165 réponses à ce sujet

[JeffZero]

I love me some MGS4. It has some of the worst moments in the series for sure but also many of my favorites. It's kind of a jumbled mess and yet somehow I don't care.

If it were a BioWare game with such nonsense I would care a lot more but somehow I just luckily... don't.

[Raizo]

Holy ****, I just watched a S Rank 7 minute full playthrough of the main campaign by the guys at CVG on YouTube, 7 minutes. I am in awe of the skill of some of the gamers out there.

[AventuroLegendary]

 MGS2 > MGS PW 
 

[JeffZero]

MGS2 rocks.

[AresKeith]

MGS3 > MGS1 > MGS4 > MGS PW > MGS 2 >> MGR: Revengeance 

[JeffZero]

Revengeance is definitely last outta those. Only one I like less is MG1, which isn't really fair.

[AventuroLegendary]

MGS2 rocks.

I don't recall you being able to reverse-parachute enemy soldiers into your army in MGS2 

[felipejiraya]

I just listened to the Chico's tapes on GZ.

 

OH GOD

[Ryzaki]

This is what happens when you don't do your due diligence and buy a game solely because of the legacy of the franchise.

 

It's sad the days of just buying a game by a developer you trust are pretty much over.

[JeffZero]

I don't recall you being able to reverse-parachute enemy soldiers into your army in MGS2 

 

IF ONLY. The only thing greater than that would be the ability to do it to Russian soldiers voiced by Michael Bell.

 

"Arrrre you going to shoot me? If you'rrrre going to do ehht, then -- ...what the hell" *flies away*

[spirosz]

It's sad the days of just buying a game by a developer you trust are pretty much over.

 

Well, you still can, but don't expect them to deliver a quality title each time.  I know everyone has issues with this, I know I do - but I should really base games off of what that game itself is wanting to achieve, without looking at past titles.  It might be a bit different with sequels, but I think the same mindset should apply because you never know what happens in development, writers leave, programmers, etc - who could of make that "magic" with the last game happen and it might be missing for a future title.  

[AresKeith]

It's sad the days of just buying a game by a developer you trust are pretty much over.

 

To be fair, Kojima would've rather had Ground Zero be part of Phantom Pain. Konami is more than likely behind the cash grab

[Mr.House]

To be fair, Kojima would've rather had Ground Zero be part of Phantom Pain. Konami is more than likely behind the cash grab

Seeing as the length was not the only issue, this would not really do any good.

[spirosz]

Seeing as the length was not the only issue, this would not really do any good.

 

I thought that was the only issue, well minus the price.  

[AresKeith]

I thought that was the only issue, well minus the price.  

 

From the complaints I saw those were the main issues

[Isichar]

I watched the Angry Joe review on this. I admit I lost it when he made the joke about the next game being an open world funeral grounds

[Ryzaki]

Well, you still can, but don't expect them to deliver a quality title each time.  I know everyone has issues with this, I know I do - but I should really base games off of what that game itself is wanting to achieve, without looking at past titles.  It might be a bit different with sequels, but I think the same mindset should apply because you never know what happens in development, writers leave, programmers, etc - who could of make that "magic" with the last game happen and it might be missing for a future title.  

 

True but I don't have very high standards in the first place and if you can't meet those...

 

To be fair, Kojima would've rather had Ground Zero be part of Phantom Pain. Konami is more than likely behind the cash grab

 

Oooh. Konami is konami and Konami is the worst (I've been watching way too many past Jimquisition episodes).

[AresKeith]

AJ brought up a lack of exposition. I guess that's fair but jumping in at the 4th game chronologically is stupid.

 

Yea, that kinda falls on Joe for not getting the HD collection when he had plenty of time to do it before Ground Zero even came out

[JeffZero]

I don't know who this guy is because I don't follow e-celebrity tomfoolery for any of its highs or lows but if he's complaining about being confused by stuff when he hasn't played previous titles then I'm inclined to agree.

[Isichar]

Lack of exposition is not really a negative but its still something worth mentioning in a review just so people are aware of it. Personally, I hate it when a series holds your hand into later titles to cater to the newer crowd.

[TheChris92]

It's sad the days of just buying a game by a developer you trust are pretty much over.

Except it's not the brand that makes the games, it's the people behind it. What I think is important is to bring the people working on the project into the spotlight,so everyone can see what you got swinging around.

DA2's development team was generally a bit different from Origins, new lead designer and everything. I think I should link this article, who Croshaw wrote a short while back.

[Sir DeLoria]

I really liked Revengeance and I wouldn't really call it a MGS game, it's a just a spin-off. The game had some of the most fun boss battles I've seen in a while and the cutting mechanic was awesome.

[TheChris92]

MGS2 rocks.

Yes -- Yes, it does.