Aller au contenu

Photo

Elf inquisitior is Dalish only


1079 réponses à ce sujet

#926
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages

Rivain had a policy of tolerance... just not one approved from Val Royeaux. The Grand Cleric and the Knight Commander in Darsmuid must've known what was going on and never once signalled the rest of the order. Probably for the reasons you speculated. Pragmatism tend to weigh higher than ideology when you don't have a lot of power to wield.

 

Which is probably true for the Dalish as well. Though... unlike the pantheists, they would've have much popular support protecting them. And unlike the qunari, does not have a warmachine backing them...and yet that lot was massacred despite a peace accord protecting them.

 

Which leads me to conclude that the Rivaini Chantry is a very paradoxical thing. Tolerates Dalish, pantheists and is very liberal with it's circle... unforgiving to qunari converts.

 

I suspect all chantries are like that... the Anderfels one probably is very supportive of the Wardens. The Nevarran one does not bat an eyelash at Mortalitisi and is happy to mummify, not burn, the dead.

 

And why not? The Chantry has always been more reflective of the local concerns than imposing a single viewpoint across the continent.

 

 

Mind you, I wouldn't assume anything about Rivian until we get actually useful context about it. There are other reasons for 'tolerance' than benevolence: we can look to corruption, greater-good arguments, common foes, or even malevolent machinations.

 

We know very little about Rivian society in the practical context, and even less about how the Seers actually see and are seen by their society. For all the assumptions that Rivian is a benevolent success story of magic and sweet old ladies like Wynn... well, to date they remain just that. Certainly the DA team's portrayal of matriarchy in practice has spurred many a devoted opponent sworn to tearing down the instution of great female influence (and many of the most powerful women in their settings).

 

'Women are benevolent leaders' is far from a theme of the franchise.


  • Sir JK aime ceci

#927
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages

1) What laws in Ferelden?

 

2) Under what circumstances?  

 

3) The Chantry controls almost everything in Kirkwall.  The Templar order is a part of the Chantry.  The old Viscount was a puppet for Meredith, as many NPCs will attest to.

 

4) Does Merrill openly worship the Creators?  Other than some remarks to Hawke, it doesn't look that way.

 

5) The City Guard doesn't care, largely because of Aveline.  Good thing no Templars saw Marethari, but they avoid the slums  Alienage.

 

6) The Templars still try to go out and arrest the Dalish for existing.  Their law would have superseded secular law.  Shoot, Aveline had to fight just to keep her position open.

 

Heh, and people say that mages should not be rulers.  Fair enough I guess, but neither should Templars and the Chantry.  

 

 

Name me one time outside of Wardens where the Chantry didn't have a final say so.  Just one time, outside of the Grey Wardens, that we've seen in the games.  

 

I ask for game examples because I haven't been able to get the books yet.  Last minute bills came up, but I'll be rectifying that this weekend.  So until I read the books, please don't give me any examples from them.  It'll be meaningless until I can read the events for myself.

 

Please, some countries can't take a leak without a Chanter barking the Chant at them or a Templar accusing them of hiding their sister's boyfriend's nephew's brother's cousin's former roommate, that happened to be an apostate.

 

1) Abduction & assault -> City Elf Origin

 

2) In the middle of a wedding.

 

3) And yet, we have worshippers and militants of another religion (Qunari) openly converting elves, we have Dalish parked outside the city, and, have you considered that, just maybe, that was because of Meredith and not Elthina?

 

4) Wouldn't know.  She still is a non-Andrastian living in a city which you claim is a theocracy.

 

5) I'm fairly certain the same thing happens if Aveline isn't Captain, so I'm not sure you can use that as a reason.

 

6) Harboring apostates & were previous hosts of a maleficar (Merrill).  The Dalish were also not moving.  Halla or no, they could have moved farther away from the settlement (which is how they typically avoid trouble).

 

I don't believe I've seen anyone advocating that the Divine rule over Thedas.

 

'k.

  1. Shale DLC:  Mage lives outside of the Circle because of a favor from the King.  Which is not something that the Chantry would appreciate.
  2. City Elf Origin : Abduction and kidnapping mid-wedding.
  3. Landsmeet: Get the Grand Cleric to denounce Loghain, you can still lose the Landsmeet (she does count for more points than anything but Anora, though.  Like I said, the Chantry does have influence).

