ME1 was the worst in the series.
But did a change in tone happen? Only a bit. The overall tone in the narrative was certainly kept constant across the trilogy.
Reaper tech(or bad plot)
#76
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:22
#77
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:23
Transmitting voice recordings to all the geth in real time is even worse. All that bandwidth and storage space for no purpose. Even if it had been orders rather than an irrelevant conversation, it would have been text rather than voice.
As for Sovereign's plan, he's looking for the Conduit to get agents onto the Citadel. But he already has agents on the Citadel; highly-placed agents, in fact. And there's no shortage of armed krogan or asari on the Citadel, so there's no conceptual problem with reinforcing them even if Saren can't find a way to smuggle geth there. I'll grant that he only has Saren and Benezia's cover blown through preposterously bad luck, but why is he bothering?
Yeah, he could have used more agents, I agree on these. And Tali's recording was pretty derpy. Still, you could have workarounds to these bits. Indoctrination taking more time than expected, more solid evidence for Tali (which wouldn't have been hard to implement, really).
I was a kid when I played ME1, my idea of "realistic" was probably more flexible at the time, but Shepard at least showed some degree of intelligence, and there was way less cheese.
#78
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:31
As for Sovereign's plan, he's looking for the Conduit to get agents onto the Citadel. But he already has agents on the Citadel; highly-placed agents, in fact. And there's no shortage of armed krogan or asari on the Citadel, so there's no conceptual problem with reinforcing them even if Saren can't find a way to smuggle geth there. I'll grant that he only has Saren and Benezia's cover blown through preposterously bad luck, but why is he bothering?
My assumption has always been that Sovereign has been as much in the dark about the Conduit as Shepard was. That's why Saren is hunting down beacons: they're trying to figure out what's up with the Citadel.
By the time they figured out the problem lay with the Keepers, Saren has already been revealed as a traitor and they needed the Conduit to get him back.
#79
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:36
Hair up, hair down. What's the issue, again?
Hair down in combat=really bad for vision.
Plus there's the miniskirt/thigh high boots uniform thing. And the "shoot here please" v-neck? Why couldn't she wear a standard Alliance uniform again?
Plus the art book explicitly states Ash's makeover was to give her "sex appeal"
#80
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:39
There certainly seems to be a pathological hatred of authors and creators intending to make characters sexually appealing in fiction.
I assume that most people therefore think it happens by itself? That's about the only explanation I can think of.
That way the can have their cake and eat it too. Enjoy attractive characters, but never have to think too hard about where it came from and what their enjoyment means.
#81
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:43
There certainly seems to be a pathological hatred of authors and creators intending to make characters sexually appealing in fiction.
I assume that most people therefore think it happens by itself? That's about the only explanation I can think of.
That way the can have their cake and eat it too. Enjoy attractive characters, but never have to think too hard about where it came from and what their enjoyment means.
Not really, it's just ridiculous. You don't have to be half naked to look attractive, and you certainly don't need to do that in a battlefield.
#82
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:44
Yes, I would agree with that. This reaction does seem to be very ridiculous.
#83
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:44
Hardly. There's a time and a place for it. Running around a rubble-strewn warzone getting shot at isn't one of them.There certainly seems to be a pathological hatred of authors and creators intending to make characters sexually appealing in fiction.
I assume that most people therefore think it happens by itself? That's about the only explanation I can think of.
That way the can have their cake and eat it too. Enjoy attractive characters, but never have to think too hard about where it came from and what their enjoyment means.
- naddaya et Invisible Man aiment ceci
#84
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:46
Hair down in combat=really bad for vision.
Plus there's the miniskirt/thigh high boots uniform thing. And the "shoot here please" v-neck? Why couldn't she wear a standard Alliance uniform again?
Plus the art book explicitly states Ash's makeover was to give her "sex appeal"
I can vouch for that. I'm looking in the artbook right now. It says exactly that.
- naddaya et Invisible Man aiment ceci
#85
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:47
Yes, I would agree with that. This reaction does seem to be very ridiculous.
Boobs.
#86
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:50
While we're picking at this scab again, let's add another one. Why are we fighting this war with mere 21st century weapons? You'd think we'd have something a bit more advanced by the end of the 22nd Century especially if that Mars Archive jumped us 10,000 years into the future, wouldn't you? Oh that's right! The 10,000 year jump gave us kinetic barriers!
I figured part of the 10,000 year jump is an innoculation against all types of cancer so smoking is allowed again.
#87
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:50
Hardly. There's a time and a place for it. Running around a rubble-strewn warzone getting shot at isn't one of them.
Or having it be so for the sake of it being so. It makes sense for someone like Miranda. It doesn't make sense for every single female in the galaxy (or at least the Normandy) to get a breast job. It's forced over-sexualization. It really doesn't need to be that way. It shows where the developers focus is at for the characters. And it's not pretty.
- AlanC9 et Invisible Man aiment ceci
#88
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:51
Yes, I would agree with that. This reaction does seem to be very ridiculous.
Indeed. Your reaction to everything is ridiculous.
- KiriKaeshi aime ceci
#89
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:52
- naddaya et KiriKaeshi aiment ceci
#90
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:52
While we're picking at this scab again, let's add another one. Why are we fighting this war with mere 21st century weapons? You'd think we'd have something a bit more advanced by the end of the 22nd Century especially if that Mars Archive jumped us 10,000 years into the future, wouldn't you?
Such as what?
#91
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:53
I suppose this isn't sexy enough for David:

The redhead is really cute. I guarantee she's an officer. Fine by me though, I'm one too.
Oh well, she probably has about 30 tattoos. And she's probably in a really chill-yet-high-speed Branch like Aviation or Intel. Maybe MP.
- DeinonSlayer et Star fury aiment ceci
#92
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:54
I like.I suppose this isn't sexy enough for David:
#93
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:54
Such as what?
Use your f****** sci-fi imagination! Be a f****** writer!
#94
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 04:59
High speed bits of metal are about as effective as randomizing areas of body tissue as any small scale technology I can think of.
- KiriKaeshi aime ceci
#95
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 05:01
Use your f****** sci-fi imagination! Be a f****** writer!
Never underestimate the power of scoffing and self-assured supremacy in the face of challenge and skepticism.
- sH0tgUn jUliA, Star fury et Invisible Man aiment ceci
#96
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 05:03
#97
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 05:04
Railguns, Gauss guns, and mass accelerators are all pretty much the same thing.
#98
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 05:05
The railgun thing from Unreal tournament.
we have these things now in testing.
So Bob, why don't you come up with something or don't you have an imagination? I have plenty ideas you could scoff.
#99
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 05:05
Hair down in combat=really bad for vision.
Presumably rubber bands still exist in the MEU. Sure, she still has her hair down if the player has her helmet toggled off, but a player who toggles her helmet off doesn't care about such issues in the first place.
#100
Posté 18 mars 2014 - 05:09
I
The redhead is really cute. I guarantee she's an officer.
Presumably that guarantee isn't based on the cuteness.





Retour en haut





