Sera "The Artful Dodger" discussion thread - V2 (now with more V1)
#43651
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 07:14
#43652
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 07:15
- veeia aime ceci
#43653
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 07:17
#43654
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 07:45
#43655
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 08:02
Spoiler
Meanwhile, Serza Disapproves.
- schulz100 et Duelist aiment ceci
#43656
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 08:20
Snip-Boing-Floppity.
That is all.
And good morning thread ![]()
- YourFunnyUncle aime ceci
#43657
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 08:37
#43658
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 08:53
I don't mind the basic idea of having to explore, I loved finding the bottles, that's what bothers me.
#43659
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 08:55
Guest_StreetMagic_*
I wish there was no farming at all. Lame. We should rise or fall by our words and choices. They did a good job with the Divine choice here (hard to game it...at least for now), but not the companions.
That said.. "question kink". Funny.
#43660
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 09:02
And Solas def has one, you know it. Woe to the Lavellan who uses a declarative sentence in bed instead of just saying "you horny? You wanna bang? You like that?"
#43661
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 09:02
I wish there was no farming at all. Lame. We should rise or fall by our words and choices. They did a good job with the Divine choice here (hard to game it...at least for now), but not the companions.
That said.. "question kink". Funny.
One thing that annoys me is the lack of retaliation from the villain. He does it exactly twice. Other than those two occasions it feels like we're easily kicking his butt. I wish there had been more 'official' confrontations. Spies or assassins in Skyhold, deserters from Inquisition ranks, a magical sickness unleashed on us (biomagical warfare?), supply lines cut, etc.
- veeia aime ceci
#43662
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 09:06
- Roamingmachine, schulz100, CrimsonN7 et 2 autres aiment ceci
#43663
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 09:07
This is going to seem a little weird at first, but I'm going to bring up Starcraft 2 in relation to what seems to me to be a key point of Sera's character, and hopefully by the time I'm done, it'll all make sense to everyone who isn't me.
There's a bit of banter between Solas and Sera, where Solas asks Sera what her long-term goal in dicking with/murdering the worst of the nobility is. They go back and forth for a while (Solas even offers tips), but a key point Solas raises and Sera objects to is attempting to reform the system into something better, and Sera only really doing what she's doing because she just doesn't like ****** nobles very much. Sera puts it as" Just lop off the top? What's the do except make a new top to just frig it all up?" And that's really as far as that line of thought ever goes between any of them again.
There's a moment that almost the complete reverse in a mission of Starcraft 2 (the first third of Starcraft 2) after you run a prison break and reform a small army of psychic supersoldiers held captive by the oppressive government. One of the key members (Matt) of the resistance notes that the real victory was letting out all the dissidents to the regime, and that the ultimate goal is building a better world. The guy who helped arrange the prison break (Tosh) is very deprecating of this, saying that the current tyrant of the system (Mengsk) will just replaced by someone just as worse if they take him down. When asked why he's even fighting if he thinks it's all so bleak, he responds that he's really only in it to kill Mengsk, and the almost-PC Jim Raynor more or less admits that that's his underlying motivation behind leading the revolution too (I'd recommend looking this up if any of this interested any of you. It's pretty cool to watch).
The thing is, these two instances of characterization are almost identical, yet subtly different so that the perceptions of them and the characters acting them out are ultimately vastly different. For one, even though SC2 is a strategy game, Raynor is basically the PC of the whole ride, and choice-selective missions come up throughout that give varying viewpoints on his character (this potential prison break and admittance that he's really only in this for revenge is one such instance; the other option sees him denounce Tosh as a psychopathic scumbag and project a slightly higher moral standard than only-for-revenge and results-at-all-costs).
Sera holds more or less the exact same characterization as Raynor in the prison break scenario; there's a bunch of high-up people she knows about that she considers utter pricks, so she sets out almost chiefly to ruin/end their lives, while helping out the downtrodden plebs in the process.
Yet, Sera, as a slightly annoying though endearing, kinda childish (but often very perceptive and somewhat wise, in her own way) party member takes a lot of flak for having such base, short-term motivation. As far as I've seen, no sort of flack ever got hurled Jim's way for really just being out for revenge against a truly terrible dictator (who he also kinda helped rise to power, but that's somewhat beside the point).
Just something that struck me as interesting and inter-game-relational.
- WildOrchid et veeia aiment ceci
#43664
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 09:15
If Sera was the same type of character but also one or more of the following, she'd have a much better reception, IMO: male, heterosexual, gruff, somber, traditionally eloquent, less abrasive, older, more respectful of the PC, more serious, had an overt tragic past, etc. People carry biases and lean into familiar tropes, and Sera is unique and very human in her particular brand of frustrating.
