Aller au contenu

Photo

Ultimate pro-human trilogy playthrough


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
146 réponses à ce sujet

#101
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

Well the Asari government. The same thing could be said of the Alliance but that wouldn't damn humanity would it?

I still say we should have had the option to chew out Tevos (before the usual suspects start in on me, that's a repudiation of her government, not the species). If you save the Spectre instead of Kahje, Shepard's (autodialogue) attitude regarding the Hanar extinction is... less than charitable. As I've noted, you can shoot Mordin, lie to Wrex's face about it, shoot Wrex and lie to C-Sec about it. One of the dialogue options reacting to the Quarian extinction is "they were stupid." Shepard can kill tens of millions and spit on their graves (I'd have liked to see more blowback for doing it, but that's another issue). So why exactly do the Asari get a free pass?

Shepard: "In case you haven't noticed, Joker, we just lost a few million people. This isn't the time!"
Joker: "Uh... really, Commander? You want to go there?"
  • themikefest et Anubis722 aiment ceci

#102
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

@Massively
Evolution selects traits. In humans, so far it has selected for morality and cooperation. One can claim any manner of behavior as right, but only time will tell if that behavior is selected by evolution.

I really don't see why evolution would select a needlessly confrontational worldview that you are espousing. It just seems counterproductive.

 

I didn't know evolution selected morality (hint hint; it didn't). I thought those were abstract concepts that grew out of philosophical understanding of justice stemming from a desire to be happy.

 

And again, you're ascribing what you want to see on my worldview. That's not what it is. Don't say that it's something that its not.


  • Hello!I'mTheDoctor aime ceci

#103
ImaginaryMatter

ImaginaryMatter
  • Members
  • 4 163 messages

I still say we should have had the option to chew out Tevos (before the usual suspects start in on me, that's a repudiation of her government, not the species). If you save the Spectre instead of Kahje, Shepard's (autodialogue) attitude regarding the Hanar extinction is... less than charitable. As I've noted, you can shoot Mordin, lie to Wrex's face about it, shoot Wrex and lie to C-Sec about it. One of the dialogue options reacting to the Quarian extinction is "they were stupid." Shepard can kill millions and spit on their graves (I'd have liked to see more blowback for doing it, but that's another issue). So why exactly do the Asari get a free pass?

Shepard: "In case you haven't noticed, Joker, we just lost a few million people. This isn't the time!"
Joker: "Uh... really, Commander? You want to go there?"

 

I'm not disagreeing with that. I dislike every Asari leader/war strategist out there (the Matriarchy?), but I don't think the species should be condemned for it.

 

Edit: Didn't know Shepard could be a ****** about the other races. So, I guess for the sake of symmetry the Asari shouldn't be spared; or at the very least forced sadness for them over everyother race.



#104
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

I'm not disagreeing with that. I dislike every Asari leader/war strategist out there (the Matriarchy?), but I don't think the species should be condemned for it.

Edit: Didn't know Shepard could be a ****** about the other races. So, I guess for the sake of symmetry the Asari shouldn't be spared; or at the very least forced sadness for them over everyother race.

Yep, like I said, repudiation of Tevos would be in the form of criticism for her government's actions. I'd have liked to see more blowback for extinctions caused by Shepard. Kill the Quarians? Garrus knocks your ass out on the hangar deck. No friendly bottle-shooting contest for you. Kill the Geth? Unavoidable confrontation with EDI (say, locking you in your cabin while she questions you as to your reasoning). Expect cold showers for a week. Etc.

#105
Obadiah

Obadiah
  • Members
  • 5 734 messages
@Massively

Evolution actually did select for morality, otherwise we wouldn't have had it for several thousand years. Where and why it arose is an interesting discussion, but beside the point.

Also, I haven't ascribed anything to you. I was commenting on the apathetic pro-human alien-manipulation worldview you described. If it it is fake or not is, again, beside the point.

#106
von uber

von uber
  • Members
  • 5 521 messages

Yep, like I said, repudiation of Tevos would be in the form of criticism for her government's actions. I'd have liked to see more blowback for extinctions caused by Shepard. Kill the Quarians? Garrus knocks your ass out on the hangar deck. No friendly bottle-shooting contest for you. Kill the Geth? Unavoidable confrontation with EDI (say, locking you in your cabin while she questions you as to your reasoning. Expect cold showers for a week. Etc.

 

I like this idea.



#107
TheOneTrueBioticGod

TheOneTrueBioticGod
  • Members
  • 1 110 messages

Yep, like I said, repudiation of Tevos would be in the form of criticism for her government's actions. I'd have liked to see more blowback for extinctions caused by Shepard. Kill the Quarians? Garrus knocks your ass out on the hangar deck. No friendly bottle-shooting contest for you. Kill the Geth? Unavoidable confrontation with EDI (say, locking you in your cabin while she questions you as to your reasoning. Expect cold showers for a week. Etc.

