But were those claims of biphobia (as the article contends), or is that a separate issue (as I noted, there are multiple reasons people advocate for the approach used in DA2, and some people just had their hearts set on romancing Dorian with their preferred gender)?But if we can criticize the wording of BioWare and the combined actions of BioWare and BioWare down to word choice regardless of apology, then we can also be skeptical of what the people who are being critical are saying. A lot of it did in fact have to do with characters being gay and not bisexual. Which is a bit problematic too.
I can understand people being disappointed and wanting Dorian to be bisexual. I can understand people preferring to have the romances all be bisexual (as it gives everyone equal access to all the content, regardless of the player character's gender). I wouldn't understand people positing that having Dorian gay (and a mix of sexualities in general) somehow constitutes erasure of bisexuality, but I have yet to see anybody seriously try to make such claims (I don't doubt it's happened somewhere, but I can't imagine it exists to the scale that the article seems intended to refute).
People can argue that the piecemeal revelation of romances and availability isn't necessarily fair or inclusive (I would have less sympathy for these arguments, but I can understand them as somebody who typically only warrants cursory mention, if we even get included at all), but that doesn't seem to be on point for the article either.
It's been surprising and disheartening to see all the media reports of "gay Dorian"—especially when there has been no coverage whatsoever of any of the other character reveals.I grabbed this from the Twitter thread. I haven't seen it in here yet, but I felt it was relevant to the general topic:
I don't even bother reading the comments to those stories; I know what will be found there.





Retour en haut







