100552 réponses à ce sujet

[warblewobble]

I'm kind of sad that so many of the extra power amulets were removed. Used to use those to buff passives for my party.

[Inverse_Twilight]

Bull's okay if you spec him properly; either make him the tank, or make him wait until after the actual tank starts aggroing. Or babysit him with a KE, I guess.

A high-level Bull is quite good, but he is not very good early game. It's a shame because I do enjoy his banter. I tend to use him a lot when my Inky is the tank and he can just be a primary damage dealer. I have tried using him as a sword and board tank, but I prefer him as a two-hander. Also, I prefer to use Blackwall as my tank. His specialization is just made for tanking.

[Inverse_Twilight]

I'm kind of sad that so many of the extra power amulets were removed. Used to use those to buff passives for my party.

I was really disappointed that they got rid of most of the Amulets of Power. I was really annoyed because I never used the looting exploit to duplicate them. I only ever used that exploit to get schematics because it is so hard to get good ones.

[Sunnie]

Ahem...

 

[Duelist]

Bull's pretty good if he has high crit chance since he can lower his own cooldowns, keep himself alive and put enemies down quickly but he's still kinda meh (not to mention largely unnecessary) against bosses.

[Sunnie]

With Bull, it's all about the banter! With my dps duo (me and Sera), stuff doesn't last very long.

[XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX]

Also, I prefer to use Blackwall as my tank. His specialization is just made for tanking.

I once made Blackwall use 2H weapons rather then be the regular sword & shield warrior, i regretted that decision when i noticed him repeatedly dying way quicker then usual

[Inverse_Twilight]

I once made Blackwall use 2H weapons rather then be the regular sword & shield warrior, i regretted that decision when i noticed him repeatedly dying way quicker then usual

I tried using him as a 2H warrior and I noticed that he dies a lot too. Not as quickly as Bull, but still I find that I have to back him up with my Knight Enchanter so he survives longer. I really wish that the two hander tree had some defensive passives. It would help with survivability. I find it hard to play a two handed warror,especially on Nightmare. I usually end up switching to a sword and shield warrior.

[XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX]

I tried using him as a 2H warrior and I noticed that he dies a lot too. Not as quickly as Bull, but still I find that I have to back him up with my Knight Enchanter so he survives longer. I really wish that the two hander tree had some defensive passives. It would help with survivability. I find it hard to play a two handed warror,especially on Nightmare. I usually end up switching to a sword and shield warrior.

Yeah, 2H warriors pretty much suck when it comes to survivability, especially during the early stages of the game, is why i usually avoid using IB much till i can get him some decent armour

[Inverse_Twilight]

Yeah, 2H warriors pretty much suck when it comes to survivability, especially during the early stages of the game, is why i usually avoid using IB much till i can get him some decent armour

I thought that Blackwall would do alright as a 2H warrior with his Champion Specialization, but he needs to be babysat just like Bull.

[SardaukarElite]

I like the warrior class...bashing people with a shield and making pancakes out of enemies with a two hander is fun. I'm easily amused, I guess.

 

My current character also hits things with a shield. It's fun.

[XxPrincess(x)ThreatxX]

I thought that Blackwall would do alright as a 2H warrior with his Champion Specialization, but he needs to be babysat just like Bull.

Is a shame since it forces you to pretty much only play as a S&S warrior for the most part, the high damage of a 2H weapon is hardly worth it if their gonna be either heavily damaged or knocked out alot

Im glad i prefer playing as mages or rogues, Tempest FTW

[Artemis Leonhart]

My current character also hits things with a shield. It's fun.

 

 

I know, right? Shield bash ftw.

[Duelist]

I thought that Blackwall would do alright as a 2H warrior with his Champion Specialization, but he needs to be babysat just like Bull.

Blackwall is the best 2H IMO although it depends on what weapon he has (Ornate Battleaxe is the best if you can find it, Jagged Battleaxe if you can't) and how high his crit chance is.

Get it to about 50% and between Flow Of Battle and Walking Fortress, he can keep himself alive and dish out some decent damage.

[SardaukarElite]

I know, right? Shield bash ftw.

 

Opening the duel with the Blades of Hessan leader by ricocheting him off a wall was hilarious.

[KaiserShep]

Opening the duel with the Blades of Hessan leader by ricocheting him off a wall was hilarious.

When I make my dwarf, I think I'll have to open the battle with that. It's even better when that giant guy is tossed by a dwarf XD

I challenged that guy after switching to dual-wield and Cassandra took it upon herself to toss him for me.

[Inverse_Twilight]

My current character also hits things with a shield. It's fun.

  
I love playing as an elven female sword and board warrior. I think it is hilarious that a tiny elven woman is bashing the crap out of everyone with her shield.

Is a shame since it forces you to pretty much only play as a S&S warrior for the most part, the high damage of a 2H weapon is hardly worth it if their gonna be either heavily damaged or knocked out alot :mellow:Im glad i prefer playing as mages or rogues, Tempest FTW

My current warrior is a sword and shield reaver and her DPS is pretty decent. I don't think its a toss up between being a tank and doing lots of damage. My character is a bit of both.

[Artemis Leonhart]

  
I love playing as an elven female sword and board warrior. I think it is hilarious that a tiny elven woman is bashing the crap out of everyone with her shield.

My current warrior is a sword and shield reaver and her DPS is pretty decent. I don't think its a toss up between being a tank and doing lots of damage. My character is a bit of both.

 

One of my canon Quizzys is a female elven s&s fighter, and Reaver to boot...if someone so much hints at thinking that she's too tiny for the weapons she carries, they'll get their skull bashed to death with her shield or mauled with dragon claws.   

I can attest for s&s Reavers having decent DPS and defense.

For added hilarity, I also like to play a dwarf who uses two handed weapons, it's always amusing to watch this little fortress of destruction flatten to the ground things twice or more her size.

[Lady Luminous]

Managed to get a really pretty screenie of Sera smiling, thought y'all might enjoy:

 

[Duelist]

Managed to get a really pretty screenie of Sera smiling, thought y'all might enjoy:

It's not working for me.

[Bowie Hawkins]

 

How? You left out anything approaching a justification for her actions.

 

That's not true.

[Lady Luminous]

It's not working for me.

 

Augh, again? I have got to stop using this uploader site. Okay, give me a second.

[Inverse_Twilight]

Managed to get a really pretty screenie of Sera smiling, thought y'all might enjoy:
 

I have to say, I prefer this eyeliner mod instead of the other one. The freckled one looks like she is wearing too much eyeliner.

[SardaukarElite]

  I love playing as an elven female sword and board warrior. I think it is hilarious that a tiny elven woman is bashing the crap out of everyone with her shield.

 

I'm playing a human woman but it turns out they're as short as elves (I thought you'd be taller!). Which means Sera is even taller than I thought she was.

[Dean_the_Young]

That's not true.

 

What's reasonable or right about murdering innocent people for a crime they didn't do because of a racist equivalence fallacy based on a history they weren't even alive to have participated in?

 

 

Killing people for crimes they didn't commit ain't justified, mate.