- YourFunnyUncle, hwlrmnky, CrimsonN7 et 2 autres aiment ceci
#43665
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 09:18
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Without the rivalry system, I think its necessary. I do agree with the fact that its kind of lame in execution...some are better than others though.
And Solas def has one, you know it. Woe to the Lavellan who uses a declarative sentence in bed instead of just saying "you horny? You wanna bang? You like that?"
Well.. I want us to fail at times. I want roleplaying to be somewhat enforced. The rivalry system was kind of cool, but it was basically approval either way. I like the idea of just disapproval. And dealing with the aftermath. While farming is a way to have your cake and eat it too. No better than DAO's gift system (made worse with the DLC).
#43666
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 10:22
Morning peeps !!
Argh my headech isnt gone..and my head hurt....ouach !
Its like having a bewbz hangover
But a good one !
Muh..when I first saw Sera..I though she was childish . If ya take the time to learn and know where she is coming from and why does she do what she does......she isnt childish . If she was..I be the 1st to run screaming down the hill . ![]()
#43667
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 10:32
Does Cory remind anyone else of Jafar? I mean apart from not being menacing, ever.
Would have been hilarious (and loving it) if we had a flirt option for Hawke...
I want the full romance.
Well, the SPEW train kinda derailed, so everyone is jumping on different ones. I ship Sera/Trevelyan.
Nah, it's just a different beast. Not for everyone certainly, but it still works.
#43668
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 10:36
To me the problem with respect to kicking Sera out at any time isn't that you can do it to her, it's that you can't do it to the others. Certainly once you are made inquisitor, the only person who you shouldn't be able to kick out on a whim is Cassandra, I think.
I like the fact that the caches are hidden and although she can recognise them, she doesn't necesarily know where they are going to be. It seems to makes sense in terms of her character. She'd know where they were in Val Royeaux, but for the rest of the world, not necessarily. It's not her territory. I suppose it would be cool to have some mission where you could ask her to put out word to her contacts to add the caches to the map...
As to her attitude to revolution, I think she has a point. Whatever political system you have, people will find a way to subvert it and get more power and influence for themselves. I think that the system we have now in democracies is preferable to feudalism, but a lot of the same stuff still goes on. In Thedas, we can see how Andraste tried to forge a better world but it has been subverted and changed by those with the lust for power and people's fears of "the other".
Personally, I don't think that means that one shouldn't strive for reform and reconciliation, but I can understand her point of view.
#43669
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 10:36
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Yeah, I agree it's a bummer that only she can get kicked. I just choose not recruit some now.
I like Sera though. I don't know what's so wrong about her that she gets the "kick" status. To me, she fits the Inquisition better than most. It's supposed to be a band of idealists, out to restore order. She's all that. And a neutral party in the Templar/Mage stuff too. She's on "everyone else's" side.
#43670
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 10:43
To me the problem with respect to kicking Sera out at any time isn't that you can do it to her, it's that you can't do it to the others. Certainly once you are made inquisitor, the only person who you shouldn't be able to kick out on a whim is Cassandra, I think.
I like the fact that the caches are hidden and although she can recognise them, she doesn't necesarily know where they are going to be. It seems to makes sense in terms of her character. She'd know where they were in Val Royeaux, but for the rest of the world, not necessarily. It's not her territory. I suppose it would be cool to have some mission where you could ask her to put out word to her contacts to add the caches to the map...
As to her attitude to revolution, I think she has a point. Whatever political system you have, people will find a way to subvert it and get more power and influence for themselves. I think that the system we have now in democracies is preferable to feudalism, but a lot of the same stuff still goes on. In Thedas, we can see how Andraste tried to forge a better world but it has been subverted and changed by those with the lust for power and people's fears of "the other".
Personally, I don't think that means that one shouldn't strive for reform and reconciliation, but I can understand her point of view.
The issue is always the same Grand Pa . As soon as someone want to leaaadd...it turn to crap .
One to lead them all...that doesnt make any sense to me . How one can speak billions of voices and opinions ?? Impossible . Instead that one...will just speak like those who are like him.....so only a certain group will advance..while the others wait their turn for another someone like them...come around and speak for them . But since we are no asari and dont live for 1000 years.....it just bad someone piled up on another one and so on...
I hate politic..and the system..and society in general ..bah...
#43671
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 10:50
To me the problem with respect to kicking Sera out at any time isn't that you can do it to her, it's that you can't do it to the others. Certainly once you are made inquisitor, the only person who you shouldn't be able to kick out on a whim is Cassandra, I think.
