Aller au contenu

Photo

Blackwall Discussion Thread -- The Resolve! [Voiced by Alastair Parker]


14909 réponses à ce sujet

#1976
Brian ofthe Dialogue Wheel

Brian ofthe Dialogue Wheel
  • Members
  • 967 messages

I agree- in so much that honor is a subjective thing, different standards might find him honorable. In so much that honor is a concept of upholding duties and obligations, the standards of which integrity is judged by... well, we'll see. Certainly the Wardens have no honor-requirement to protect others regardless of the cost.

 

Technically the Wardens aren't even bound to defend the people from the Darkspawn: they are a sword to strike the Darkspawn, not a shield to protect people from the Darkspawn without any other consideration.

Well, if they don't save at least SOME people, the Grey Wardens serve no purpose- they're not required to lose the farm to save a few sheep, that much is true, but somebody HAS to survive.



#1977
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages

I agree- in so much that honor is a subjective thing, different standards might find him honorable. In so much that honor is a concept of upholding duties and obligations, the standards of which integrity is judged by... well, we'll see. Certainly the Wardens have no honor-requirement to protect others regardless of the cost.

 

Technically the Wardens aren't even bound to defend the people from the Darkspawn: they are a sword to strike the Darkspawn, not a shield to protect people from the Darkspawn without any other consideration.

The entire purpose of the Wardens is specifically to protect others. They are a reactionary force.



#1978
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages

Well, if they don't save at least SOME people, the Grey Wardens serve no purpose- they're not required to lose the farm to save a few sheep, that much is true, but somebody HAS to survive.

 

Someone has to survive, but it's not the role of the Grey Wardens to ensure that. It's the conceptual difference between a sword and a shield. A sword helps people survive by killing the enemy. But a sword is not a shield, and treating it like one to block every blow will see it break.

 

The role and importance of the Wardens isn't to be the shield to protect people: the Wardens are too few in number and their exceptional talents wasted in such a position. The role of the Wardens is to be the small, elite force that can get to the ArchDemon and kill it- protecting cities and towns and people from the Darkspawn until that point is the role of someone else.

 

If the Grey Wardens existed to defend the people, they wouldn't undergo the joining as a matter of course (and thus waste resources) nor would they limit their services as they do. The Grey Wardens exist to kill Darkspawn, which has the fortunate consequence of saving people the Darkspawn might otherwise kill.



#1979
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages

The entire purpose of the Wardens is specifically to protect others. They are a reactionary force.

 

Incorrect. The entire purpose of the Wardens is specifically to kill Archdemons. They are a standby force to confront Blights, not public security.


  • Shadow of Light Dragon, mlgumm et Paradigm of Memories aiment ceci

#1980
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages

Incorrect. The entire purpose of the Wardens is specifically to kill Archdemons. They are a reactionary force to Blights, not public security.

And WHY do they kill Archdemons? To protect the world. Ergo to protect others.

 

They don't fight the Darkspawn "just because". They are protectors..

 

Hell even the Grey Wardens themselves call themselves protectors/guardians....



#1981
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages

And WHY do they kill Archdemons? To protect the world. Ergo to protect others.

 

They don't fight the Darkspawn "just because". They are protectors..

 

Hell even the Grey Wardens themselves call themselves protectors/guardians....

 

I'd quote Mordin Solus here, but I don't think you grasp the distinction between the different ways to help people.



#1982
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages

I'd quote Mordin Solus here, but I don't think you grasp the distinction between the different ways to help people.

And you seem to have a conceptual misunderstanding of exactly what it means to protect.



#1983
Rinji the Bearded

Rinji the Bearded
  • Members
  • 3 613 messages

So...

Sera - Wildcard

Iron Bull - Muscules

Blackwall - Brains

Vivienne - Looks

Or was it just teasing? :)

 

You see them as you want to see them. In the simplest terms with the most convienient definitions. But what we will find out is that each of them is a protagonist, the resolve, a wild card, the ambition, and the muscle. 

 
Does that answer your question?
 
Sincerely, the Inquisition
 
4VJoYqi.png

  • Sheryl Chee, TanithAeyrs, Ashelsu et 3 autres aiment ceci

#1984
Joe25

Joe25
  • Members
  • 2 947 messages

 

You see them as you want to see them. In the simplest terms with the most convienient definitions. But what we will find out is that each of them is a protagonist, the resolve, a wild card, the ambition, and the muscle. 

 
Does that answer your question?
 
Sincerely, the Inquisition
 
4VJoYqi.png

 


  • TanithAeyrs, Rinji the Bearded, DragonRacer et 1 autre aiment ceci

#1985
Wolfen09

Wolfen09
  • Members
  • 2 913 messages

really, a breakfast club reference....  how low this thread has fallen



#1986
Dean_the_Young

Dean_the_Young
  • Members
  • 20 676 messages

And you seem to have a conceptual misunderstanding of exactly what it means to protect.

 

If 'misunderstanding' you mean 'avoid mission creep'... sure. That's what professionals do. You go to your police to protect you from criminals, and you go to your soldiers to protect you from your enemies, but you don't ask your soldiers to be police and you don't expect your police to defend you from soldiers and you certainly don't expect your elite soldiers to be defense rather than offense.

 

Well, not if you're not being sensible, at least. There are those who occasionally do, but it rarely works out well.



