I rented Batman: Arkham Knight and am glad that I did so, because the ending is something I'll only see once due to having to get 100% completion to see it (which included the Riddler trophies much to my dismay). This game did a few things right, but I feel that Arkham City was the better game in the end. I really disliked most of the boss fights, the only ones I liked were Two-Face and Penguin, I would have liked the final Arkham Knight fight if not for the cheap death traps.
As I said to Clones, I feel like Rocksteady wanted to make a movie at times, things that would have worked in a movie did not work well in the game
The Batmobile gameplay was fun when it was regulated to battles, but when it involved racing or maneuvering; no. I was really disappointed with how the combat for
were handled in particular. Those fights could have been so special. Also, Rocksteady missed out on having The Creeper in the game and they had one hell of an opportunity
As for the Arkham Knight's Identity:
For that matter, how the hell did the Arkham Knight come up with enough money for an army and the drones? I think one of the tapes had him discussing with Scarecrow that he needed $2 Billion, but there is no way that Scarecrow could have came up with all of that money ahead of the events in this game. On another note: There is no way in hell that $2 Billion would have been enough for all those drones and to train an army.
I also disliked the ending because it was plothole galore.
As for what happened at the end of the game, I'd speculate that
You know what else really bugs me? Batman could have got out of the predicament at the end
In short, they should have kept Paul Dini and I'm glad I spent $7 renting it for 5 nights instead of the $30 I could have bought it for on Ebay because I cannot be bothered to go and collect all the Riddler things a second time. It took me 12 hours to collect all of the trophies and probably 8-10 to beat the main story, that's not right.