I don't recall that happening at all, I'm afraid.

 

---

 

 

You seem to continually ignore the fact that the Dalish have oral and written history. Also, sending armed and armored drug addicts who think they have dominion over mages by divine right into sovereign territory can certainly be seen as an act of aggression.

 

It takes a royal boon from the Dwarven Hero of Ferelden for Ferelden to assist dwarven society in fighting the darkspawn.


Two humans encroach close to a Dalish camp, with Tamlen and the Dalish protagonist trying to find out if they mean their people any harm. Nothing was done to warrant a lynch mob trying to harm and kill an entire Dalish clan.

 

It's addressed that worship of the elven pantheon is forbidden: "We were not enslaved as we had been before, but our worship of the ancient gods was now forbidden. We were allowed to live among the humans only as second-class citizens who worshipped their Maker, forgetting once more the scraps of lore we had maintained through the centuries."

 

Also, according to the "Llomerryn Accords", Qunari converts have been killed for their religious views: "It's worth noting, however, that the Kingdom of Rivain immediately violated the treaty. Twice. Once, when the humans of northern Rivain—nearly all practitioners of the Qun and therefore by definition, "Qunari"—refused to leave their homes and go in exile to the islands. And again, when the Rivain Chantry and nationalist forces, unable to convert its people back to the worship of the Maker, tried a purge by the sword, slaughtering countless unarmed people and burying them in mass graves. It's a fortunate mystery that the leaders in Kont-aar did not alert their allies in the Northern Passage, or we'd still be fighting the giants now."

 

Also, it addressed that entire towns of Qun converts have been killed: "As each year passed, the Chantry pushed further and further into the Qunari lines. Dealing with those of the local populace which had converted to the Qunari religion proved difficult, especially as some of these had lived under the qun now for generations, and the response by many armies was simply to exterminate all those who had converted. Officially the Chantry denies this, claiming most converts fled north into Rivain and Par Vollen, but the mass graves at Nocen Fields and Marnus Pell attest otherwise. Indeed, so many were slain at Marnus Pell that the Veil is said to be permanently sundered, the ruins still plagued by restless corpses to this day."

 

Considering that the Dalish claim that the Chantry started the war against the Dales, your phrasing could use some work. At this point, no player is in a position to know what happened, but it's interesting to note that the elves were forced to submit to human rule and convert, while the Dalish effectively became outlaws because they refused to surrender their mages or convert to the human religion.

 

Also, the mages are under the authority of the Chantry controlled Circles (with the exception of Grey Wardens); otherwise, they are apostates or maleficar, illegal mages according to Chantry law. Apostates are addressed any mage "who does not fall under the auspices of the Circle of Magi (and therefore the Chantry)." The apostate codex further reads: "No matter how a mage has become apostate, the Chantry treats them alike: Templars begin a systematic hunt to bring the apostate to justice. In almost all cases, "justice" is execution. If there is some overriding reason the mage should live, the Rite of Tranquility is employed instead. Whether we of the Circle of Magi believe this system fair is irrelevant: It is what it is."

 

Furthermore, interfering in with the actions of a templar is viewed as an offense against the Maker. It's also addressed (by Alistair) that even the nobility can't interfere with a templar's duty, or imprison a templar. I'm not certain why you're even disputing this. It's said that the issue that arose with the Magi Boon was that kingdoms don't have control over mages - the Chantry does.

 

Yes, the Dalish do have written history.  But most of what we get is oral history.  Which is horrible for accuracy.  It might make a fine story though.  And it's always fresh, changes every time!

So you're okay with missionaries being assaulted and their church not doing anything to ensure their safety?  The Templar came after; so sayeth the Dalish.

 

And that means that it was never offered in the past?  We know that Old Tevinter and the Dwarves had strong ties.  As it is currently, we only know for certain that a conservative King of Orzammar denied aid when it was offered from a non-Warden.

 

Two humans are wandering the woods when two savage elves hold them at bow-point.  The Dalish, being nomads, move around often enough, so it isn't like these two humans were spying.  I realize it's like, the Dalish thing in Origins to greet all non-Dalish visitors terribly, but that wins them no points.

 

And yet, none of that is happening in the present.  At worst, a Chantry member is rude to you after you deny a blessing she was offering.  The Qunari recruit freely from the Alienage, and live in Kirkwall. 

