And yet that doesn't change what happened; Orlais and Tevinter buddied up against the Darkspawn (and Orlais showed great valor in particular) while the Dales did their best to stay out of it. Even not knowing about broodmothers, the Darkspawn still spread taint and ruin land for decades, if not centuries. Staying neutral against an enemy against all living things earns them nothing.
Iloren and his people were fighting in the Anderfels, although the Dales didn't help their enemy, Orlais.
There's also the simple fact that the Grey Wardens often have to coax nations into getting involved, but the kingdoms drop their involvement once the darkspawn return underground, to the Deep Roads.
The dwarves alone fight the darkspawn while humans and elves alike have "stayed neutral" about the problem.
Are you going with the "well, you can leave!" defense again? Because being indoctrinated (depending on your Keeper/Storyteller) against all other creatures in Thedas, and expecting to be able to live among them (ignorant of their laws and customs) while treating them with disdain is such a better option?
The Dalish aren't taught to be against all other creatures. They avoid the human societies where their religion is criminalized, their mages are outlaws, and their culture is forbidden and vilified.
I don't even understand your last statement; I don't believe we've seen religious police in Thedas who ensure all follow the White Divine.
It's stated that the elven pantheon is illegal by Chantry law. I'm not certain why you find this hard to understand.
As you have stated yourself, DA:O allowed the Warden to be an atheist and disbelief all gods. And while this might have gotten some nasty reactions from people, they don't attack you.
They also don't attack The Warden for being a mage, even though we are repeatedly told Andrastian lynch mobs have killed mages who did nothing wrong. That doesn't disprove the fact that the elven pantheon was outlawed by the Chantry.
If that's the case, you're looking at it under the influence of some delusion. Yes, Burkel wants to convert other dwarves to the Chant of Light; but nothing has shown that he wouldn't be willing to assist someone who wanted to hold to the Stone.
No, I'm addressing Burkel expressed disdain for people of other faiths, and cut off dialogue with my Warden for condemning him for it. I'm not certain why you have such an attitude with me simply because I dislike the character.
He did everything legally (petitioning the Shaperate and all). If you're going to use conjured fears from nothing out of evidence, what is to stop me from saying that someone like Anders was no better than Drakon? Is he not assisting people to make use of them later on for his cause (which, you know, we actually have evidence of)?
You're conflating two entirely different statements from me. Burkel cut off conversation with my Warden because he expressed a viewpoint that clashed with Burkel's own; in-character.
I also addressed that I wasn't incentivized to empower the Chantry by letting them get a foothold in Orzammar, outside of in-character perspective. That's the likely outcome of helping Burkel with his efforts to give the Chantry power in dwarven society, regardless of his own intentions. It's why I never changed my approach on subsequent playthroughs with that specific character I created for my eventual canon run with my Surana Warden.