjaks.
How do they lose credibility? They are 100% correct. It's serving it's purpose to the letter.
The Leviathans have a highly dismantled credibility yes, but not for the reasons you're ascribing to them.
#1384
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:30
How do they lose credibility? They are 100% correct. It's serving it's purpose to the letter.
The Leviathans have a highly dismantled credibility yes, but not for the reasons you're ascribing to them.
The Reapers nearly annihilated their race, presumably thier thralls as well, drove them into hiding for untold millions of years, and no mistake was made?
#1385
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:31
The Reapers nearly annihilated their race, and no mistake was made?
Is "reasons" not reason enough for you?
#1386
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:33
The Reapers nearly annihilated their race, presumably thier thralls as well, drove them into hiding for untold millions of years, and no mistake was made?
By the Catalyst following it's mandate? No.
No mistake was made. The Catalyst made no error in following it's mandate.
It continues to serve the mandate set forth by the Leviathans.
Permanently end conflict between organics and synthetics.
The logic is flawed when you get down to what the mandate is. It's a typical logic bomb. Like HAL 9000 from 2001.
#1387
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:37
"Now listen to me carefully. I am...lying"

"Umm... Yes? I'm gonna go with 'yes.'"
#1388
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:37
By the Catalyst following it's mandate? No.
No mistake was made. The Catalyst made no error in following it's mandate.
It continues to serve the mandate set forth by the Leviathans.
Permanently end conflict between organics and synthetics.
Leviathan: The intellilgence was envisioned as simply another tool
Shepard: And now we all pay the price for your mistake
Leviathan: There was no mistake, it still serves its purpose
The Leviathans frakked up royally, and their descendents are still so bloated on their overweaning pride they still can't accept that. They're freaking delusional.
#1389
Guest_xray16_*
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:43
Guest_xray16_*
By the Catalyst following it's mandate? No.
No mistake was made. The Catalyst made no error in following it's mandate.
It continues to serve the mandate set forth by the Leviathans.
Permanently end conflict between organics and synthetics.
The logic is flawed when you get down to what the mandate is. It's a typical logic bomb. Like HAL 9000 from 2001.
Assuming it was truthful in what it told you. And even if it was - it's a Machine. It coud easily have been programmed to tell you that, It appears in the last 5 minutes and grants all this info out of nowhere. Yeah Right- I'm gonna take that at face value without oversight - especially with the fate of the GALAXY riding on it. No pressure.
Meanwhile a squadron of elephapnts are flying overhead practicing their barrel rolls...and the NSA are definitely not reading all my emails.
Oh wait....
#1390
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:45
Leviathan: The intellilgence was envisioned as simply another tool
Shepard: And now we all pay the price for your mistake
Leviathan: There was no mistake, it still serves its purpose
The Leviathans frakked up royally, and their descendents are still so bloated on their overweaning pride they still can't accept that. They're freaking delusional.
There was no mistake. You're missing the point. The detail is in the fine print on the Leviathans end. They're likely aware of where they screwed up. But they didn't screw up in the way you think they did.
In the fine print of the stipulation the Leviathans made in the Catalyst's programming and mandate: Prevent conflict between organics and synthetics.
It's doing just that.
It's been doing just that for an untold amount of time.
The problem comes from what's in the wording of the stipulation. The Leviathans never said 'don't kill organics or synthetics'. It told them to solve the problem of conflict between the two. It was a very poorly worded mandate, and the Catalyst I suspect even realizes this. But it's there. The Leviathans never told the Catalyst how to solve the conflict, only that it had to solve it. And the Catalyst resorted to Reaping to prevent the conflict from ever taking place. Over time, it developed the concept of synthesis, the singularity, where organic and synthetic become one.
Is it ****** poor writing by BW? Yes. But it's still there. You're 100% wrong to say the Catalyst failed at its mandate. It serves the purpose assigned to it, and, as I've stated, it's been following it to the letter for eons.
- SwobyJ aime ceci
#1391
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:48
Assuming it was truthful in what it told you. And even if it was - it's a Machine. It coud easily have been programmed to tell you that, It appears in the last 5 minutes and grants all this info out of nowhere. Yeah Right- I'm gonna take that at face value without oversight - especially with the fate of the GALAXY riding on it. No pressure.
Meanwhile a squadron of elephapnts are flying overhead practicing their barrel rolls...and the NSA are definitely not reading all my emails.
Oh wait....
It was 100% truthful with what it told you. The matter is that what it told you was irrelevant. You aren't there to solve its problem. You're there to solve your problem. It's not lying to you at all. It's telling you what is, and it's telling you what it personally perceives as ideal to solving its problem. I
#1392
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:53
The Reapers nearly annihilated their race, presumably thier thralls as well, drove them into hiding for untold millions of years, and no mistake was made?
