I hope not
I'll just light him up with a fireball and be done with it.
![]()
I hope not
I'll just light him up with a fireball and be done with it.
![]()
I'll just light him up with a fireball and be done with it.
Sounds good to me ![]()
Based on your use of punctuation marks, chaotic. While we don't agree too often, I think your heart is in the right place, so you're chaotic good.
Sorry about the chaos.
Neutral, also known as best alignment.
Edit:
Lawful yeah, and the brutality pushes you from neutral to evil.
And me?
I want to do something nasty to Sebastian just so I can hear some:
*snip*
I laughed waaaay harder than I should have at that oh my god
Needs 1080p.
Uh, Sebastian is the reason why i spare Anders murderknife to kill him later in my Templar PTs.
Uh, Sebastian is the reason why i spare Anders murderknife to kill him later in my Templar PTs.
How come, if you don't mind me asking?
How come, if you don't mind me asking?
How come what - that i spare Anders, that i kill him later in the Gallows, or that i ditch Sebastian?
How come what - that i spare Anders, that i kill him later in the Gallows, or that i ditch Sebastian?
Ah, okay this makes more sense. I was confused by some of the wording in your previous post.
To make sure I've understood this: You let Anders go the first time you can get the murderknife option because you dislike Sebastian. Then you confront and kill Anders later.
Got it, makes sense for a pro-Templar playthrough. I don't hate Sebastian, but I'm not a big fan of the guy either and that is a creative RP way to stick it to him. ![]()
Ah, okay this makes more sense. I was confused by some of the wording in your previous post.
To make sure I've understood this: You let Anders go the first time you can get the murderknife option because you dislike Sebastian. Then you confront and kill Anders later.
Got it, makes sense for a pro-Templar playthrough. I don't hate Sebastian, but I'm not a big fan of the guy either and that is a creative RP way to stick it to him.
Yes, basically i get rid of the 2 persons i don't like with 1 blow, while giving Anders a warrior's death instead of lame backstab. I want to see his eyes.
I laughed waaaay harder than I should have at that oh my god
**adds to Favorites**
Yes, basically i get rid of the 2 persons i don't like with 1 blow, while giving Anders a warrior's death instead of lame backstab. I want to see his eyes.
Ah, very cool. I can certainly respect that.
Well anyway, back to my previous question. I'm surprised none of the fierce mage supporters (especially those who hold anti-compromise position) has commented on it. Is it because they have not thought past - freedom for mages? Freedom, then what - run amok, hide in the woods, flee for your lives into the warm embrace of Tevinter? You have to have a plan, if you want your revolution to succeed.
Disappointing.
Ah, okay this makes more sense. I was confused by some of the wording in your previous post.
To make sure I've understood this: You let Anders go the first time you can get the murderknife option because you dislike Sebastian. Then you confront and kill Anders later.
Got it, makes sense for a pro-Templar playthrough. I don't hate Sebastian, but I'm not a big fan of the guy either and that is a creative RP way to stick it to him.
I do think it's better for Sebastian to go back to StarkHaven, which is also I hope that both him and StarkHaven are in DA:I
Well anyway, back to my previous question. I'm surprised none of the fierce mage supporters (especially those who hold anti-compromise position) has commented on it. Is it because they have not thought past - freedom for mages? Freedom, then what - run amok, hide in the woods, flee for your lives into the warm embrace of Tevinter? You have to have a plan, if you want your revolution to succeed.
Disappointing.
I think it's more an issue of the futility of addressing their visions and goals when these discussions have a tendency of being circular. Way back when, alternatives to the Chantry controlled Circles were discussed all the time, and debated to the point where there were multiple ongoing threads fiercely addressing the facets and details of what could be done.
Honestly, I see nothing in your tone that suggests that this would be any different.
So far this thread had no issues with repeating topics, why stop now? ![]()
So far this thread had no issues with repeating topics, why stop now?
Wasn't it exploring new ground with nug condoms?
Eww, that's gross... Can you even imagine it applied to.. ahem, your body parts?
The Chantry and the Templars do peruse those that don't believe in the Maker.
Not really seeing that.
We've seen templars and priests being perfectly neutral towards the Chasind and dalish.
Eww, that's gross... Can you even imagine it applied to.. ahem, your body parts?
People did it with pork, lamb, and other animal skins in olden times.
Eww, that's gross... Can you even imagine it applied to.. ahem, your body parts?
Sometimes I curse my vivid imagination.
Even Cullen say what they doing is just a waste of time...because they are against...THE NATURE
Not really. You are misinterpreting.
The fight against abuse of magic is like the fight agaisnt crime. It cannot really be "won". New criminals are born each day. New crimes committed.
Does that mean that we should disband the police and stop trying to stop crime?
Of course not.
People did it with pork, lamb, and other animal skins in olden times.
Skin? Nah, it was made of intestines methinks.