 

You're still going on about that?  The Dalish are wrong.  At absolute worst, Orlais started the conflict, not the Chantry.  The war did not start out with an exalted march.  The Alienages were created out of an attempt at mercy in a much more brutal age. 

 

Yes, Circles do belong to the Chantry.  But, as I've pointed out time and time again, nobility still get special perks and favors from it.  Connor can see his father, a mage can live outside of the Circle.  What I don't see are, outside of Kirkwall to an extent, Templar taking over sovereign lands and forces during an apostate hunt.

 

See above.

 

 

 

 

 

You mean the bandits? Yes, the bandits outside Lothering run away, while Mother Hannah assures an Amell Warden that a lynch mob won't try to kill him for being a mage.

 

 

Burkel cut off the conversation with my Surana Warden because my Warden condemned his view of non-Andrastians; you also seem to be forgetting that Burkel is speaking to the protagonist directly.

 

Also, my Warden has seen the benefits that the Andrastian faith has provided to the impoverished elves of the Alienage. 

 

As for me, personally: giving the Chantry a foothold over the dwarves of Orzammar seemed like a grave mistake, especially after what happened to the Dales, so I was never incentivized to take a different course of action.

 

 

I didn't have a problem with Fenris finding comfort in the Andrastian faith, which was fairly peaceful.

 

 

Yes.  And a better example would have been Wynne, instead of the grown mage who can simply leave the town to zombies.

 

Frankly, you probably went with "I'm not going to help spread your lies", so you started the hostility.  He's perfectly civil.  And he's speaking to the Warden, not you.

 

You do realize that the Alienage is a paradise compared to Dust Town, right?

 

I'm not sure how to handle this statement. 

  1. The Chantry already has influence with Orzammar because of the Lyrium trade.
  2. You're so concerned with the possible politics that you're denying some of the worst off in Thedas (Tevinter blood slaves may have it worse) any sort of hope, change or belief that they aren't worthless pieces of rubble that will never be accepted by the Stone and be anything more than criminals, whores, or dead.
  3. Brother Burkel helps out the poor and casteless.  If they come to him, he tries to help.  While I agree with Xil that he should try and direct them to the surface, that would almost certainly be worse than the Chantry.
  4. The Dales denied missionaries & kicked them out.  That's the complete opposite of letting them open up a Chantry in the Dales.  That part of your statement just doesn't make sense.

You say that, but then I look at the above and frankly I'm not buying it.


  • Master Warder Z_ aime ceci

#928
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

The Dales codex is only partly opposed to the WoT, since it could've meant that Maferath gave the Dales to the elves.
Maybe WoT meant that Andraste and Maferath already promised to the elves the Dales before the end of the war.

 

That could have been the agreement brokered between Shartan and Andraste, since Shartan and his people fought hard to earn their freedom. According to the codex entry 'Dark Moon': "They say that Shartan's followers stole whatever they could find to make weapons. They fought with knives of sharpened stone and glass, and with bows made from broken barrels or firewood. This bow was ox horn, made in secret over the course of months by a slave who worked in the slaughterhouses of Minrathous.

 

"The slave's name has been lost to history, and the verses that spoke of his deeds, stricken from the chant, but the weapon endures."



#929
dragonflight288

dragonflight288
  • Members
  • 8 852 messages

1) What laws in Ferelden?

 

2) Under what circumstances?  

 

3) The Chantry controls almost everything in Kirkwall.  The Templar order is a part of the Chantry.  The old Viscount was a puppet for Meredith, as many NPCs will attest to.

 

4) Does Merrill openly worship the Creators?  Other than some remarks to Hawke, it doesn't look that way.

 

5) The City Guard doesn't care, largely because of Aveline.  Good thing no Templars saw Marethari, but they avoid the slums  Alienage.

 

6) The Templars still try to go out and arrest the Dalish for existing.  Their law would have superseded secular law.  Shoot, Aveline had to fight just to keep her position open.

 

Heh, and people say that mages should not be rulers.  Fair enough I guess, but neither should Templars and the Chantry.  

 

 

Name me one time outside of Wardens where the Chantry didn't have a final say so.  Just one time, outside of the Grey Wardens, that we've seen in the games.  

 

 

 

There isn't any. 



