I am concerned about sampling bias since I'm in this thread, and on the BSN, but is there the notion that LGBTQ players are more likely supportive of the romances for this reason, and as such also find themselves having the most to lose if BioWare were to make a game that had no romances?
I agree that there might be some sampling bias here, but you might also be onto something. I think one of the reasons why the LGBT community is vocal about the romances in Bioware games is because (and I'm speaking for myself primarily, but hoping that it applies to others the way I think it does) this one of the few venues within the gaming industry that is inclusive and goes out of its way to allow us to have the same access to content in which our sexuality plays an important role. It's so refreshing and welcomed that I couldn't imagine ever turning my back on Bioware because of it. It really means that much to me.
I've been a gamer since the mid-80's when I bought an NES with my allowance money (although I actively played my parents Atari before that). I have always loved RPGs the most out of any genre. Ultima: Exodus on the NES was my first real RPG love and it was because of the variety of characters and classes. The first computer based game that I played was Baldur's Gate. I played BG, BG 2, and the Icewind Dale games out. It was in BG 2 that I got my first big disappointment when there were romances but I didn't have any to play. KOTOR is still one of my favorite games, but my Revan always stayed single. I head canoned it as "the Jedi way", but I really wanted to romance Carth. It wasn't until 2005 that I was finally able to romance a male as a male in an RPG and that was Sky in Jade Empire. It wasn't until 2011 that I got a choice in which guy to romance and that was in DA 2. Keep in mind that I've been playing video games for nearly 30 years at this point.
It's not that romance content is a deal breaker for me because it's not. Like I said before, I'm a lifelong Bioware customer because I feel so strongly about the support that the company has provided the LGBT community. It hasn't always been perfect, but it's been present for almost a decade and it continues to get better and better (more inclusive; better written). I would buy a Bioware game without romance, of course, but I would be disappointed because I think that it's unlikely that other gaming studios are going to rise up to fill that slot right away. For example, Spider Studios is about release a new RPG called Bound By Flame. It actually sounds alot like a Bioware RPG: customizable main character (male or female), a party of recruitable companions, story driven campaign, the ability to form friendships/rivalries/romances with companions, etc. However, the romances are hetero only. I actually wrote to Spider Games about my disappointment and received a very lovely response in which a representative indicated that it was the publisher who didn't want same-sex romance and that they were hoping to use emails like mine to convince them to add them into their next game. It's obvious to me that the rest of the industry just isn't at the same place as Bioware. They'll get there eventually, I'm sure, but in the meantime, Bioware games are my haven. They are the place where I can enjoy my favorite hobby and feel like my sexuality isn't an issue.
So to summarize my very long post: Would I buy a Bioware game without romance? Of course I would. Would I be disappointed that there were no romances? Yes, because unfortunately, there aren't many other studios willing to support us in that way. I hope that this message wasn't too long or too sappy.