What exactly are you doing in this thread?
why isn't it obvious, we're talkin bout dragon age
I knew you had been using that term in a vaguely scornful manner 
A woman who gets saved by a dude isn't a bad character by default. Lois Lane for instance. She can't physically survive a 100 foot drop from a building but that doesn't mean she isn't well written, headstrong, intelligent, and interesting. A character who doesn't get saved by men and is often the savior is say, Wonder Woman. Both women are worth our time and interest, they just have different skill sets. It comes down to context and how they are written and utilized throughout the whole body of the work, not just in one scene. A female character can be interesting/feminist/well written in a variety of ways. Kinda like male characters.
well you knew wrong, because I used to sometimes consider myself a feminist. I was hating robin thicke before it was popular to hate robin thicke
.
When I said I'm glad I'm not a feminist, that's literally what I meant. Some say that anyone who supports equality at all is a feminist, and in that respect I guess I am. But I'm glad I'm not your brand of feminist, where anything even slightly below your expectation is written off as worthless, or the crazy men hating ones.
I never said someone who gets saved is a bad character. In fact I find the recent trend of "girl but she kicks butt" influx kinda boring, is there a girl who isn't physically good at fighting anymore? I specifically mentioned damsels in distress and eye candy characters which NOT well written by definition, which I was comparing to well written, but slightly less numerous, female characters.