That sounds like a terrible idea. Then who actually enforces the law who can guarantee there won't be favoritism taken in problems between mages. Or are we to pretend that mages are better then normal people and won't have petty issues and grievances that will turn ugly if not addressed quickly? How long until mages begin using their masters as symbols of status to lord over the other apprentices with? And what happens when two fraternities begin getting into issues with one another? Are they expected just to sort things out on their own, as if that won't cause problems. We had that with uldred when he tried to push the libertarian movement forward along with his own political ideology and tried to exterminate the other fraternities in the circle so he would go unchallenged.
Just listen to what you're saying lol. How did presence of templars affected any of that in any way? Uldred did it anyway and Templars were defeated almost immediately and had to wait for reinforcements. Templars couldn't do anything, locked the tower up and waited for reinforcements. Nothing would have changed if the circle was autonomous at that time. The Templars wont be kicked out of circle, there will be patrols but unless something is amiss they have no authority over mages, just like the police who patrol our cities, they can be suspicious, but the people are ruled by a government they have chosen.





Retour en haut






