The same was said when DA2 came out. People said, "this is Dragon Age and that's Mass Effect, they're not the same so ME3 won't go bad" and it did. Pre-orders are stupid, no matter what game it is that you're pre-ordering. Why should anyone give their money to developers before their game is out? It's betting it all on pure uncertainty.
I don't know what will happen with DA:I, so far I am not impressed and I think it is going the same way as Mass Effect 3, little footage, lots of promises(with no evidence) and a lot of hype. I will wait until after DA:I is released to make any judgments on it. Nonetheless, I think that the idea that you need to play a game before you can say it is good or bad is a bad one. If I'm going to spend $60 on something(on anything really) then I'd better be damn sure that it is something I will enjoy and to know if I will enjoy it, I must have an opinion about it.
The difference between ME and DA for me is that while I'm invested in the warden, Hawke and NPC characters of DA I don't have any expectation for an ongoing story involving them. Both DAO and DA2 have on the whole, for me, satisfactory endings to the characters story so DAI is starting with a clean sheet. ME3 was the climax of a trilogy that I loved and it within that context it was pretty dire. As a standalone, I guess it would be fine.
As for pre-orders, I think to say they're stupid is a little harsh, its not like the money leaves your bank account until the game ships so there's always room to cancel if the game looks bad and if you know you want the game, what's the difference? I got the signature edition of DA2 and have no regrets and if I had waited to launch and heeded the reviews I might not have bothered with it which would have been a shame. On the other hand, the less said about the ME3 collectors edition the better... you win some you lose some.





Retour en haut





