Batman: Arkham Knight
#101
Posté 06 mars 2014 - 04:58
Terrifying, yet appealing for some reason.
Dibs on my boy DeathStroke tho.
@Para Medic
Origins hinted at a suicide squad game.
But yes he does. I wish to beat up the Teen Titans.
#102
Posté 06 mars 2014 - 05:03
The idea of a coop Arkham game fills my head with the image of gamers fighting over who gets to be Batman and who has to be Robin.
I would pick Robin every time.
#103
Posté 06 mars 2014 - 05:09
A co-op Arkham game sounds really good.
Which is why it can never be.
I'm terms of challenge map characters however, my favorite one is Deathstroke. He played better than Batman IMO. Had he been given his Sword and Guns Slade would've been perfect.
I sincerely hope that Rocksteady would find it in their hearts to add a co-op challenge room as DLC. I would be fine with that.
Deathstroke was such a disappointment in Arkham: Origins (gameplay-wise), they essentially took Robin from Arkham City, threw a Deathstroke skin on him, and then tweaked a couple of his moves, and gave him armor.
I would have liked to see a unique character (animation, power/abilities) rather than a mashup of pre-existing ones; the fact that he used his sword in SP but not in Challenge mode was annoying.
#104
Posté 06 mars 2014 - 05:23
#105
Posté 06 mars 2014 - 05:28
I agree, but he seemed less...floaty than Bats did.
Having only one eye saves weight.
#106
Posté 06 mars 2014 - 06:29
Make Cain or Stephanie Brown playable in the story and I'm all for co-op. Or at the very least Catwoman again. Although I'd rather want Bat-girl to show up.
#107
Posté 06 mars 2014 - 06:47
Seriously Stephanie's awesome, what's DCs problem with her?
#108
Posté 06 mars 2014 - 10:08
Just because the Bat-girls haven't shown up yet doesn't mean they aren't there. Pretty much every Batman character have had a role in the games in some form. Robin had his time in the Arkham DLC, and I'd much rather see a new character be playable like Catwoman was in Arkham City. Also, 'D-Grayson", whom I'll remind you, has had no significant part to play in any of the Arkham games either. In fact, none of the Robins have added anything overall important to the narrative at all - So there's no reason as to why not having Batgirl show up or even better, Huntress or Batwoman.
I'd hardly call a 2 hour DLC that you spent half the time playing as Robin as 'Had his time'.
It's not impossible, I just find it highly unlikely that at this stage in the universe's development they could believably put in a Batgirl that has been active for over a year. It's just an odd request to want them to exclude Robin in favor of Batgirl when Robin is much more intertwined to Batman's character in the comics.
#109
Posté 06 mars 2014 - 10:12
As much as I like the various Batgirls, I do agree.
Both Batgirl and Batwoman were only created initially to prove Batman and Robin weren't gay by giving them Love interests.
Ironic given Modern day Batwoman is openly gay. But that's for another day.
Robins more well known.
#110
Posté 06 mars 2014 - 10:43
I'd hardly call a 2 hour DLC that you spent half the time playing as Robin as 'Had his time'.
It's not impossible, I just find it highly unlikely that at this stage in the universe's development they could believably put in a Batgirl that has been active for over a year. It's just an odd request to want them to exclude Robin in favor of Batgirl when Robin is much more intertwined to Batman's character in the comics.
And I'd hardly call the few scenarios in Arkham City where Catwoman got to play her story to be 'Her time in the spotlight' but there it is. He's been there, even had a big challenge map DLC dedicated to him. This is the last game in Rocksteady's planned Batman games, so requesting Batgirl, who hasn't even made an appearance yet, it's not such a bad thing from my perspective. Robin is intertwined to Batman in the sense that he's basically the same character, same broody stoic attitude ('course referring to Grayson here and I'm aware Drake is the current Robin in the games). The Batgirl persona serves as a nice counterpoint to the broodyness of Bruce Wayne and would feel like a welcome addition to the game. I suppose my dislike towards Robin is mainly based around Grayson's annoying broody-angsty-teenager-attitude & Drake (in the Arkham-verse) basically being Peter Parker/Troy Baker himself, dressed as a bird. Also I'd rather Arkham Knight adding more new characters, instead of always bringing back the Penguin, or whatever, as a villain. Think the same could count for the other side of the spectrum.
#111
Posté 06 mars 2014 - 11:23
Snowflame for Arkham Knight.
#112
Posté 07 mars 2014 - 11:37
Really? Do you have anything I can read on that?
Oh, and here are the images from the Game Informer article that I stumbled upon, in case anyone hasn't seen them already.
- Sir Edric aime ceci
#113
Posté 07 mars 2014 - 12:17
I want this game so much.
#114
Posté 07 mars 2014 - 03:45
Stephanie Brown in something? Dan Didio says nay...for some reason.
Seriously Stephanie's awesome, what's DCs problem with her?
I loved her interactions with Damian.
#115
Posté 28 mars 2014 - 10:48
#116
Posté 28 mars 2014 - 12:06
Just a Batclone? I find that disappointing unless it turns out he is Jason like mentioned in that article.
#117
Posté 28 mars 2014 - 12:37
Just a Batclone? I find that disappointing unless it turns out he is Jason like mentioned in that article.
Maybe he's Batman Beyond turned evil! ![]()
#118
Posté 28 mars 2014 - 01:59
Bane is (IMO) one of the things that Batman: Arkham Origins got right. He is more then the big, dumb brute that Rocksteady seems to like depicting him as; which is odd considering they have done so well with all the other Batman characters. I liked how Origins Bane would actually use his intelligence and cunning to get what he wanted, and it was this intelligence, not his Venom induced strength, that enabled him to Break the Bat.
Compare this to Arkham: City Bane, who Batman traps in a flimsy, 60 year old freight elevator.
Yea Bane was one of the best things about Origins
#120
Posté 21 mai 2014 - 02:20
The car looks like a mix between the classic Batmobile and the Nolan tank -- I'm actually disappointed if we only end up playing as Batman again. I liked playing as Catwoman, or the general idea of playing as someone other than Batman only. Nevertheless, this Bat-fan is excited.
- Mr.House, The Love Runner et Milan92 aiment ceci
#121
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
Posté 21 mai 2014 - 02:32
Guest_Catch This Fade_*
The car looks like a mix between the classic Batmobile and the Nolan tank -- I'm actually disappointed if we only end up playing as Batman again. I liked playing as Catwoman, or the general idea of playing as someone other than Batman only. Nevertheless, this Bat-fan is excited.
You get to play as Batmobile too. DUH! ![]()
- The Love Runner et Milan92 aiment ceci
#122
Posté 21 mai 2014 - 03:27
*reads the article, Oracle is playing a larger role*
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Also the Arkham Knight is going to be HUSH guys, come on.
#123
Posté 21 mai 2014 - 03:46
Wouldn't be so certain that it is Hush. Rocksteady stated that this Batsuit guy is an original character created for this game. Of course that could mean that the suite is a character in itself and not the person inside, but I doubt that is the case.
#124
Posté 21 mai 2014 - 03:47
Hush is a plot thread that was left hanging in Arkham City. He definitely needs to appear and hopefully as more than just a cameo.
#125
Posté 21 mai 2014 - 04:38
Also the Arkham Knight is going to be HUSH guys, come on.
I don't think so. Arkham Knight suppose to be a new character, created by Rocksteady.





Retour en haut






