The tranquil, despite popular belief, are individuals who have had their emotional centers relegated due to their connection to the fade being severed. They can think and act for themselves and even can refuse to obey orders or requests if they feel it is illogical for them to follow those orders. A knight commander couldn't order a tranquil to walk into the ocean and drown because the tranquil would simply refuse to follow that command to lead itself to its own death. Now, they think using only logic and reasoning, with a possible tiny amount of emotion tinting but not dictating their thoughts, though nothing on that has been confirmed and it doesn't actually pertain to the question at hand.
Is it possible that we will seen tranquil supporting both sides of the war, who have simply drawn different logical conclusions on who to support. The mage supportive tranquil could reason that, because the mages have declared independence, that it is likely tensions will be high against all those associated with mages, including the tranquil. And that in order to ensure their own safety, they have to travel with those who are less likely to react negatively to them, those being the mages.
The templar supportive tranquils could have come to a different conclusion, rationalizing that because of the way the mages issued their declaration of independence, the templars would be looking to kill any mages who were prone to fighting them. A better survival tactic for the tranquil might be to submit to the current templar regime as to prove their worth and give reason not to be killed. Again, doing what is needed in order to survive.
I also wonder if there are tranquil on both sides we may end up with a mission in which we must solve a debate between two tranquils on which side has a more valid reason to join. It would be funny to see two tranquils going into a philosophical debate on which survival strategies are more grounded in logic and reason.





Retour en haut






