Aller au contenu

Photo

POSSIBLE Fresh Mass Effect Next Details


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
202 réponses à ce sujet

#1
N7 Shadow 90

N7 Shadow 90
  • Members
  • 1 428 messages

Source - http://www.rocketcha...s-effect-40991/
 
Before anybody gets too ahead of themselves, it should be noted that these should be treated as rumours for now, as the article states the following:
 
"Sources: Information comes from verified sources, people in a position to know. The information however has not been seen first hand personally by any member of Rocket Chainsaw. So even if we believe what we’ve been told, we cannot outright confirm its legitimacy.

Accuracy: Our sources stressed that the information passed on is based on an old prototype of the game. Our sources were unwilling to commit to the information being perfectly accurate at time of writing, and may have undergone changes that has made some of this information obsolete.

For both of these reasons we strongly encourage our readers to interpret this report as a rumour, at least until we can verify the information first hand for ourselves, or until the game is formally revealed
.
"
 
Below are the rumours that are stated in the article:
 
"1.Mass Effect 4 is not called “Mass Effect 4″, but Mass Effect: Subtitle. Representatives at BioWare have implied as much, but we’ve been told that indeed Montreal’s Mass Effect does not use the title Mass Effect 4. It is currently operating under a subtitle name, which intends to carry across to the commercial build. The subtitle will embody the game’s major themes.

 

2.Mass Effect 4 is third person. This might seem obvious, but we’ve included it more as an interesting titbit on the development process. BioWare has, in the past, experimented with different camera perspectives for all three of the mainline Mass Effect trilogy games, not always locking in “third person” from the very beginning. While they’ve too experimented with Mass Effect 4, the decision has been made to play in third person similarly to the original trilogy.

 

3.Multiplayer returns. A no brainer. We’ve been told that Mass Effect 3‘s multiplayer was a surprising success for EA, internal buzz very positive. Multiplayer is locked in to return for Mass Effect 4. We’re unable to verify if the mode has changed, or if it’s a similar co-op arena mode to Mass Effect 3.

 

4.Exploration is a major theme. Here’s a good one: Mass Effect 4 will focus on many things, but “exploration” is apparently the core focus of both the gameplay and the narrative. This is a core theme that is driving the overall design and direction of the new series at Montreal.

 

5.New races will appear. Yep, we’ve got confirmation that this game will not be restricted to the usual Human, Asari, Turian, and so on. Tied in with the prior point, Mass Effect 4 will introduce new species (multiple!) that play major roles in narrative and overall direction. Other species do return, though we’re unable to confirm if any have been removed or downscaled in significance.

 

6.Sequel to the trilogy is likely. Unfortunately our sources would not confirm exactly when Mass Effect 4 takes place in the canon. That being said, we were stressed that all signs point to this being a forward moving continuation of the franchise. As BioWare has said many times before, we’ve also been told that all things “Commander Shepard trilogy” will not be continued in this game; the trilogy is over, and this is something new. That being said, the implication is that this narrative is set canonically post-Mass Effect 3. What does this mean for the multiple endings? We don’t know. Oddly, we’ve been told that “flashback” like sequences to franchise/lore canonical events are not out of the question.

 

7.Nextgen focus. Some are worried that like Dragon Age: Inquisition Montreal’s Mass Effect 4 would be a cross generation title. This is untrue. At time of writing, Mass Effect 4 is being built on Frostbite 3 exclusively for Xbox One, PlayStation 4, and PC. This is being done in order for the core design to flourish on next generation hardware, and not be held back by previous generation limitations. While this does not rule out a rough last generation downport later on, we’ve been told there is currently no intention to do so. Mass Effect 4 is fully “nextgen”.

 

8.PAX leak unconfirmed, but likely. We couldn’t help ourselves. Talking with sources, we had to ask about the reputed PAX leak, which claimed Mass Effect 4 would feature a focus on exploring new worlds, two new species, deep customisation, and so on, was the words of a madman or a legitimate leak. Our sources were coy and refused to commit one way or the other, but did emphasise that the leak seemed “believable”. Take that however you wish."

 

I'll state once more what the article also states - These are nothing more than rumours as the information cannot be verified by the writer of the article.


  • Lyria, P. Domi, DEmon et 8 autres aiment ceci

#2
DeathNyx

DeathNyx
  • Members
  • 241 messages

The important is that the next ME won't be a mmorpg.


  • Lyria, FilthyPlebianN7 et Armali aiment ceci

#3
InterrogationBear

InterrogationBear
  • Members
  • 732 messages

The author is EatChildren, who is also a mod at neogaf and usually well informed. I think he knows people within EA.


  • Lyria aime ceci

#4
JeffZero

JeffZero
  • Members
  • 14 400 messages
Fascinatingly, this sounds precisely like what I'm hoping is the case. Heh.

