300 réponses à ce sujet

[Androme]

Topic title.

[Grieving Natashina]

From what I've gathered, they are going the "pansexual" route again, leaving the LIs open for both genders. I highly doubt we'll have another companion hit on us first, since that caused an uproar last time. I'm not 100% certain on any of that, mind you. However, from what I've read on Gaider's blog, it seems like the most cost effective solution.

Writers are on a "word budget" and romances are the most costly of them. It takes a lot of money to create the dialog for those romances, as well as animation, voice acting, ect. Gaider talked at Gaymer Con about why they've chosen the more "pansexual" or "herosexual" route. If you have the time, I'd really recommend the romance panel for Gaymer Con. It's up on youtube.

Here's the link if you'd like to check it out. It's insightful and pretty funny in parts.



Just warning you from the start: These threads rarely end well, even if you mean well OP.

[Fast Jimmy]

They aren't all bi-sexual.

They are player-sexual.

[thats1evildude]

What do you mean "again"? Sebastian was ladies-only.

[Hellion Rex]

Starsyn wrote...
Just warning you from the start: These threads rarely end well, even if you mean well OP.

He's just declared open war.

[Fast Jimmy]

thats1evildude wrote...

What do you mean "again"? Sebastian was ladies-only.

Technically, depending on how you classify a romance, he wasn't even open to the ladies.

[Hellion Rex]

thats1evildude wrote...

What do you mean "again"? Sebastian was ladies-only.

And the ladies can keep him.
:innocent:

[Rusty Sandusky]

That is one sexy pan

[sandalisthemaker]

Actually, I have my doubts about DA:I. I think they are going to have restrictions this time around.

[Andrew Lucas]

I don't any problem with this happening again,its the way to satisfy most of the people.

[Red Panda]

Fast Jimmy wrote...

thats1evildude wrote...

What do you mean "again"? Sebastian was ladies-only.

Technically, depending on how you classify a romance, he wasn't even open to the ladies.

It counts. Not everything is to be driven by physical actions and blind lust.

[Steelcan]

I hope not, but thats probably what will happen

[Maria Caliban]

Fast Jimmy wrote...

thats1evildude wrote...

What do you mean "again"? Sebastian was ladies-only.

Technically, depending on how you classify a romance, he wasn't even open to the ladies.

I can't say how many people classify romance as ejaculating inside someone, but I can say they're all wrong.

[Grieving Natashina]

OperatingWookie wrote...

Fast Jimmy wrote...

thats1evildude wrote...

What do you mean "again"? Sebastian was ladies-only.

Technically, depending on how you classify a romance, he wasn't even open to the ladies.

It counts. Not everything is to be driven by physical actions and blind lust.

Seconded.  Chaste or not, that's still a full fledged romance. Not my cup of tea, but to each their own.   He's just unusual for BioWare; too often in all of their games, the romance is only really secure once the sex happens.

[AresKeith]

Steelcan wrote...

I hope not, but thats probably what will happen

[Iakus]

Steelcan wrote...

I hope not, but thats probably what will happen

Indeed

[Hellion Rex]

Idk why this thread even needs to exist. It's not like Bioware is directly asking us to tell them how we want romances done. They can do whatever the hell they want to do.

[ElementalFury106]

Too unrealistic. I liked how they did it in ME1 and ME2, as well as DA:O.

ME1: 2 straight romances, 1 bi romance
ME2: 6 straight romances, 1 bi romance
DA:O- 2 straight romances, 2 bi romances, several minor bi romances (sexual encounters).

ME3 and DA:2 just threw gayness and bisexuality up in our faces. Also, trannies in the **** house? Come on now.

Interpret this as "hate" if you wish, but I simply desire realistic romances if they choose to include romances at all. It is not at all realistic where each companion is bi or some stupid name like "player-sexual"

Modifié par ElementalFury106, 18 février 2014 - 12:10 .

[Br3admax]

I honestly don't care one way or the other.

[Sjofn]

You heard it here first: gay romance is unrealistic.

[Veruin]

Sjofn wrote...

You heard it here first: gay romance is unrealistic.

Considering that's not even close to what they said, you just want something be offended about, don't you?

Modifié par Veruin, 18 février 2014 - 12:14 .

[Br3admax]

Sjofn wrote...

You heard it here first: gay romance is unrealistic.

Yep that's exactly what they said. Oh wait...it isn't. 

[Hellion Rex]

ElementalFury106 wrote...

Too unrealistic. I liked how they did it in ME1 and ME2, as well as DA:O.

ME1: 2 straight romances, 1 bi romance
ME2: 6 straight romances, 1 bi romance
DA:O- 2 straight romances, 2 bi romances, several minor bi romances (sexual encounters).

ME3 and DA:2 just threw gayness and bisexuality up in our faces. Also, trannies in the **** house? Come on now.

Interpret this as "hate" if you wish, but I simply desire realistic romances if they choose to include romances at all. It is not at all realistic where each companion is bi or some stupid name like "player-sexual"

You honestly draw the line for realism at 4 bi people, when we have a world with dragons, darkspawn, blood magic, and Qunari?

[AresKeith]

Veruin wrote...

Sjofn wrote...

You heard it here first: gay romance is unrealistic.

Considering that's not even close to what they said, you just want something be offended about, don't you?

Isn't that what it usually is for the most part?

[sandalisthemaker]

ElementalFury106 wrote...


ME3 and DA:2 just threw gayness and bisexuality up in our faces. Also, trannies in the **** house? Come on now.

Oh you poor sweet thing. Did it scar you for life?

Modifié par sandalisthemaker, 18 février 2014 - 12:16 .