Aller au contenu

Photo

Sera "The Artful Dodger" discussion thread - V2 (now with more V1)


100552 réponses à ce sujet

#48901
Dgyre

Dgyre
  • Members
  • 1 305 messages

Well that is a separate debate, and one perhaps it is one I am wrong about. I need more data and experience with her to speak on that more generally.

 

 

 

Actually she can tolerate some things. For example, she can tolerate a mage inquisitor. She learned to tolerate Cole. She managed to tolerate the fade pretty well (well it needed some breakdown first :P).

 

It's elven religion the only thing she can't tolerate i think. Comes from a deep wound, it would seem.



#48902
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

The Dalish gods only accept elves, whereas Brother Burkel's quest in DAO shows us that the Chantry accepts Dwarves and Sera being an Andrastian shows us that at least one Chantry accepted at least one Elf.

 

Technically, the Creators were trapped in the Eternal City (with the known exception of one, who was apparently murdered), and the elven religion is as focused on the Elvhen as the dwarven belief system is on the dwarves. There's little reason for non-elves to follow the religion because it's focused on the elves (from a time when Thedas was Elvhenan, and before the humans landed on Par Vollen), although Feynriel did, and I'd imagine the historical Aveline did, too. Perhaps Hall, who is culturally Dalish, despite being a shemlen.

 

While the Chantry accepts non-humans (since their aim is to convert everyone), it also views them as being further away from the Maker because they aren't human, which is why only humans are allowed to enter the priesthood.

 

Sera is an Andrastian elf, and the elves in the Alienages are descended from the elves who were forced to convert to the Chantry after the fall of the Dales, so I don't imagine anyone doubts that Sera follows the Andrastian faith. I'm sure Sera's past might shed some more light on how she came to be who she is, since we only have snippets of information, including about her upbringing in the Alienage and with Lady Emmald. Sera came from Denerim, and we know about the purge, including the massacre of the orphanage; perhaps she lost people she cared about during that time.


  • Roamingmachine aime ceci

#48903
veeia

veeia
  • Members
  • 4 986 messages
Andrastrianism isn't a more inclusive religion inherently, it's just the religion of the dominant, colonizing power and therefore must assimilate the other races into it. It certainly doesn't theologically accept the dwarves on the surface textual reading of the chant, for example.

Dalish religion is the opposite, it must remain somehat exclusionary so it doesn't get assimilated by the larger culture, like how Feraldan Andrastianism has elements of Avaar beliefs.

I'm actually really sad that we didn't get to play with how dwarven, Qunari, and elven Andrastrians would merge their cultural backgrounds with Andrastrianism to make it their own, as that is actually what tends to happen with groups like that, but so it goes.

#48904
WildOrchid

WildOrchid
  • Members
  • 7 256 messages

I just replayed that scene with my second elf character, and noticed a few things.  First, with my human, Sera starts off the conversation by laughing at the Dalish for being wrong.  She at least doesn't do that if you are Dalish.  I guess that's one good thing to say about her, lol.

 

Second, I'm not sure the issue with Sera is so much the belief in the Creators by itself (which is why there's no issue when the Inquisitor is non-elf).  It seems to me she worries the elven Inquisitor will end up like the other "elfy elves" who care only for the past and Sera knows she will never live up to that and doesn't want to be with someone who puts a lot of themselves into it.  Sera would prefer the two of you to look towards a future instead.   There's no reason for her to worry that a qunari Tal Vashoth would become obsessed with lost elven glory, for example, but this is a concern with a Dalish elf.

 

Interesting, i thought her reaction is the same. It's like she doesn't want to hurt the dalish's feelings? Then again people said that Sera does laugh to an elf inquisitor... maybe she doesn't do that when romanced? Still, that's something i didn't know.

 

Also, agreed. I think i have to change what i said about her being afraid of "new gods"....sounds more like she's afraid of the elf inquisitor being too elfy like other elves.



