First of all, let me say I love your username.There was an editorial about it posted a few pages back.
Personally, I don't find it anymore progressive to ignore every queer character's sexuality than it's progressive to make every queer character revolve around their sexuality. There's been ten queer love interests in Dragon Age so far. Nine of those make it a complete non-issue. I think it's great to have a character who's sexuality is important, especially when it fits within the context of the narrative and when it's not the sole defining characteristic. Because sexuality is important. It's important to me and it's important to Dorian. It's part of what made me who I am and part of what made Dorian who he is. Demanding that every queer character approach it identically and nonchalantly is reductive, especially when that's already in place as the rule rather than the exception.
I'll respectfully disagree with you. I see my own sexuality as a very small detail of myself and I think if more people saw it as only that, there'd certainly be less hate and prejudice. I'm on my second playthrough and now rethinking how I feel about Dorian and the ither characters. I really wanted to like Dorian because since I never liked anything about IB (rethinking that too though), Dorian would be my only choice if I wanted to play as a gay guy like I am irl. So cause he was handsome and had other interesting features I just ran with it but after actually playing the game I realized his personality didn't attract me much and his story was very different from what I expected. It's ok. Not something that appeals to me, but ok. Just happy they ran with this type of story now so they can try something new with the next gay male LI. :3 I'd like someone closer to Sera to whom it seems being gay matters not at all.
Sorry to bring negativity into the thread.





Retour en haut






