Do many quarians believe they made a mistake by making the geth, or do they think they can still use them as tools/servants?
Leviathans = Admiral Xen + Many years to ruminate
#1393
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:56
It was 100% truthful with what it told you. The matter is that what it told you was irrelevant. You aren't there to solve its problem. You're there to solve your problem. It's not lying to you at all. It's telling you what is, and it's telling you what it personally perceives as ideal to solving its problem. I
Mac Walters: "You don't need to know ____ (etc etc)"
The Leviathan and Catalyst story is there. It's more sound than it appears. And we can reject it outright if we wish, and have very good reason to. Shepard is never gonna go "Great I totally agree with you and everything you've done". The Leviathans and Catalyst are not supposed to be our friends. But we're allowed to go "Alright, I can see what you were trying with ___, so let me try ____", like he does with every other species and character he has conflict with in the trilogy.
So yeah I agree.
#1394
Guest_xray16_*
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 01:57
Guest_xray16_*
It was 100% truthful with what it told you. The matter is that what it told you was irrelevant. You aren't there to solve its problem. You're there to solve your problem. It's not lying to you at all. It's telling you what is, and it's telling you what it personally perceives as ideal to solving its problem. I
>It was 100% truthful with what it told you.
Really? Says who? I am lord lucan. Do you believe me?
In the context of the game universe - If I were in the position of Shepherd - I wouldn't take an iota of what some random projection mimicing a figure I'd already seen had to say at face value.
It's cobblers.
#1395
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 02:00
>It was 100% truthful with what it told you.
Really? Says who? I am lord lucan. Do you believe me?
In the context of the game universe - If I were in the position of Shepherd - I wouldn't take an iota of what some random projection mimicing a figure I'd already seen had to say at face value.
It's cobblers.
Well yeah its a virtual world inside a Reaper and you've only served the purpose of optimizing its systems.....
I've said too much.
#1396
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 02:01
>It was 100% truthful with what it told you.
Really? Says who? I am lord lucan. Do you believe me?
In the context of the game universe - If I were in the position of Shepherd - I wouldn't take an iota of what some random projection mimicing a figure I'd already seen had to say at face value.
It's cobblers.
Why is it cobblers?
I can present an argument about why the entire part of the game is poorly written and bad on a meta-level and internal level, and I can present an argument (speculative) on why the Catalyst is furthering an agenda based on a flawed stipulated premise.
But I will defend it from people who irrationally attack it because they're angry and irrational. You have no reason not to take what it's saying at face value. As I said, it's just irrelevant. Does the Catalyst's problem really matter to you? It's correct in its assessment and solution of its premises function. It's not correct (And I suspect it knows it's not correct) with the overall nature of the entire philosophy of the problem itself.
- SwobyJ aime ceci
#1397
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 02:14
There was no mistake. You're missing the point. The detail is in the fine print on the Leviathans end. They're likely aware of where they screwed up. But they didn't screw up in the way you think they did.
In the fine print of the stipulation the Leviathans made in the Catalyst's programming and mandate: Prevent conflict between organics and synthetics.
It's doing just that.
It's been doing just that for an untold amount of time.
The problem comes from what's in the wording of the stipulation. The Leviathans never said 'don't kill organics or synthetics'. It told them to solve the problem of conflict between the two. It was a very poorly worded mandate, and the Catalyst I suspect even realizes this. But it's there. The Leviathans never told the Catalyst how to solve the conflict, only that it had to solve it. And the Catalyst resorted to Reaping to prevent the conflict from ever taking place. Over time, it developed the concept of synthesis, the singularity, where organic and synthetic become one.
Is it ****** poor writing by BW? Yes. But it's still there. You're 100% wrong to say the Catalyst failed at its mandate. It serves the purpose assigned to it, and, as I've stated, it's been following it to the letter for eons.
The Leviathan's are pretty awful at programming.
#1398
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 02:15
#1399
Guest_xray16_*
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 02:16
Guest_xray16_*
Im not actuallly attacking the game here. From the point of view of someine IN that universe, would you believe what you were being told - with no former or previous information, clues, hints etc. I'd be a tad sceptical faced with a load of info that was completely from leftfield and didn't fit with anything I already knew? It might be a Wag-The-Dog-Scenario?
I get the feeling you're talking about what "BioWare said" they intended. I'm talking about "what Shephard might've thought" about the info being presented out of the blue.With everything they'd been through.
But hey that's a personal thing- so if you don't agree then tha's cool with me.
#1400
Posté 10 mai 2014 - 02:18
Its as though Shepard's mind is being guided.





Retour en haut




