CrutchCricket wrote...
Wrong. His mandate is the same mandate as any other Spectre- preserve galactic stability. Preventing a Reaper invasion falls under that mandate, as does stopping the Collectors. Funny though, how neither tasks come to him by way of the Council.AlexMBrennan wrote...
If Shepard had attempted to hide behind his spectre status the Alliance would just have had the council revoke it (his mandate is to deal with the collectors, not blow up Baterians) with the net result that everyone in the galaxy now knows that humans can't be trusted with anything.
And last I checked the Council needs evidence of wrongdoing before revoking Spectre status. If the Alliance were to implicate Shepard, they would also implicate themselves and the damage would be far greater than stripping one Spectre of rank.
The sheer stupidity of not only scapegoating Shepard for it, but Shepard actually going for it still galls me. I think only the endings are more nonsensical.
That's the reason why Spectres are made but they are ultimately responsible to the people who grant them those powers. Which is the main problem with the Spectres, they are ultimately agents of the Council, if the Council doesn't like what they are doing they can revoke those powers.





Retour en haut