If you kill the Quarians, Garrus, who hates the Geth and could very well be in a relationship with Tali, just says some words and let's Shepard go. 
EDI would have serious issues with Shepard killing the Geth.
Hackett would chew Shepard out for stupidity if she let the Rachni-Mech live. 
Yeah, I agree. The game would have been better if we saw inter-personal consequences for our actions. 


  • Anubis722 aime ceci

#108
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

I like this idea.

Makes more sense than what we got.

(Yeah, it's old. Came up on Google.)

#109
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

If you kill the Quarians, Garrus, who hates the Geth and could very well be in a relationship with Tali, just says some words and let's Shepard go.
EDI would have serious issues with Shepard killing the Geth.
Hackett would chew Shepard out for stupidity if she let the Rachni-Mech live.
Yeah, I agree. The game would have been better if we saw inter-personal consequences for our actions.

I liked how Alistair would blow up at you for killing Connor or Isolde to resolve the situation at Redcliff (even though Isolde was a b**** to him when he was younger). Actions have consequences. I'd rather Garrus gave Shepard a black eye for something like that than be one meek voice among a gaggle of sycophants.

It'd be in character for EDI to lock you in your cabin, too. With certain dialogue paths (not shipping her with Joker), it's revealed she doesn't know how she compares with organics - she disregards military rank. Players might even see it as threatening for her to take control of Shepard like that, sealing you in your room for questioning.
  • Anubis722 et Sir DeLoria aiment ceci

#110
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

I liked how Alistair would blow up at you for killing Connor or Isolde to resolve the situation at Redcliff (even though Isolde was a b**** to him when he was younger). Actions have consequences. I'd rather Garrus gave Shepard a black eye for something like that than be one meek voice among a gaggle of sycophants.

It'd be in character for EDI to lock you in your cabin, too. With certain dialogue paths (not shipping her with Joker), it's revealed she doesn't know how she compares with organics - she disregards military rank. Players might even see it as threatening for her to take control of Shepard like that, sealing you in your room for questioning.

 

I'd like to see Garrus try to give Shepard a black eye. That said, I'd like a chance to defend and argue my rationale in the game to other characters.



#111
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

I'd like to see Garrus try to give Shepard a black eye. That said, I'd like a chance to defend and argue my rationale in the game to other characters.

Eh. If Garrus succeeds, it helps cut through Shepard's Mary Sue mystique (what would the rest of that be? "I'd like to see EDI try to lock that door?" A surprise punch followed by back-and-forth dialogue is better IMO than Shepard "losing" to Kai Leng).

I'm all for the RP latitude to defend your rationale. Makes sense if the person you're justifying yourself to still disagrees yet follows grudgingly because you're the only game in town (like if you turn over the evidence in ME2).

EDIT: Then again, it'd be interesting if they threw in a renegade interrupt lasting like 1/8th of a second to intercept the punch and put him in an armlock or something before he plants Shepard's ass on the floor.
  • Anubis722 aime ceci

#112
TheOneTrueBioticGod

TheOneTrueBioticGod
  • Members
  • 1 110 messages

Yeah, I remember in KOTOR, there comes a point where, SPOILERS, you can decide that you want to take back your Sith Empire. And how do the other characters react? Well, you end up having to kill a lot of squadmates. 



#113
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

Yeah, I remember in KOTOR, there comes a point where, SPOILERS, you can decide that you want to take back your Sith Empire. And how do the other characters react? Well, you end up having to kill a lot of squadmates. 

 

Yeup.

 

By the way, here's what I do for Spoliers.

 

tumblr_myub38CWnK1snnt41o1_500.png


  • Setiweb et DeinonSlayer aiment ceci

#114
Sir DeLoria

Sir DeLoria
  • Members
  • 5 246 messages
Honestly, I'm glad the Reapers are coming to save the galaxy from some Shepards...
  • DeinonSlayer et von uber aiment ceci

#115
Barquiel

Barquiel
  • Members
  • 5 848 messages
The Quarians were wiped out because Gerrel charged head first into the Geth (I guess the "quarians kill the geth" scene is similar). I am all for characters being devasted after Rannoch if the geth or the quarians are wiped out, but Shepard didn't kill them. Starting brawls on the Normandy would be a bit absurd.

#116
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

The Quarians were wiped out because Gerrel charged head first into the Geth (I guess the "quarians kill the geth" scene is similar). I am all for characters being devasted after Rannoch if the geth or the quarians are wiped out, but Shepard didn't kill them. Starting brawls on the Normandy would be a bit absurd.

