For starters, Bostrom's assertion can be boiled down to "it's theoretically possible that lots of simulations could be made, therefore the weight of numbers places us inside one of them". Except he doesn't consider how likely it is that a universe simulation would ever get started. I'd say it's ridiculously unlikely that anyone would ever amass enough computing power to simulate what we perceive as the universe.
It's more that its an 'inevitability', to people who believe this.
It wouldn't be decades, centuries, or even millenia (or more) from now, but at SOME point, there would be the technology to do a couple key things:
1)Manipulate the existing known universe in 'godlike' fashion
2)Create other virtual universes that replay the same basic story
If this is an inevitability, the 'chance' of us being a virtual universe is, to this idea, incredibly higher than us being a 'real' one.
So the 'singularity' concept is sometimes that:
1)At some point, Intelligence is made that can manipulate time/space
2)This Intelligence creates universes that is seeded with the concept of 'God'
3)The beings inside these universes aspire to 'surpass God'
4)This eventually creates Intelligences within these universes
5)Which then again, creates other universes, etc etc etc
It's sort of a 'if it could happen, at some point it will happen' idea, which roundabouts to the logic that yeah, if it could happen, it's more likely that we are one of those many many many simulations, than not.
I don't actually believe it, but I do find it somewhat interesting and more than enough to try to deal with it in the sci fi genre. In fact, a lot of the genre involves this.
Of course this doesn't even get into time travel, but I guess there's more the assumption that time can't be 'traveled', but just 'is', as code which can be manipulated.





Retour en haut






