Sorry, that's just horribly wrong.EntropicAngel wrote...
You know what we need? We need a chemical reaction to fix carbon (from CO2 of course) in the atmosphere. Nothing else is going to "stop" climate change. It's all a cycle, and the only problem we're having is that we don't have a way to convert it back to a liquid or solid (just as long as it's not in the atmosphere).bobobo878 wrote...
The fossil fuel industry actually played an enormous role in promoting these technologies as a means to distract environmentalists from the fact that nuclear power was the only power source that ever had the potential to stop climate change. Might be too late for it to help now though.
Silly and useless inventions that still made it.
#101
Posté 20 février 2014 - 03:42
#102
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Posté 20 février 2014 - 03:44
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
How so?Volus Warlord wrote...
Sorry, that's just horribly wrong.EntropicAngel wrote...
You know what we need? We need a chemical reaction to fix carbon (from CO2 of course) in the atmosphere. Nothing else is going to "stop" climate change. It's all a cycle, and the only problem we're having is that we don't have a way to convert it back to a liquid or solid (just as long as it's not in the atmosphere).
Modifié par EntropicAngel, 20 février 2014 - 03:53 .
#103
Posté 20 février 2014 - 04:56
#104
Posté 20 février 2014 - 06:20
EntropicAngel wrote...
How so?Volus Warlord wrote...
Sorry, that's just horribly wrong.EntropicAngel wrote...
You know what we need? We need a chemical reaction to fix carbon (from CO2 of course) in the atmosphere. Nothing else is going to "stop" climate change. It's all a cycle, and the only problem we're having is that we don't have a way to convert it back to a liquid or solid (just as long as it's not in the atmosphere).
We can remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Plants do it all the time. Photosynthesis
We can also remove CO2 from plant emissions. We have been able to for a long time. A scrubber can do so, but they drive up costs and drive down efficiency. Those things are not cheap to build, run, or maintain.
The issue is that we are greatly outpacing the rate at which CO2 can be absorbed. The ocean does, to some extent, provide a buffer against CO2 which would SUPPOSEDLY acidify the ocean over time, but that's a whole other matter.
Modifié par Volus Warlord, 20 février 2014 - 06:21 .
#105
Posté 20 février 2014 - 06:42
#106
Posté 20 février 2014 - 06:44
You shut your ignorant mouth, Teflon is one of the best inventions ever.mybudgee wrote...
Teflon
#107
Posté 20 février 2014 - 09:07
#108
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Posté 21 février 2014 - 08:35
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
I understand that plants do it. However, the problem is as you described, that plants are "slower" than we're putting it out there. It there was an actual technological way to do it, not needing chloroplasts and all that biology, there would be real potential.Volus Warlord wrote...
We can remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Plants do it all the time. Photosynthesis
We can also remove CO2 from plant emissions. We have been able to for a long time. A scrubber can do so, but they drive up costs and drive down efficiency. Those things are not cheap to build, run, or maintain.
The issue is that we are greatly outpacing the rate at which CO2 can be absorbed. The ocean does, to some extent, provide a buffer against CO2 which would SUPPOSEDLY acidify the ocean over time, but that's a whole other matter.
#109
Posté 21 février 2014 - 10:38
#110
Posté 21 février 2014 - 03:03
I literally just said that there's a technological way to do it.EntropicAngel wrote...
I understand that plants do it. However, the problem is as you described, that plants are "slower" than we're putting it out there. It there was an actual technological way to do it, not needing chloroplasts and all that biology, there would be real potential.Volus Warlord wrote...
We can remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Plants do it all the time. Photosynthesis
We can also remove CO2 from plant emissions. We have been able to for a long time. A scrubber can do so, but they drive up costs and drive down efficiency. Those things are not cheap to build, run, or maintain.
The issue is that we are greatly outpacing the rate at which CO2 can be absorbed. The ocean does, to some extent, provide a buffer against CO2 which would SUPPOSEDLY acidify the ocean over time, but that's a whole other matter.