#930
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages

Just noticed the point about the Chantry running everything in Kirkwall, and I got to say- that's missing a significant element of the DA2 context, which was that Meredith and the Templars had outgrown the Chantry's control.

 

Meredith was the most powerful person in the city, not her nominal boss Elthina, and the Chantry has never had the sort of operational control or dominance over the Templars to justify calling them a united faction. The Templars are deferential, but separate as both an institution and a chain of command. (Which, in the end, is why they break free of the Chantry.)

 

This Viscount was a patsy for Meredith (sort of: he didn't have enough power to be powerful on her behalf), but Meredith was not a patsy for the Chantry. When it comes to Kirkwall, it's very important to understand that it is a bastion of Templar influence, not Chantry influence: the former supports the later in the sense they are allied, but the later does not overshadow or direct the former.


  • Master Warder Z_ et KaiserShep aiment ceci

#931
dragonflight288

dragonflight288
  • Members
  • 8 852 messages

Just noticed the point about the Chantry running everything in Kirkwall, and I got to say- that's missing a significant element of the DA2 context, which was that Meredith and the Templars had outgrown the Chantry's control.

 

Meredith was the most powerful person in the city, not her nominal boss Elthina, and the Chantry has never had the sort of operational control or dominance over the Templars to justify calling them a united faction. The Templars are deferential, but separate as both an institution and a chain of command. (Which, in the end, is why they break free of the Chantry.)

 

This Viscount was a patsy for Meredith (sort of: he didn't have enough power to be powerful on her behalf), but Meredith was not a patsy for the Chantry. When it comes to Kirkwall, it's very important to understand that it is a bastion of Templar influence, not Chantry influence: the former supports the later in the sense they are allied, but the later does not overshadow or direct the former.

 

Unless a Seeker who answers directly to the Chantry and the Divine happened to come along and investigate Kirkwall and decide to remove Meredith, force her into an early retirement in Val Reyeaux and allow Cullen to step up to the plate as the new Knight-Commander.

 

Which never happened at all. 

 

It's true that Meredith was the most powerful person in Kirkwall, but as a templar she is still subservient to the Seekers, and if the Divine was taking Kirkwall seriously, the Seekers should've as well. If they never showed up, it's either a sign of gross incompetence, or like the First Warden with Amaranthine, have a vested interest in seeing if the templars can maintain that level of control and use it as a precedent to set up similar systems elsewhere. 


  • LobselVith8 aime ceci

#932
Shadow Fox

Shadow Fox
  • Members
  • 4 206 messages

Unless a Seeker who answers directly to the Chantry and the Divine happened to come along and investigate Kirkwall and decide to remove Meredith, force her into an early retirement in Val Reyeaux and allow Cullen to step up to the plate as the new Knight-Commander.

 

Which never happened at all. 

 

It's true that Meredith was the most powerful person in Kirkwall, but as a templar she is still subservient to the Seekers, and if the Divine was taking Kirkwall seriously, the Seekers should've as well. If they never showed up, it's either a sign of gross incompetence, or like the First Warden with Amaranthine, have a vested interest in seeing if the templars can maintain that level of control and use it as a precedent to set up similar systems elsewhere. 

I'd rather have Thrask or the Templar hunting Quentin then Cullen as KC.



#933
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages

Thrask would be one of the worst imaginable Knight-Commanders to ever take up the role.



#934
Daerog

Daerog
  • Members
  • 4 857 messages

Y'know, I do hope that more info on the Dalish is released with the PC elf being Dalish only.

 

From the info we have, and the perspectives we have been given, I am not a fan of the Dalish.

 

However, if DA:I gives us a more Dalish perspective, be able to see more Dalish clans and the variety and complexity of dalish beliefs and traditions, it could make me like them more.

 

Here's to hoping for more Dalish info, perspective, and characters in Inquisition. Maybe even a Dalish centered DLC, either separate campaign or not. Some people were wanting a Qunari one, a Dalish one sounds good as well.



#935
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 819 messages

but as a templar she is still subservient to the Seekers, and if the Divine was taking Kirkwall seriously, the Seekers should've as well. If they never showed up, it's either a sign of gross incompetence. 

 

Or you know gameplay reasons.

 

Given she was set to be one of the Primary Antagonists.



#936
Shadow Fox

Shadow Fox
  • Members
  • 4 206 messages

Thrask would be one of the worst imaginable Knight-Commanders to ever take up the role.