I like the fact that the caches are hidden and although she can recognise them, she doesn't necesarily know where they are going to be. It seems to makes sense in terms of her character. She'd know where they were in Val Royeaux, but for the rest of the world, not necessarily. It's not her territory. I suppose it would be cool to have some mission where you could ask her to put out word to her contacts to add the caches to the map...
As to her attitude to revolution, I think she has a point. Whatever political system you have, people will find a way to subvert it and get more power and influence for themselves. I think that the system we have now in democracies is preferable to feudalism, but a lot of the same stuff still goes on. In Thedas, we can see how Andraste tried to forge a better world but it has been subverted and changed by those with the lust for power and people's fears of "the other".
Personally, I don't think that means that one shouldn't strive for reform and reconciliation, but I can understand her point of view.
In my view, Seras ideas about fighting "the man" is pretty basic anarchists folly where the anarchists fail to realize that power structures will always form wherever there are more than one people in permanent contact. As she's not really a forward, or any kind of, thinker this is perfectly in-character for her
Though i would have liked her to have a bit more depth to what she does instead of being....Well, young and naive.
And about the caches, i don't know if they are there regardless but if you bring Sera to the ball you can ask about them and find them scattered about the palace. More things like this around Orlais would have been cool. Any of them in Val Royaux? Would make sense for there to be some as that was her base of operations.
#43672
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 10:55
In my view, Seras ideas about fighting "the man" is pretty basic anarchists folly where the anarchists fail to realize that power structures will always form wherever there are more than one people in permanent contact. As she's not really a forward, or any kind of, thinker this is perfectly in-character for her
Though i would have liked her to have a bit more depth to what she does instead of being....Well, young and naive.
And about the caches, i don't know if they are there regardless but if you bring Sera to the ball you can ask about them and find them scattered about the palace. More things like this around Orlais would have been cool. Any of them in Val Royaux? Would make sense for there to be some as that was her base of operations.
Hum...
Actually it make sense , because thats what she hate . this whole....build a system . Thats why she turned Solas advice about making the red jenny a solid organization .
And I agree with her , cose..just look at Leliana . She went from bard....doing something for her psycho lover..now she has a whole organization . And the more ya care...the more ya get shaped and ya organization is shaped as well . And it doesnt mean its always good ...
While she keep it 'Doing it for fun and all anonymous'......she destroy and block any of that 'gonna change and get changed for the greater good'..its like....hum..a block against change it self . Like...a way to avoid to become one more carta or crow....
So in a way , she favor her own individuality more then..lets band together for the greater good . Wich in a way is refreshing . Cose its so easy to get lost when ya want to do good...before ya know it..ya are a herald..and have tons of paper work..and a chantry mother blabbering away no stop..AHh tha headech ![]()
#43673
Guest_StreetMagic_*
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 10:57
Guest_StreetMagic_*
There's folly in Sera's anarchism, but in the Inquisition, she's with something greater than herself. Mostly you're just chasing big bads. Not messing with too much politics.
Or so I think. It could be an even greater folly, I guess, depending on the player. lol
#43674
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 11:02
But she precisely does realise that. She knows that someone else will just rise to fill the power vacuum so she doesn't see the point in doing anything more than have fun at the expense of the powerful. She doesn't want a revolution and explicitly says so in her banter with Solas.In my view, Seras ideas about fighting "the man" is pretty basic anarchists folly where the anarchists fail to realize that power structures will always form wherever there are more than one people in permanent contact. As she's not really a forward, or any kind of, thinker this is perfectly in-character for her
Though i would have liked her to have a bit more depth to what she does instead of being....Well, young and naive.
#43675
Posté 18 décembre 2014 - 11:03
Hum...
Actually it make sense , because thats what she hate . this whole....build a system . Thats why she turned Solas advice about making the red jenny a solid organization .
And I agree with her , cose..just look at Leliana . She went from bard....doing something for her psycho lover..now she has a whole organization . And the more ya care...the more ya get shaped and ya organization is shaped as well . And it doesnt mean its always good ...
While she keep it 'Doing it for fun and all anonymous'......she destroy and block any of that 'gonna change and get changed for the greater good'..its like....hum..a block against change it self . Like...a way to avoid to become one more carta or crow....
So in a way , she favor her own individuality more then..lets band together for the greater good . Wich in a way is refreshing . Cose its so easy to get lost when ya want to do good...before ya know it..ya are a herald..and have tons of paper work..and a chantry mother blabbering away no stop..AHh tha headech
Responsibility and duty are what shaped Leliana, kitten. They come with leadership and weight terribly but someone's got to bear them to keep the world from tearing itself apart so the Red Jennies can be the carefree prankster that they are ![]()





Retour en haut





