181 réponses à ce sujet

[GodWood]

Garrus

[jlb524]

Maria Caliban wrote...

jlb524 wrote...

It will be Garrus... because life hates me.

But Garrus does not have BOOBS. Your message does not compute.

Who ever said one of the FemShep romance options has to have BOOBS? 

[Eternal Dust]

Please don't let it be Garrus.

Please don't let it be Garrus.

Please don't let it be Garrus.

Please don't let it be Garrus.

Please don't let it be Garrus.

Please don't let it be Garrus.

Please don't let it be Garrus.

[Spaghetti_Ninja]

Asari usually don't seem to give a damn about such silly things like gender, race, or culture. That's the impression I got from the consort and Liara anyway. They have mind-meld sex, so the personality and mind of the partner is more important than the physical shell. They don't even distinguish between men and women.

So if Samara is limited to one gender we'd have a serious plothole here. It's possible, but fairly unlikely, IMO.

Modifié par Spaghetti_Ninja, 21 janvier 2010 - 06:22 .

[ArowannaSwe]

Just give me everyone!
But I guess Samara is next, but I don't really care

I love to know all the characters in RPGs,
but most of the time, it takes more than one run to accomplish

Regards
Arowanna

[Count Viceroy]

Maria Caliban wrote...

jlb524 wrote...

Can we assume there are only 3 options per gender?

Casey Hudson specifically said three options per gender.

And THREE shall be the number of love interests per gender. Not one, not five, not two unless it be directly proceeding to THREE.

Why the hell is that so familiar? I can't put my finger on it. Reveal your source!

[Matdeception]

Casey Hudson also specifically used word play to give people reason to doubt that it was just three per gender.



Devil's advocate mode off.

[Dinkamus_Littlelog]

Maria Caliban wrote...

Casey Hudson specifically said three options per gender.

And THREE shall be the number of love interests per gender. Not one, not five, not two unless it be directly proceeding to THREE.

Didnt he also specifically say he wasnt sure if thats the right number? Maybe he was worried if he said the actual number, the Tali nutjobs would realise early?

[Kohaku]

Aradace wrote...

Joker would be hilarious...femsheps that bang him too hard will break the poor guy's legs lol

Same thing came to my mind.

[Aradace]

Spaghetti_Ninja wrote...

Asari usually don't seem to give a damn about such silly things like gender, race, or culture. That's the impression I got from the consort and Liara anyway. They have mind-meld sex, so the personality and mind of the partner is more important than the physical shell.

So if Samara is limited to one gender we'd have a serious plothole here. It's possible, but fairly unlikely, IMO.

Not necessarily...maybe she's just a sexual deviant among Asari and likes deh pennnnnnis more yea?

[Mystranna Kelteel]

Spaghetti_Ninja wrote...

So if Samara is limited to one gender we'd have a serious plothole here. It's possible, but fairly unlikely, IMO.

No we would not. Asari don't limit themselves (usually) to mating. There is absolutely nothign that suggests asari don't have specific sexual preferences for relationships, sex, and intimacy.

[Aradace]

Kerridan Kaiba wrote...

Aradace wrote...

Joker would be hilarious...femsheps that bang him too hard will break the poor guy's legs lol

Same thing came to my mind.

"Crrrrack!!! Very dramatic....I gotta be real careful when I get up to go take a ****** though..." -Joker-

[Spaghetti_Ninja]

Mystranna Kelteel wrote...

Spaghetti_Ninja wrote...

So if Samara is limited to one gender we'd have a serious plothole here. It's possible, but fairly unlikely, IMO.

No we would not. Asari don't limit themselves (usually) to mating. There is absolutely nothign that suggests asari don't have specific sexual preferences for relationships, sex, and intimacy.

But it is highly suggested that the mind of the person is the primary source of attraction. Also ''gender has no real meaning for us''. Or, we just don't give a **** what kind of squishy bits you have.

[izmirtheastarach]

Spaghetti_Ninja wrote...

Mystranna Kelteel wrote...

Spaghetti_Ninja wrote...

So if Samara is limited to one gender we'd have a serious plothole here. It's possible, but fairly unlikely, IMO.

No we would not. Asari don't limit themselves (usually) to mating. There is absolutely nothign that suggests asari don't have specific sexual preferences for relationships, sex, and intimacy.