Just so you're aware, in the "quarians kill the geth" scene, Shepard voices opposition to the upload, at which point the Geth representative starts to strangle you and the Quarian representative saves Shepard by either stabbing (Tali) or shooting (Raan) the Geth.

Gotta disagree with the rest, though. In the only outcome where the Quarians die, Shepard consciously withholds two key facts from the Quarians: A ) that the upload is taking place, and B ) that the Geth are willing to honor a ceasefire for the first time in their entire history. This second point is only true if Legion is present - the Geth VI plainly states its intent to exterminate them. The Quarians can only survive by killing the Geth in that case, and with Legion present, they're operating on the same assumption until Shepard informs them circumstances have changed.

Shepard makes his choice fully aware of the consequences (you're told by two people exactly what will happen beforehand). Whatever happens, Shepard owns it. To evade responsibility for said consequences can only be called denial or moral cowardice. In the interest of not turning this into one of those threads, I'll leave it at that.


  • Anubis722 et Sir DeLoria aiment ceci

#117
Sir DeLoria

Sir DeLoria
  • Members
  • 5 246 messages

The Quarians were wiped out because Gerrel charged head first into the Geth (I guess the "quarians kill the geth" scene is similar). I am all for characters being devasted after Rannoch if the geth or the quarians are wiped out, but Shepard didn't kill them. Starting brawls on the Normandy would be a bit absurd.


But he was responsible. Like a bystander clearly seeing a child about to be hit by a speeding car and not giving a damn. Shep doesn't even try to warn or at least tell the Quarian fleet what they're up against. He's backstabbing his allies and ignoring Hackett's orders.
  • Anubis722 aime ceci

#118
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages
@Necanor, just FYI, I really don't want to shift the thread into another QvG debate. I won't pursue it further unless Barquiel forces the issue.

#119
Sir DeLoria

Sir DeLoria
  • Members
  • 5 246 messages

@Necanor, just FYI, I really don't want to shift the thread into another QvG debate. I won't pursue it further unless Barquiel forces the issue.


I'm not, this is more about Shep's responsibility than the actual conflict between the two.

#120
Bob from Accounting

Bob from Accounting
  • Members
  • 1 527 messages

I still say we should have had the option to chew out Tevos (before the usual suspects start in on me, that's a repudiation of her government, not the species). If you save the Spectre instead of Kahje, Shepard's (autodialogue) attitude regarding the Hanar extinction is... less than charitable. As I've noted, you can shoot Mordin, lie to Wrex's face about it, shoot Wrex and lie to C-Sec about it. One of the dialogue options reacting to the Quarian extinction is "they were stupid." Shepard can kill millions and spit on their graves (I'd have liked to see more blowback for doing it, but that's another issue). So why exactly do the Asari get a free pass?

Shepard: "In case you haven't noticed, Joker, we just lost a few million people. This isn't the time!"
Joker: "Uh... really, Commander? You want to go there?"

I agree. The player should absolutely have had the option of being hostile to Tevos. Assuming the situation on Thessia wasn't rewritten entirely.

 

It's nice to see some criticism of the scenario that doesn't incorporate childish demands to exterminate all asari or whatnot.



#121
Barquiel

Barquiel
  • Members
  • 5 848 messages

Admiral Gerrel (if you delay uploading the Reaper code): "They're trying to flee! Stay on them!"

The geth did try to escape, but Gerrel wasn't about to let that happen. It's Shepards's fault that Gerral is only willing to listen to the magical blue/red button and stops attacking the Geth? We have Gerrel who doesn't listen to his fellow admirals and Tali/Raan who are not sharing the intel (that's very bad writing, sure). And maybe then we can start to blame Shepard.



#122
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages
I agree it's a very clumsy scene which sets up a false dichotomy. Peace without Reaper code would be my preferred outcome, but we aren't permitted to question the safety or philosophical reversal inherent in its use at any time even though your squad does so en rout to the facility (another shortcoming). Still, I stand by my point. Shepard owns the decision and the consequences. Even your squadmates refer to it as having been Shepard's choice afterwards.
  • grey_wind aime ceci

#123
Sir DeLoria

Sir DeLoria
  • Members
  • 5 246 messages
It literally is Shepards choice to be blatanly put. Both of you did point out, why in my opinion, this is by far the most poorly written scene in the game.

#124
Cainhurst Crow

Cainhurst Crow
  • Members
  • 11 374 messages

This must be such a lonely playthough with most of your old friends dead and all.



#125
MassivelyEffective0730

MassivelyEffective0730
  • Members
  • 9 230 messages

This must be such a lonely playthough with most of your old friends dead and all.

 

Not really. You can't really miss people you never really liked to begin with.

 

I suppose that's not true. Look at David.


  • Setiweb et themikefest aiment ceci