Better than Cullen who'd be just as bad as Meredith.



#937
themageguy

themageguy
  • Members
  • 3 176 messages

Some Dalish elves live according to certain codes. One of these codes is one adopted by hunters of the clan, called Vir Tanadhal, translating to the "Way of Three Trees" of the "the Ways of the Hunter." This is broken down into three parts, which was said to have been taught by the Goddess of the hunt, Andruil.
 
The other code is the Vir Atish'an, The Way of Peace, which is harder to follow, and it's stated few follow Sylaise the Hearthkeeper's path. I wonder if the codes are going to be addressed in the narrative with the Dalish Inquisitor.


That would be so excellent.

#938
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages

Better than Cullen who'd be just as bad as Meredith.

You say this based on what? Cullen was one of the Templars willing to stand up to Meredith after she crossed the line. Cullen has a professional outlook on his tasks as a Templar, but he is not heartless. He is pretty much the perfect Templar.



#939
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages

Unless a Seeker who answers directly to the Chantry and the Divine happened to come along and investigate Kirkwall and decide to remove Meredith, force her into an early retirement in Val Reyeaux and allow Cullen to step up to the plate as the new Knight-Commander.

 

Which never happened at all. 

 

It's true that Meredith was the most powerful person in Kirkwall, but as a templar she is still subservient to the Seekers, and if the Divine was taking Kirkwall seriously, the Seekers should've as well. If they never showed up, it's either a sign of gross incompetence, or like the First Warden with Amaranthine, have a vested interest in seeing if the templars can maintain that level of control and use it as a precedent to set up similar systems elsewhere. 

 

Correction: as a Templar she should be subservient to the seekers- but the Templars growing too strong makes seeker involvement a problem, not necessarily a solution. Internal investigators are only as effective as the willingness of those being investigated cooperate, and any good cop knows that you can't rely on authority alone when confronting people who aren't impressed by it.

 

Mind you, the Seeker would also need grounds to remove Meredith before attempting to do so. Being unpopular isn't enough, especially when a great deal of that unpopularity was a result of cracking down on corruption and criminal activity that was actually taking place. Neither are the crimes of others against Meredith's will.

 

Since, from a number of institutional perspectives, Meredith was succeeding in advancing a number of fields (reducing corruption in the nobility that was defying/circumventing the Circle system, defeating corruption and smuggling within the Circle system, confronting apostate and blood magic support networks), and had a few significant successes behind her (preventing the previous Viscount from ejecting the Templars from the city, helping save the city from a Qunari invasion, raising the power of the Chantry and it's ally in the city and getting new levels of support and resources for what might have been a fading order), there would need to be some serious dirt and wrongdoing to justify removing her.

 

Which would be... what, her being an ass? Being hard on a circle when there actually is a suspected conspiracy at work escalating tensions? Removing Meredith would de-escalate tensions, but the tensions are a symptom of the pre-existing problems, not the cause.



#940
Hanako Ikezawa

Hanako Ikezawa
  • Members
  • 29 692 messages

Why are we talking about Templar stuff in a thread about the Dalish?



#941
EmissaryofLies

EmissaryofLies
  • Members
  • 2 695 messages

Why are we talking about Templar stuff in a thread about the Dalish?

 

Templars, Mages and the Dalish will forever be in a devil's threesome.

 

That's why.



#942
dragonflight288

dragonflight288
  • Members
  • 8 852 messages

Templars, Mages and the Dalish will forever be in a devil's threesome.

 

That's why.

 

Also because the templars often hunt the Dalish, so there is a connection. 


  • LobselVith8 aime ceci

#943
Lulupab

Lulupab
  • Members
  • 5 455 messages

Correction: as a Templar she should be subservient to the seekers- but the Templars growing too strong makes seeker involvement a problem, not necessarily a solution. Internal investigators are only as effective as the willingness of those being investigated cooperate, and any good cop knows that you can't rely on authority alone when confronting people who aren't impressed by it.

 

Mind you, the Seeker would also need grounds to remove Meredith before attempting to do so. Being unpopular isn't enough, especially when a great deal of that unpopularity was a result of cracking down on corruption and criminal activity that was actually taking place. Neither are the crimes of others against Meredith's will.

