You see, it's comments like this that really show the ignorance behind your posts on this matter.
Moore's Law was proposed in 1965, and has more or less held true since 1965. So your implication that this is somehow a revolutionary concept in computer science is...to say the least, mistaken. It's been around as long as video games have been around.
In reality, the general prediction is that the trend is slowing. I've even heard of a few predictions of it running into a wall as electronics continue to approach the quantum level.
So despite decades of hardware increasing in speed and decades of video games developed exclusively for PCs, loading screens are still very alive and well in 2014. I see no reason to believe that loading screens are on their way out soon.
As I read through the page on Moore's Law, I found myself wondering whether it would be worth it or not to go ahead and prove you wrong, since what you said basically went against what I read on an admittedly subjective page that people can edit (though mods are just as strict keeping it clean). And I decided that I'd attack the problem in your argument directly instead of being drawn off into a debate about computers (which I believe the more capable members here will gladly be able to point out the flaws in your assertion much more capably than I). The flaw is that you're assuming that because loading screens exist, that it means that means that they must exist for everything. You aren't providing a formula to explain how you've reached your conclusion. In fact, you more or less said that since you can't see how something could be, it must mean that its what you think it is. You haven't named your sources either. And you haven't provided any evidence that counters what I said. Moore's Law in fact supports my statement (which you grossly mischaracterized).
Retour en haut
