Aller au contenu

Photo

Frostbite Engine


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
29 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Massa FX

Massa FX
  • Members
  • 1 930 messages
Given the latest DA:I trailer, I'm really excited for ME4. Can you imagine seeing new MEU world's with this engine? Or even previously seen worlds?

#2
Mes

Mes
  • Members
  • 1 975 messages

Man if they bring exploration back like ME1 but with these new capabilities, it will be mind blowing!


  • fchopin aime ceci

#3
Revan299s

Revan299s
  • Members
  • 95 messages

Agreed. Hmm. how would open-world work in a space-travel game. Would it even be able to work? lol



#4
SwobyJ

SwobyJ
  • Members
  • 7 375 messages

I don't think we'll have 'open world' so much.

 

But bigger hub areas? Totally.

 

Bigger battlefields? Absolutely.

 

More open areas without it being filled with more cut-and-paste assets and activities? Yep.

 

Space travel and even battle mechanics? Possibly... but I'm only crossing my fingers for this one.



#5
Massa FX

Massa FX
  • Members
  • 1 930 messages
Do we even know that ME4 will be another space opera? Nope.

Whatever it is, our play areas can be beautiful and immense. Imagine Feros without being constricted to certain areas. Or Illium... Noveria. The Citadel with all the wards accessible. Earth and Tuchanka and Palavan.

Huge worlds to explore with multiple cities we can travel to in a vehicle or not. Lol!

#6
Revan299s

Revan299s
  • Members
  • 95 messages

I don't think we'll have 'open world' so much.

 

But bigger hub areas? Totally.

 

Bigger battlefields? Absolutely.

 

More open areas without it being filled with more cut-and-paste assets and activities? Yep.

 

Space travel and even battle mechanics? Possibly... but I'm only crossing my fingers for this one.

I would prefer not to have space battles. I never liked any kind of space/flight sims.

 

Do we even know that ME4 will be another space opera? Nope.

Whatever it is, our play areas can be beautiful and immense. Imagine Feros without being constricted to certain areas. Or Illium... Noveria. The Citadel with all the wards accessible. Earth and Tuchanka and Palavan.

Huge worlds to explore with multiple cities we can travel to in a vehicle or not. Lol!

Space opera is what ME is at the core.

I agree about the areas to explore can be pretty awesome. And if the vehicles would be anything like the trilogy. I would prefer to do without them lol.



#7
SwobyJ

SwobyJ
  • Members
  • 7 375 messages

"space/flight sims"

 

I wasn't talking about that.



#8
Revan299s

Revan299s
  • Members
  • 95 messages

"space/flight sims"

 

I wasn't talking about that.

Not sure what you mean then. Can't see how you can have space travel mechanics outside of what they had already without it feeling like a flight sim mechanic.



#9
SwobyJ

SwobyJ
  • Members
  • 7 375 messages

Minigame with maybe some upgrading elements. I wouldn't call that anything like an actual flight sim.



#10
Guest_npc86_*

Guest_npc86_*
  • Guests

I don't think we'll have 'open world' so much.

 

But bigger hub areas? Totally.

 

Bigger battlefields? Absolutely.

 

More open areas without it being filled with more cut-and-paste assets and activities? Yep.

 

Space travel and even battle mechanics? Possibly... but I'm only crossing my fingers for this one.

 

The first three of those are what I'm expecting. Dragon Age: Inquisition isn't open-world like some people are thinking. It still has "areas" like the first two games except these areas and environments are now a lot bigger than before. I wouldn't mind ME1-style exploration being brought back if the planets and areas had the same variety that ME2's side missions had.



#11
Remix-General Aetius

Remix-General Aetius
  • Members
  • 2 215 messages

space battles are cool in theory, but I can't recall a single game so far that has pulled off even remotely acceptable ones. ME2 Hammerhead was pretty simple but I could always talk it. whereas the VTOL sequences in Crysis games.........god they sucked, and they're the most frustrating parts of the games.