#111
Posté 21 février 2014 - 07:52
These structures will shade and cool large parts of the desert surface. Which means more comfortable habitats. For people, animals, maybe agriculture. Maybe it will rain more. If it doesn't, add some solar towers at intervals.
Modifié par bEVEsthda, 21 février 2014 - 08:51 .
#112
Posté 21 février 2014 - 07:55
We burn fossil fuel, consuming oxygen. Scrubbing removes the resultant CO2, but does not free the oxygen. Unlike photosynthesis.
#113
Posté 21 février 2014 - 08:23
A lot of you have probably never used anything different? Which is why you assume it's simple and convenient?
It's neither.
Take a stick of shaving soap instead, Palmolive or Tabac. You just wet your face, and use the stick like a crayon on your face. A couple of invisible marks is enough. We're maybe ten seconds in. Apply a wet shaving brush to the face and another ten seconds later you're covered in creamy lather.
Apply your phenomenal Gillette safety razor and you'll be finished in almost the same time as it takes to distribute that canned foam evenly and clean your hand afterwards.
But the real trick, the real beauty, is when you rinse the razor under the tap. It becomes clean. I mean really clean. No little hairs clogging at the corners or between the blades. I really mean it. The razor is rinsed perfectly clear every time. The stuff that makes your razors clog, is really the canned foam itself. It's too slimy and sticky, and dissolves too poorly in water.
The final surprise is the lifespan of your razor blades. I'm not saying anything, you have to experience it yourself.
So why are people using canned foam?
Beats me. Don't say it's convenient because it's not.
What about shaving gel? Expensive. But the brand I've tried was actually good. As good as shaving soap, but maybe a little, little bit more fuzz to spread out and rinse away. But certainly a lot better than canned foam.
Modifié par bEVEsthda, 21 février 2014 - 08:37 .
#114
Posté 21 février 2014 - 08:46
End of Line.
Unless some kinda 'Ice Age' happens (=> change in atmosphere and the direction clouds will go) no significant change in Arizona, Gobi or Great Sahara of Africa will happen.
#115
Posté 21 février 2014 - 08:53
Kaiser Arian wrote...
@bEVEsthda, about deserts... That's not how it works. You'll finally find water shortage. The temperature isn't the real problem, the lack of water is. http://en.wikipedia...._Desert#Climate
End of Line.
Unless some kinda 'Ice Age' happens (=> change in atmosphere and the direction clouds will go) no significant change in Arizona, Gobi or Great Sahara of Africa will happen.
I'm going to draw the water all the way from the sea. I said sea water.
#116
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Posté 21 février 2014 - 09:04
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Ah, I missed the scubber thing.Volus Warlord wrote...
I literally just said that there's a technological way to do it.
Interesting. That seems like the answer, then. Though I don't know how it works, so it might not be the "best" way to go about it.
Yeah, probably right.metatheurgist wrote...
^ I don't think there's a better way to do it than choloroplasts and biology. What needs to happen is we need to leverage genetics and commercial farming to help biology catch up to the industrial scale of the problem. Some research is already going on to adapt algae to the task, but if there's no $$$ at the end it's unlikely to succeed.
Ah, well. It's not like humans are the end-all, be-all.
#117
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
Posté 21 février 2014 - 09:07
Guest_EntropicAngel_*
I've never used shaving cream, and my razors get the hair stuck in them.bEVEsthda wrote...
For useless inventions, I'd like to nominate canned shaving foam.
A lot of you have probably never used anything different? Which is why you assume it's simple and convenient?
It's neither.
Take a stick of shaving soap instead, Palmolive or Tabac. You just wet your face, and use the stick like a crayon on your face. A couple of invisible marks is enough. We're maybe ten seconds in. Apply a wet shaving brush to the face and another ten seconds later you're covered in creamy lather.
Apply your phenomenal Gillette safety razor and you'll be finished in almost the same time as it takes to distribute that canned foam evenly and clean your hand afterwards.
