A couple of different posts. Not a developed/organized project, but key elements are there.
===
I'm of two minds about conspiracies.
On one hand, I really don't like the ones that go into the 'all powerful Illuminati conspiracy' angle. Deus Ex, Mason conspiracies, basically anything that supposes that there's a huge, invisible alliance of forces that have perfect OPSEC and are either to perfectly prevent the truth from breaking out or prevent it from being believed... I think those conspiracies are stupid. At best, they're over-romantic and presume the masses are a monolithic block that can be easily predicted and manipulated by intent.
At worst, they become self-righteous Truther conspiracies where only an ennoble, awakened, and aware few tragic heroes are fighting to protect the stupid sheeple from their own pitiful delusions.
ON THE OTHER HAND...
A subtle, measured conspiracy can be totally worth it. If it's small, if it's specific, and if it's time-limited (ie, not an ageless group of masterminds), a cabal can totally work. Especially if the actors are limited, so that there aren't many arguments between competing interests, or if the conspiracy actually does break down internally.
I think my favorite sort of conspiracy story would deal from the Cold War alliances: not the Tom Clancy/James Bond spy stories, but the raising of allies and client states, and the covert agreements and penetrations that exist within them.
Take, for example, the FVEY alliance: Snowden talked about it during his leaks, about how the intelligence agencies of the USA, UK, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand are fingers in a single glove. By what the New York Times puts out, this is one of the most unappreciated intergovernmental alliances in history... and we barely know anything about it, past that it exists. We don't know how it came to be, who exactly created the rules for it, or how it's managed. Everyone thinks that it's just an intergovernmental relationship... but who really knows how it's directed? Who knows where the information shared really comes from?
And dude, what follows is totally, 100% made up by me.
This is the sort of context I could see a secretive cabal forming in. An alliance of interests and resources, and already inclined to keep secrets, and an alliance in which deniability is incredibly plausible. A curious reporter finds evidence of evidence from torture in a UK report? They got it from the Americans. A US congressional investigation wants to investigate the source of a report? Sorry, that came from one of the other partners.
It's the five men in a dark room murder mystery, only espionage. That would be compelling enough if there were only five men... but what if the dark room had a sixth?
Imagine if the twist was that the FVEY alliance had a cabal directing it: 'managers' appointed by the source nations with the purpose of directing it, and using the layers of deniability to create a sixth intelligence agency? The FVEY agency?
No one below the lowest levels knows it exists, maybe not even the employees: they think they're employees of the CIA/MI6/your choice, operating on behalf of their own nation. FVEY is a system, not a body... and while they know someone is pulling the strings, if they're a good employee they're not the kind to ask above their clearance. So they do their spy work, working in the FVEY system, and never realize that they've fallen off the books.
FVEY spy rings. FVEY spy satelites. FVEY Black Prisons. Shared and operated for the benefit of all... but owned by none. And when any part of it is found, it's passed off as belonging to one nation or the other as one of their secret facilities, with no one the wiser of the centralized cabal behind the scenes.
That's only half of it, though- the other half is the scary thought of penetration. It's been said that the Soviets ran the intelligence agencies of the Warsaw Pact, down to the leaders of the agencies. When a spy agency is that compromised, how can it ever be cleaned without being purged from the start? Even if the former foe has fallen?
Thing of this as the 'infection' cabal: a system of compromised agencies that are connected by one compromising another to the extent that they own each other. This could be done in the context of a centralized controller: the masterminds, the russians who have compromised the rest. Each agency reporting to a central node.
But the Russian state and agency could be gone. Fallen for whatever reasons, and then their own agencies compromised by their former foes. Reverse the flow of infection.
Now we can have a decentralized infection: A is compromised by B is compromised by C is compromised by A. Who started it is past and academic: what matters is that these agencies, through corruption rather than alliance, are feeding off of and supplying eachother in a different sort of network.
Imagine Adam Jensen searching for a mastermind that is working through all the intelligence agencies, only to find himself searching an Ouroboros loop? Or, better yet, finding that the ring, masterless, has taken a life of its own?
There's actually an anime, Darker than Black, that toys with this. In a world in which space has been lost, super-powered contractors serve as spies, and everyone is trying to figure out the paradigm-shifting advances behind these, it starts as a setting in which all the intelligence agencies are competing, along with a separate organization called the Syndicate. We learn that, in a secret but bloody war awhile ago, the USA lost its status as the superpower when the Syndicate rose to power. At multiple times in the series, we see the Syndicate and the CIA still fighting each other of artifacts and such.
We learn even later, in the first season finale, that the Syndicate isn't just fighting the CIA and other agencies... the Syndicate is composed of members in key positions. Spy chiefs of multiple agencies are Syndicate. As much as they fought eachother, the Syndicate grew from each victory and each defeat. Which brings the question... did they make the Syndicate, or did the Syndicate make them?
If the FVEY Cabal is a centralized conspiracy out of a decentralized alliance, the Syndicate could be a decentralized conspiracy born out of mutually compromised agencies.
How tripped out is that?





Retour en haut