But it is highly suggested that the mind of the person is the primary source of attraction. Also ''gender has no real meaning for us''. Or, we just don't give a **** what kind of squishy bits you have.

That's sort of a semantic argument. What if their preference is female minds?

Modifié par izmirtheastarach, 21 janvier 2010 - 06:25 .

[Aradace]

Spaghetti_Ninja wrote...

Mystranna Kelteel wrote...

Spaghetti_Ninja wrote...

So if Samara is limited to one gender we'd have a serious plothole here. It's possible, but fairly unlikely, IMO.

No we would not. Asari don't limit themselves (usually) to mating. There is absolutely nothign that suggests asari don't have specific sexual preferences for relationships, sex, and intimacy.

But it is highly suggested that the mind of the person is the primary source of attraction. Also ''gender has no real meaning for us''. Or, we just don't give a **** what kind of squishy bits you have.

No...the mind is the primary source for actually "producing offspring" is more closely to the truth....Hence why they dont need a specific "gender"

[Mystranna Kelteel]

Spaghetti_Ninja wrote...

But it is highly suggested that the mind of the person is the primary source of attraction. Also ''gender has no real meaning for us''. Or, we just don't give a **** what kind of squishy bits you have.

That doesn't mean a specific asari wouldn't limit herself. It actually makes logical sense for an asari to be sexually attracted primarily to are solely to either another asari or a female human due to the obvious nature of asari.

[shinobi602]

Casey specifically teased us when he said "3 per gender". Right after he said "If I can count correctly!"

I'm almost certain he was just teasing. He also said there's more surprises there that he won't mention. I'm certain there's more than 3.

Modifié par shinobi602, 21 janvier 2010 - 06:26 .

[Aradace]

Mystranna Kelteel wrote...

Spaghetti_Ninja wrote...

But it is highly suggested that the mind of the person is the primary source of attraction. Also ''gender has no real meaning for us''. Or, we just don't give a **** what kind of squishy bits you have.

That doesn't mean a specific asari wouldn't limit herself. It actually makes logical sense for an asari to be sexually attracted primarily to are solely to either another asari or a female human due to the obvious nature of asari.

Benezia is a good example of this.

[Sergiyftw]

Actually i think it's not Samara, from what i've read they give up everything to do with love for becoming "peacekeepers" she's some sort of.. agent?

[N30795]

It would be strange if the third romancable squadie for F-Shep is not Samara. They do need a F/F (but not so F/F, huuum) for the fanboys. 

[Calla S]

shinobi602 wrote...

Casey specifically teased us when he said "3 per gender". Right after he said "If I can count correctly!"

I'm almost certain he was just teasing. He also said there's more surprises there that he won't mention. I'm certain there's more than 3.

This! Exactly this!

Coupled with all the teasing we've been getting, the only thing we're missing on the Tali/Garrus/Samara front is actual confirmation.

[jlb524]

Mystranna Kelteel wrote...

That doesn't mean a specific asari wouldn't limit herself. It actually makes logical sense for an asari to be sexually attracted primarily to are solely to either another asari or a female human due to the obvious nature of asari.

Yes X 1000. 

Species-wide, the asari can mate with any gender from any species.  This DOES NOT mean that individual asari don't have preferences for one species or one gender from a species.

For all we know, Liara might only prefer humans.

[Aradace]

Sergiyftw wrote...

Actually i think it's not Samara, from what i've read they give up everything to do with love for becoming "peacekeepers" she's some sort of.. agent?

True but there's also a line shot by her saying something along the lines of "My lovers spend their last moment wrapped in utter ecstasy" or something like that.

[shinobi602]

Sergiyftw wrote...

Actually i think it's not Samara, from what i've read they give up everything to do with love for becoming "peacekeepers" she's some sort of.. agent?

You've read wrong. Nothing mentioned about love. They don't have children though.

[Eternal Dust]

Aradace wrote...

Sergiyftw wrote...

Actually i think it's not Samara, from what i've read they give up everything to do with love for becoming "peacekeepers" she's some sort of.. agent?

True but there's also a line shot by her saying something along the lines of "My lovers spend their last moment wrapped in utter ecstasy" or something like that.

That was Morinth, her doppleganger.