#1987
Wolfen09

Wolfen09
  • Members
  • 2 913 messages

You go to your police to protect you from criminals

 

not in detroit, oakland, or my native south dallas



#1988
Joe25

Joe25
  • Members
  • 2 947 messages

really, a breakfast club reference....  how low this thread has fallen

Oh, it could get lower. The next time the topic turns to the sad HIV/cancer death we call the Calling I'm going to play Season Of Love from Rent.  



#1989
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages

If 'misunderstanding' you mean 'avoid mission creep'... sure. That's what professionals do. You go to your police to protect you from criminals, and you go to your soldiers to protect you from your enemies, but you don't ask your soldiers to be police and you don't expect your police to defend you from soldiers and you certainly don't expect your elite soldiers to be defense rather than offense.

 

Well, not if you're not being sensible, at least. There are those who occasionally do, but it rarely works out well.

Yes you do. Yes you do. And yes you do. It all depends on the circumstances of course, but ALL the examples you mentioned are expected from them from time to time.

Police can be (or in some cases always are) part of a nation's armed forces, so if a nation were to be invaded police COULD be called in (and probably would in most situations).

Soldiers are already quite often called out to do police work all over the world. Again dependening on the situation at hand.

And Elite Soldiers in particular are often used in defensive actions. Frontline grunt work? No. But that is not the only way to use a unit defensively.

 

Also, since apparently this is a hard concept to grasp, going on the offense does NOT mean you aren't doing it to protect someone or something.

 

And no matter how you slice and dice it, Grey Wardens kill Archdemons for ONE singular purpose. To PROTECT the world. End of story.



#1990
Hellion Rex

Hellion Rex
  • Members
  • 30 037 messages

New Art by the Queen

 

Spoiler

  • aluanira, Rel Fexive, Ashelsu et 6 autres aiment ceci

#1991
thats1evildude

thats1evildude
  • Members
  • 11 007 messages

New Art by the Queen

Spoiler


Sooner or later, every Warden ventures into the Deep Roads.
  • HMM, Karm et LadyMacTir aiment ceci

#1992
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

The entire purpose of the Wardens is specifically to protect others. They are a reactionary force.

 

The purpose of the Wardens is to stop the blight. That obviously protects others, but actually protecting individuals, groups, or even nations is a secondary goal when the chips are down compared to stopping the blight. 



#1993
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages

The purpose of the Wardens is to stop the blight. That obviously protects others, but actually protecting individuals, groups, or even nations is a secondary goal when the chips are down compared to stopping the blight. 

Not at all. The Grey Wardens just know that they will save (read: protect) a whole lot more people by ending the Blights, than they will by protecting that one village. It is a numbers game.



#1994
Reaverwind

Reaverwind
  • Members
  • 1 724 messages

Sooner or later, every Warden ventures into the Deep Roads.

 

*groan*  :P



#1995
In Exile

In Exile
  • Members
  • 28 738 messages

Not at all. The Grey Wardens just know that they will save (read: protect) a whole lot more people by ending the Blights, than they will by protecting that one village. It is a numbers game.

 

Protection isn't an abstract utilitarian concept. It's not about saving hypothetical future lives. If you're in the business of letting people die because you think it'll save lives in the long-run, you're arguably a hero, but you're certainly not a protector. 

 

On your logic, using the bomb in WWII was just about protecting people. That's just not the right use of that concept. 



#1996
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages

Protection isn't an abstract utilitarian concept. It's not about saving hypothetical future lives. If you're in the business of letting people die because you think it'll save lives in the long-run, you're arguably a hero, but you're certainly not a protector. 

 

On your logic, using the bomb in WWII was just about protecting people. That's just not the right use of that concept. 

Of course it was about protecting people. The entire war was about protecting your nation. The US chose to use the bomb because they calculated that it would end up costing fewer lives, than an invation of mainland Japan would.

The Grey Warden protects the entire world by not being distracted by the few. And it isn't soemthing the Grey Wardens "think". They KNOW they will save more lives by ending the Blight sooner, rather than later. Ironically what the Grey Wardens certainly AREN'T is heroes. Heroes do not leave anyone to die.



#1997
Shadow of Light Dragon

Shadow of Light Dragon
  • Members
  • 5 179 messages

Grey Wardens consider it acceptable to put a village to the torch and its people to the sword if the Taint has taken root there.

 

That 'protects' the greater world, but pity the innocent who died and weren't even infected.



#1998
Hanako Ikezawa

Hanako Ikezawa
  • Members
  • 29 692 messages

Of course it was about protecting people. The entire war was about protecting your nation. The US chose to use the bomb because they calculated that it would end up costing fewer lives, than an invation of mainland Japan would.

The Grey Warden protects the entire world by not being distracted by the few. And it isn't soemthing the Grey Wardens "think". They KNOW they will save more lives by ending the Blight sooner, rather than later. Ironically what the Grey Wardens certainly AREN'T is heroes. Heroes do not leave anyone to die.

Ah, ruthless calculus. 


  • Han Shot First aime ceci

#1999
EmperorSahlertz

EmperorSahlertz
  • Members
  • 8 809 messages

Grey Wardens consider it acceptable to put a village to the torch and its people to the sword if the Taint has taken root there.

 

That 'protects' the greater world, but pity the innocent who died and weren't even infected.

Indeed. Grey Wardens aren't heroes. They don't pretend to be either.



#2000
Rinji the Bearded

Rinji the Bearded
  • Members
  • 3 613 messages

really, a breakfast club reference....  how low this thread has fallen

 

a breakfast club reference is pretty normal compared to my post talking about the taste of old man taint