Well, I don't care whether multiplayer returns on a personal level, but it'll help ensure good sales given how many people grew rather attached to it. So keep it coming.

I recognize the author, too; good sign. But grain of salt for now.
  • NM_Che56 aime ceci

#5
Drone223

Drone223
  • Members
  • 6 663 messages

Some of that stuff is already known i.e. main character won't be Shepard, won't be a direct sequel to the trilogy, as for the rest of the stuff I would take it with a grain of salt and wait for an official announcement.



#6
Malanek

Malanek
  • Members
  • 7 838 messages

On one hand, I hope everything in here is true, on the other hand it is just extremely basic information and things we have heard before with nothing at all surprising. Who knows whether it is true or not but it sounds suspiciously like what someone would come up with if they were taking an educated guess. There is nothing here that someone couldn't guess at easily. If the source is someone withing EA but outside Bioware I guess this is the kind of information they would have.


  • Dubozz aime ceci

#7
Nitrocuban

Nitrocuban
  • Members
  • 5 767 messages

The only thing that is really new is "exploration's gonna be a big thing".

Sounds nice but not really mindblowing news.



#8
Malanek

Malanek
  • Members
  • 7 838 messages

We've heard about the exploration aspect from unofficial rumors before.



#9
Lawrence0294

Lawrence0294
  • Members
  • 2 825 messages

Sounds quite legitimate.

If true, then good, very good.

 

The one thing that buggles me is if it is indeed a sequel, how on earth will they take in consideration the different endings (cannonizing one would be suicidal imo)



#10
Han Shot First

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 213 messages

Interesting.

 

If this information is legit and the focus is on exploration, with multiple new species being introduced, I wonder if the game is going to be similar to Star Trek: Voyager as far as the plot goes.


  • Jaulen aime ceci

#11
JeffZero

JeffZero
  • Members
  • 14 400 messages
A ship on the fringes attempting to return to its origin? Yeah, I would dig.
  • Johanna aime ceci

#12
Animositisomina

Animositisomina
  • Members
  • 2 699 messages

I don't mind if multiplayer does return, so long as it has no impact on the player's success in the singleplayer campaign.


  • Han Shot First et zetti aiment ceci

#13
SwobyJ

SwobyJ
  • Members
  • 7 375 messages

"Oddly, we’ve been told that “flashback” like sequences to franchise/lore canonical events are not out of the question."

 

Not odd. This is very, very fitting.

 

Everything is going to plan... *clasps hands together*

 

Very interesting.

 

To anyone saying "Leave Shepard/the trilogy alone!", I urge you to investigate the existing series more. There may be very good reasons for 'flashbacks', even with Shepard's Trilogy over and the next story not necessarily related to it.



#14
Kingthlayer

Kingthlayer
  • Members
  • 1 542 messages

Most of that seems pretty obvious.  The one that has me concerned is that new species will play a major role.  One thing that has always bothered me about Mass Effect is how important humans have become in only a fraction of the time of other species.  But I can get that, people want to play human characters and they want to be important. 

 

But new races popping up out of nowhere and being major players in the galaxy?  That has horrible writing written all over it.  One of the things I'm looking forward to the next Mass Effect is seeing how a galaxy that has been almost completely destroyed rebuilds itself, I don't want to see some random race come in and be like "lol we in power now bro"


  • Animositisomina et Armali aiment ceci

#15
JeffZero

JeffZero
  • Members
  • 14 400 messages
1. So little of the galaxy has been explored, though. Species without access to Mass Relays could still be incredibly powerful.

2. The story could involve a ship "boldly going" far, far away from what is currently known.

Either instance (or indeed both intertwined) may not touch upon your personal pick for most intriguing element, but could still stand to tell interesting new stories in their own right.

In any case, the galaxy looked relatively OK on my file.

#16
Ajensis

Ajensis
  • Members
  • 1 200 messages

Thanks for sharing!

 

4.Exploration is a major theme. Here’s a good one: Mass Effect 4 will focus on many things, but “exploration” is apparently the core focus of both the gameplay and the narrative. This is a core theme that is driving the overall design and direction of the new series at Montreal.

 

Hmm. While I heartily welcome a return to exploration, I'm now beginning to wonder if I would like a narrative focus on it. Maybe the world in ME1 seemed so much bigger because exploring those worlds were optional? They were available if you should wish to engage in visiting them, but not necessary for the story.

On the other hand, I can understand the idea of wanting to make the most of what you build. Creating a dozen different worlds that many players might not even want to travel to could make it tempting to view it as 'wasted time'. But I think it would be worth it if it means the game world comes alive and has that incredibly-sized feel to it.

But as I said, I'm not sure if I really feel that way. We'll have to wait and see.