 

planets with multiple cities/locations you could travel to by vehicle would be a very cool addition. wouldn't necessarily have to be 100% open world for that. remember the Prothean Skyway on Feros?

 

the possibilities are bountiful BUT the deciding factor is how much EA will influence ME4's development. if they're involved even less than they were in ME3, then you can kiss most of your ideas goodbye.

 

JUST ONCE I want to see a game developer studio produce a game without cutting anything out, and without restrictions. sure it would take longer than an average game to complete, but the results would be stellar.



#12
EatChildren

EatChildren
  • Members
  • 708 messages

Worth remembering that as good as Inquisition looked, it's also a cross generation game. Admittedly one of the better looking ones; BioWare's high end assets are very impressive. But still, the game as a whole has cross generation compatibility restrictions applied, and still manages to look as good as it does.

 

Mass Effect 4 is unlikely to be built with cross generation intentions, so from the very start the art, character, effects, and world design have a much higher technical ceiling. Despite using relatively constrained technology and hardware, the trilogy managed to look fantastic on UE3 iterations @360/PS3 hardware. With the ceiling raised considerably and a much more capable and modern engine powering it, Mass Effect 4 should look absolutely astounding.



#13
Nitrocuban

Nitrocuban
  • Members
  • 5 767 messages

I hope for more interactiv and dynamic maps, this "levolution" thing could be awesome in an ME game.



#14
von uber

von uber
  • Members
  • 5 526 messages
Maps the scale of arma 3 for example would be amazing. But also unachievable for any reasonable time scale and cost.

#15
von uber

von uber
  • Members
  • 5 526 messages
Actually just being able to fully utilise the power of a modern pc would be a nice start.

#16
HenkieDePost

HenkieDePost
  • Members
  • 178 messages

It would be logical for ME maps to be far more 'destructable' now that they are using Frostbite as their engine. Just like Battlefield, where they are very proud of the fact that you can blow almost everything up, I am thinking that the next mass effect maps will be way more dynamic than the older mass effect games. Cover which get's destroyed, interactive environments which could be destroyed, better and more detailed cinematics, these would be the things we will most likely see alot more now that ME is using frostbite.



#17
Dup3r

Dup3r
  • Members
  • 406 messages

Speaking of the FB engine.... this isn't going to be Windows 8 "required" is it?



#18
Nitrocuban

Nitrocuban
  • Members
  • 5 767 messages

First time I hear about that.

Has that something to do with Mantle?



#19
von uber

von uber
  • Members
  • 5 526 messages

Speaking of the FB engine.... this isn't going to be Windows 8 "required" is it?


I highly doubt it. Windows 8 is a pile of poo.

#20
SNascimento

SNascimento
  • Members
  • 6 002 messages

If ME1 style exploration of brought back to ME'4' the Frostbite Engine would means little since we would be mustly exploring a huge square of nothing.

I wouldn't be suprised to be bigger areas in ME'4' and more exploration then we saw in ME2 and ME3, but I believe it will/hope it will be thoughtful.



#21
Nitrocuban

Nitrocuban
  • Members
  • 5 767 messages

I highly doubt it. Windows 8 is a pile of poo.

 

Vista was worse and was mandatory for DX10.



#22
Guest_Rubios_*

Guest_Rubios_*
  • Guests

Speaking of the FB engine.... this isn't going to be Windows 8 "required" is it?

 

64bit Vista SP2+

 

I wouldn't expect DirectX 9 support.



#23
Fredvdp

Fredvdp
  • Members
  • 6 186 messages

Speaking of the FB engine.... this isn't going to be Windows 8 "required" is it?

 

More likely it will require 64-bit, but I doubt Windows 7 will be excluded.



#24
von uber

von uber
  • Members
  • 5 526 messages
Excluding windows 7 would be a ludicrously stupid decision.

#25
Revan299s

Revan299s
  • Members
  • 95 messages

Excluding windows 7 would be a ludicrously stupid decision.

I read somewhere that MS will stop supporting win7 soon. So I'd expect others to follow as well.