But the real trick, the real beauty, is when you rinse the razor under the tap. It becomes clean. I mean really clean. No little hairs clogging at the corners or between the blades. I really mean it. The razor is rinsed perfectly clear every time. The stuff that makes your razors clog, is really the canned foam itself. It's too slimy and sticky, and dissolves too poorly in water.
The final surprise is the lifespan of your razor blades. I'm not saying anything, you have to experience it yourself.
So why are people using canned foam?
Beats me. Don't say it's convenient because it's not.
What about shaving gel? Expensive. But the brand I've tried was actually good. As good as shaving soap, but maybe a little, little bit more fuzz to spread out and rinse away. But certainly a lot better than canned foam.
And in response to your comment about electrical razors, earlier, I would say they do an acceptable job if you don't mind a little shadow.
#118
Guest_simfamUP_*
Posté 21 février 2014 - 10:26
Guest_simfamUP_*
The condom.
That's another good one.
What's the point if all you're gonna do is run away to another country anyway?
#119
Posté 21 février 2014 - 10:36
simfamSP wrote...
Oh.
The condom.
That's another good one.
What's the point if all you're gonna do is run away to another country anyway?
I don't get this one. Condoms are very useful. For a lot of different things.
#120
Posté 21 février 2014 - 10:40
bEVEsthda wrote...
simfamSP wrote...
Oh.
The condom.
That's another good one.
What's the point if all you're gonna do is run away to another country anyway?
I don't get this one. Condoms are very useful. For a lot of different things.
It's silly and useless for all those people who like people paying child support and alimony to people you never wanted to see again.
So lawyers and ex's.
Modifié par Darth Brotarian, 21 février 2014 - 10:41 .
#121
Guest_simfamUP_*
Posté 21 février 2014 - 11:50
Guest_simfamUP_*
bEVEsthda wrote...
simfamSP wrote...
Oh.
The condom.
That's another good one.
What's the point if all you're gonna do is run away to another country anyway?
I don't get this one. Condoms are very useful. For a lot of different things.
bEVEsthda, if there is one thing anyone should know about me is that 80% of the time you shouldn't take me seriously.
I've been gay, transgender, a lawyer, a forty year old virgin living in his mother's basement, a cat and a house-wife who murdered her husband.
But in reality...
I am the Ironman.
#122
Posté 22 février 2014 - 06:02
simfamSP wrote...
bEVEsthda, if there is one thing anyone should know about me is that 80% of the time you shouldn't take me seriously.
Lucky you. I want people not to take me seriously 30% of the time, but people actually don't take me seriously 95% of the time. Because I'm not a western culture lover (Asia have the best cultures), because my study is in 'human science', because I'm politically not your favorite, BECAUSE I HATE TO READ WALLS OF TEXTS, and finally cuz I have grammar fail like 10% of the time.
#123
Guest_simfamUP_*
Posté 22 février 2014 - 09:54
Guest_simfamUP_*
Kaiser Arian wrote...
simfamSP wrote...
bEVEsthda, if there is one thing anyone should know about me is that 80% of the time you shouldn't take me seriously.
Lucky you. I want people not to take me seriously 30% of the time, but people actually don't take me seriously 95% of the time. Because I'm not a western culture lover (Asia have the best cultures), because my study is in 'human science', because I'm politically not your favorite, BECAUSE I HATE TO READ WALLS OF TEXTS, and finally cuz I have grammar fail like 10% of the time.
Modifié par simfamSP, 22 février 2014 - 09:55 .
#124
Posté 22 février 2014 - 11:20
#125
Posté 25 février 2014 - 03:42
bEVEsthda, if there is one thing anyone should know about me is that 80% of the time you shouldn't take me seriously.
I've been gay, transgender, a lawyer, a forty year old virgin living in his mother's basement, a cat and a house-wife who murdered her husband.
But in reality...
I am the Ironman.
And I am the EGGMAN!





Retour en haut