 

All in all, great things ahead if this turns out to be true :) gosh, I can't wait to hear more.


  • DigitalMaster37 aime ceci

#17
JeffZero

JeffZero
  • Members
  • 14 400 messages
Exploration and space opera go hand in hand in my head; always have, since Captain Picard took the reins of the Enterprise-D a couple of weeks after I was born. :P (Feels weird that I've had two reasons to mention that in a week, but hey.)

Point is, I think it'll be sterling, provided the writers have the chops to make it so of course. But then, if anything I wouldn't have minded more reason to go to all those worlds in ME1. The skyboxes are glorious six-and-a-half years later but knowing what lay ahead is always one of three cookie cutter layouts with -- ooh, this door wasn't locked last time! -- basically identical experiences does grow rather tiring.

Better, IMO, to follow Inquisition's attempted model of massive environments compelling the player to traverse them, rich with Frostbite-enabled detail and unique content around as many corners as possible. Better to compel directly and provide sincerely than to offer optionally and merely suggest greatness.
  • ShaggyWolf et SwobyJ aiment ceci

#18
Malanek

Malanek
  • Members
  • 7 838 messages

Most of that seems pretty obvious.  The one that has me concerned is that new species will play a major role.  One thing that has always bothered me about Mass Effect is how important humans have become in only a fraction of the time of other species.  But I can get that, people want to play human characters and they want to be important. 

 

But new races popping up out of nowhere and being major players in the galaxy?  That has horrible writing written all over it.  One of the things I'm looking forward to the next Mass Effect is seeing how a galaxy that has been almost completely destroyed rebuilds itself, I don't want to see some random race come in and be like "lol we in power now bro"

 

I have always wondered what civilisation actually designed the crucible. I wouldn't mind the scenario in which they designed it but didn't have the resources to build it given their own impending doom. So instead they try and use future cycles to finish their work while they wait in hiding, waiting for the right moment to swoop in and reclaim their "rightful" place.

 

But there are tonnes of other options, especially with less advanced species. There is still plenty of established aspects to explore but I feel the writers should definitely also be looking to introduce new material.



#19
Ajensis

Ajensis
  • Members
  • 1 200 messages

@Jeff0:

 

Oh, I'm certainly not saying I want the exact same uncharted worlds of ME1. The buildings and underground caverns were definitely a bit too unvaried :) all I'm getting at is that having some optional exploration alongside the exploration you undertake during the main quest line could help a lot in making the world seem bigger. After all, we visited some wonderful worlds in ME3 too, but it was all gone in a flash and tied to a hyper-tempo plot line. I think I'd like something more akin to the first game.

 

Also, the desertedness of ME1's uncharted worlds was wonderful. Of course, there were usually someone or something to be found on each one, but you still had to drive for a while to get to them. If the uncharted worlds become tied to the main story, there'll be persons or objects of huge importance and that will alter the experience a great deal.

Also also, how did you feel about so many familiar faces popping up in ME2 and ME3 in different circumstances? I can appreciate that it was meant as a send-away to the many characters we've met throughout the trilogy, but ultimately it made the world smaller when we kept running into the same people in such a vast galaxy of people. It's somewhat related, perhaps, to what I'm getting at here.

Or maybe it's not and my tired brain is long overdue some sleep :P I'll know in 8 hours, I suspect!


  • JeffZero aime ceci

#20
JeffZero

JeffZero
  • Members
  • 14 400 messages
No, no, I think that was a great post and a great point. I know as much as I love ME3 and appreciate that it had to be "hyper-tempo" to respect its place in the arcs the previous games had built toward I look forward to a return to something a good bit more patient with the world around it. :)
  • Helios969 aime ceci

#21
shepskisaac

shepskisaac
  • Members
  • 16 374 messages

The author is EatChildren, who is also a mod at neogaf and usually well informed. I think he knows people within EA.

Yep, this is likely reliable information



#22
B.Shep

B.Shep
  • Members
  • 1 876 messages

Grain of salt but yeah it's posible this is really reliable info.

Everything said in the article was kinda expected  if we take into account the "PAX leak". Still is always nice to see things related to ME. :P



#23
Han Shot First

Han Shot First
  • Members
  • 21 213 messages

Mass Effect: Andromeda has a nice ring to it.

 

Of course with only 1% of the Milky Way explored as of ME3, maybe its a bit too soon to jump into a different galaxy? It would provide a cool title though.



#24
JeffZero

JeffZero
  • Members
  • 14 400 messages
I'd like something synonymous with "Unlimited" myself.

Absolution
Boundless
Limitless
...Illimitable :P

#25
shepskisaac

shepskisaac
  • Members
  • 16 374 messages

Nothing that ends with '-ion' please, we've had way too much of these subtitles in ME already