 

Since, from a number of institutional perspectives, Meredith was succeeding in advancing a number of fields (reducing corruption in the nobility that was defying/circumventing the Circle system, defeating corruption and smuggling within the Circle system, confronting apostate and blood magic support networks), and had a few significant successes behind her (preventing the previous Viscount from ejecting the Templars from the city, helping save the city from a Qunari invasion, raising the power of the Chantry and it's ally in the city and getting new levels of support and resources for what might have been a fading order), there would need to be some serious dirt and wrongdoing to justify removing her.

 

Which would be... what, her being an ass? Being hard on a circle when there actually is a suspected conspiracy at work escalating tensions? Removing Meredith would de-escalate tensions, but the tensions are a symptom of the pre-existing problems, not the cause.

 

Ever played any War hammer dawn of war game or know about the lore? In Imperium of man there is no other consequences for corruption at its tiniest bits, there is only death. The people policing the police are chosen with utmost care and have authority over everything else. If they decide someone is corrupted, they die. No questions asked no strings attached. That is why the corrupt can never stay in the society no matter how good they are in hiding. They will be found out and executed.



#944
andar91

andar91
  • Members
  • 4 752 messages

I don't mind, but what I'm curious about is if it's different if you're a mage. I mean, we were ONLY a Circle mage in Origins, but in Inquisition, are we a First or something to a Dalish Keeper if elven or Circle Mage if human? What about Qunari?



#945
Mistic

Mistic
  • Members
  • 2 199 messages

Why are we talking about Templar stuff in a thread about the Dalish?

 

For the same reason the Dalish or the Qunari pop up time and time again in other threads, I suppose ;)

 

 

Some Dalish elves live according to certain codes. One of these codes is one adopted by hunters of the clan, called Vir Tanadhal, translating to the "Way of Three Trees" of the "the Ways of the Hunter." This is broken down into three parts, which was said to have been taught by the Goddess of the hunt, Andruil.
 
The other code is the Vir Atish'an, The Way of Peace, which is harder to follow, and it's stated few follow Sylaise the Hearthkeeper's path. I wonder if the codes are going to be addressed in the narrative with the Dalish Inquisitor.

 

Yes! Exactly that! I don't really know if it will be adressed or not, but I'm definitely looking forward to playing a Dalish Inquisitor of the second kind, since it would break the common (but not totally undeserved) stereotype about them.



#946
themageguy

themageguy
  • Members
  • 3 176 messages
Will we be a first or a recently initiated keeper who lost his clan???

#947
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Ever played any War hammer dawn of war game or know about the lore? In Imperium of man there is no other consequences for corruption at its tiniest bits, there is only death. The people policing the police are chosen with utmost care and have authority over everything else. If they decide someone is corrupted, they die. No questions asked no strings attached. That is why the corrupt can never stay in the society no matter how good they are in hiding. They will be found out and executed.

Wait... what? Corruption absolutely flourishes within the Imperium of Man, and for the powerful, ordinary corruption will generally just get you a slap on the wrist if the Arbites catch you, if anything. The Inquisition only gets involved with sedition, heresy and demons/aliens, and ordinary criminal activity is almost always beneath its notice.


  • Thunderfox aime ceci

#948
Lulupab

Lulupab
  • Members
  • 5 455 messages

Wait... what? Corruption absolutely flourishes within the Imperium of Man, and for the powerful, ordinary corruption will generally just get you a slap on the wrist if the Arbites catch you, if anything. The Inquisition only gets involved with sedition, heresy and demons/aliens, and ordinary criminal activity is almost always beneath its notice.

 

Not the leaders. No one cares about corruption of a common solider. Leaders on the other hand...



#949
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Not the leaders. No one cares about corruption of a common solider. Leaders on the other hand...

Leaders get away with all kinds of horrible things. Hive nobles are free to murder whomever they please from the lower classes, and frequently do so in amusing ways. One system has a civil war brewing over lack of space to store paperwork. Generals send millions to die unnecessarily and get medals for it. This kind of thing is very common.



#950
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages

Also because the templars often hunt the Dalish, so there is a connection. 

 

'Often'?

 

Everything I can recall the Dalish mentioning, including Merrill, is that they moved frequently to avoid such conflict. A Dalish tribe stays in the vicinity of a major Templar stronghold for seven years in DA2 and faces no such action.

 

'Occassional' would be warranted, but 'often'?