#48905
YourFunnyUncle

YourFunnyUncle
  • Members
  • 7 588 messages

I understand Sera's motivations. I understand why she feels she needs to make the ultimatum. It's entirely in character. It fits with her attitude towards Dalish culture and "elfy" elves throughout the game. The only point I personally was making is that it's all coming from her. She doesn't feel that she can have a relationship with someone who believes in the Dalish religion after Mythal. It's not coming from the Inquisitor. The inquisitor isn't forcing her to do anything. She may feel that way but it's her personal insecurities talking, wherever they may come from.

 

Another, middle ground option would have been nice sure, but am not sure it would have a different reaction from Sera.  Especially when terrified, it has to be A or B with her.

Oh I doubt it would, but I think that not giving the Inquisitor the option to even attempt it was a bit of an oversight. It made the conversation seem less realistic to me.


  • Lady Luminous aime ceci

#48906
jlb524

jlb524
  • Members
  • 19 954 messages

Interesting, i thought her reaction is the same. It's like she doesn't want to hurt the dalish's feelings? Then again people said that Sera does laugh to an elf inquisitor... maybe she doesn't do that when romanced? S

 

I think that's during the fallout for an elf who romances Solas and has him remove her vallaslin (but then he dumps her).  Sera notices that they are gone and asks about it.  She finds it amusing that the Dalish were wrong about them.

 

Sera can be insensitive and a-holey at times but I guess she's a bit better in a romance.



#48907
veeia

veeia
  • Members
  • 4 986 messages

lmfao, does she really?

 

I cannot imagine the reaction of a person who went into DA:I on their first PT wanting to romance Solas and befriend Sera as a Dalish elf. That must have been like a punch to the face every five minutes. 


  • AtreiyaN7 et AddieTheElf aiment ceci

#48908
raging_monkey

raging_monkey
  • Members
  • 22 921 messages

lmfao, does she really?
 
I cannot imagine the reaction of a person who went into DA:I on their first PT wanting to romance Solas and befriend Sera as a Dalish elf. That must have been like a punch to the face every five minutes.

yeah.. its kick in the soft spot

#48909
YourFunnyUncle

YourFunnyUncle
  • Members
  • 7 588 messages
Oh one more thing before I go to sleep: I do think that it's fair to say that a Dalish inquisitor should have seen such a moment coming. It's not like Sera is ever shy about sharing her views on Dalish culture.

By the same token though, a Dalish elf would have to have been accepting of Sera's Andrastean faith to even get as far as Mythal, so again to say that simply by believing in her own gods she's forcing Sera to abandon her faith just doesn't add up outside of Sera's head...
  • AddieTheElf et The Loyal Nub aiment ceci

#48910
hong

hong
  • Members
  • 2 012 messages
A dominant religion doesn't necessarily have to assimilate others. The Romans, for example, didn't care what their conquered subjects believed, as long as they paid their taxes. It was only in the late empire that religious persecutions took place, generally against Christians. Conversely, a minority religion can certainly have a proselytizing mindset -- you might say that's how they go from being a minority to a majority faith in the first place.
  • veeia aime ceci

#48911
introverted_assassin

introverted_assassin
  • Members
  • 2 230 messages


Nah, I'm a finn. Just used the 'vision quest' term because it loosely fits what I was trying to explain :)


I see.

#48912
Not a Cat Doll

Not a Cat Doll
  • Members
  • 290 messages

Drive by comment for the Sera thread: I have to say that I really, really like Sera. I thought I was going to romance Cullen first, but it just wasn't meant to be, once my IQ met Sera. She is unpretentious and flawed, and she can kill dragons without breaking a sweat (a nice bonus!) Plus, I like the fact that she contains contradictions, and has a dorky laugh. I like the fact that she talks about what upsets her and motivates her in her own words, and not like she's reading from a human resources pamphlet, to the discomfit of ideologues everywhere (even the ones on her side.) She's just...mighty real. And cute as hell. :wub:

 

Laters!


  • YourFunnyUncle, Bowie Hawkins, Artemis Leonhart et 2 autres aiment ceci

#48913
hong

hong
  • Members
  • 2 012 messages
I'll have you know, some of my best friends are human resources.

#48914
hong

hong
  • Members
  • 2 012 messages

I'll have you know, some of my best friends are human resources.

Human resources EMPLOYEES.


Human resources employees.

#48915
raging_monkey

raging_monkey
  • Members
  • 22 921 messages

Human resources EMPLOYEES.
Human resources employees.

of course they are "employees" * winks*

#48916
Not a Cat Doll

Not a Cat Doll
  • Members
  • 290 messages

Human resources EMPLOYEES.


Human resources employees.

I like the original post better! :D



#48917
Master Warder Z_

Master Warder Z_
  • Members
  • 19 824 messages
I wonder if Sera will find a purpose after the Inquisition.

Red Jenny can't last forever.

#48918
raging_monkey

raging_monkey
  • Members
  • 22 921 messages
Dialog i got implies she stays

#48919
Bowie Hawkins

Bowie Hawkins
  • Members
  • 556 messages

How do you justify this statement? it makes no logical sense. 

 

You're mistaken about that. Sera is putting the Principle of contradiction and the Principle of the excluded middle into practice where the matter of the two faiths are concerned, with the logical framework she's applying is that either X (Andrastianism) or Y (the Dalish faith) is true, but that they can't both be. So since she believes that X is true, insisting that Y is true is telling her that X is false. You can choose to argue that she's wrong about which belief is false, but the logic is solid even if the conclusion she choose to draw isn't ultimately the correct one.

 

I don't understand this stance that Sera is the paragon of Tolerance and is the Inquisitor is who is so very terrible in this situation. 

 

If I had ever said anything even remotely resembling "Sera is a paragon of tolerance" rather than pointing out that dismissing Sera's beliefs is itself intolerant, then that would have been a good point rather than a strawman argument. 

 

But it's ok for a qunari, human or dwarf inquisitors to use the "I'm not sure" they're still trying to push her toward accepting that same faith right. If four people from different races say the same thing and it's acceptable from the three of the races that weren't part of the old beliefs but the one that belongs to that group it's automatically unacceptable, isn't it racist against the elf inquisitors? 

 

Based on her dialogues and banter, humans, dwarves, and qunari have never tried to make her act like a "proper elf" the way that elves have - although in the case of humans she might have faced the same sort of racism that elves like Solas have subjected her to ("You are the farthest thing from what you were meant to be" being one of the more blatant examples of Solas doing that which I could recall).



#48920
Fiery Phoenix

Fiery Phoenix
  • Members
  • 18 971 messages
Second, I'm not sure the issue with Sera is so much the belief in the Creators by itself (which is why there's no issue when the Inquisitor is non-elf).  It seems to me she worries the elven Inquisitor will end up like the other "elfy elves" who care only for the past and Sera knows she will never live up to that and doesn't want to be with someone who puts a lot of themselves into it.  Sera would prefer the two of you to look towards a future instead.   There's no reason for her to worry that a qunari Tal Vashoth would become obsessed with lost elven glory, for example, but this is a concern with a Dalish elf.

That makes a LOT of sense to me.

 

How she acts and responds to you makes it look like it is directly a matter of belief, but then it turns out it's more complicated than that when you consider what happens with non-elves.

 

Though, it does make me wonder if that means she's looking for a long-term relationship with the Dalish Inquisitor. If she's seemingly more worried about who the Inquisitor will be instead of who they are right now, then that tells me she's thinking about the relationship from a broad, long-term perspective. Not something you'd normally expect from Sera, but there it is.



#48921
Bowie Hawkins

Bowie Hawkins
  • Members
  • 556 messages

Second, I'm not sure the issue with Sera is so much the belief in the Creators by itself (which is why there's no issue when the Inquisitor is non-elf).  It seems to me she worries the elven Inquisitor will end up like the other "elfy elves" who care only for the past and Sera knows she will never live up to that and doesn't want to be with someone who puts a lot of themselves into it.  Sera would prefer the two of you to look towards a future instead.   There's no reason for her to worry that a qunari Tal Vashoth would become obsessed with lost elven glory, for example, but this is a concern with a Dalish elf.

 

Like it says in the song, "Why change the past when you can rule this day?" Sera wants somebody who can accept her. Andraste does, so she believes in Andrastianism down to her toes, and if a Dalish Inquisitor declares an adherence to the elven gods during the post-Well scene, it comes across to her as gods that are at best false and at worst demons being more important to the woman she loves than she is, and not being willing to accept that sort of rejection.



#48922
Wissenschaft 2.0

Wissenschaft 2.0
  • Members
  • 1 982 messages

The Dalish Inquisitor just declared adherence to worshiping false idols that kept the elves as pet slaves. I'd have the same react as Sera does.


  • ComedicSociopathy aime ceci

#48923
LobselVith8

LobselVith8
  • Members
  • 16 993 messages

The Dalish Inquisitor just declared adherence to worshiping false idols that kept the elves as pet slaves. I'd have the same react as Sera does.

 

I don't recall Solas saying that all the Creators forced the elves into servitude. In fact, Flemeth tells Merrill not to kneel before her.


  • Roamingmachine aime ceci

#48924
rubynorman

rubynorman
  • Members
  • 1 373 messages

I wonder if Sera will find a purpose after the Inquisition.

Red Jenny can't last forever.

In one of my playthrough, Sera is a sister/good friend to the Inquisitor, Inky welcomed Sera to stay with the Inquisition after the main plot, and said something like "we are a family now". Sera said "Shut it, you, I cry, I'm punching everyone"

 

Sera is glad that she found a place/family to be a part of :D


  • Bowie Hawkins aime ceci

#48925
veeia

veeia
  • Members
  • 4 986 messages

A dominant religion doesn't necessarily have to assimilate others. The Romans, for example, didn't care what their conquered subjects believed, as long as they paid their taxes. It was only in the late empire that religious persecutions took place, generally against Christians. Conversely, a minority religion can certainly have a proselytizing mindset -- you might say that's how they go from being a minority to a majority faith in the first place.


Yeah, you're right, I didn't mean to say it as a blanket statement. Genghis Khan is a great example of this too, he actively encouraged the spread of ideas and dialogue between faiths.

Andrastrianism however becomes a justification of those colonizing actions, because turning people "back to the Maker" is a mandate of the faith, so converting as many people as possible means opening up the faith, I think.

Anyway, I think its strange to take "sides" when it comes to Sera vs Dalish Quizzie. Neither is wrong or right, they are just coming at something from a fundamentally different perspective. The biggest problem, as others have noted, is that the scene doesn't allow Quizzie to react as naturally as Sera does. This is a consistent problem in the game, I think, where the PC's dialogue is mostly reactive to the needs of the characterization of the NPC, instead of a balance between two individuals.

Another, less controversial, example of this is when you first meet Sera and she explains her "friends" to you. You're given the option of asking her if she is offering spies, soldiers, or noble allies. This dialogue is set up for Sera to correct you, and doesn't allow for the perspective that a PC might automatically understand what she's offering. Which for my Carta dwarf, felt very off. But the scene is very effective for Sera's character. It's a difficult balance, offering a fully voiced protagonist who is customizable but limited by word budgets, and I think that this game had a lot of issues with it. Hopefully something they'll learn from moving forward. Sera is hardly the only character who suffers from that, Solas is another big one, IMO.
  • Roamingmachine et Lady Luminous aiment ceci