losing a large warship and 200 seamen to acquire intelligence that could have been gotten in another way is not what I would call "efficient" but then again nothing about that mission is
Could have been a skeleton crew onboard for all we knew, the dreadnought itself presented just enough value to see whether Bull would chose the Qun or his men, after all, he was supposedly one of their top agents?
It's not like we've not seen the Qunari do these sorts of excercises before, in DA2 the Arishok leaks info about the gaatlok (actually saar-qamek) to see if anyone will attempt to steal it, purposefully sacrificing the token amount of guards he assigns to guard it in order to make it look valuable enough? In that case, he deemed the knowledge of the conspirators plotting against them more valuable than a few guards lives? But, if the conspirators hadn't taken the bait, then they weren't enough of a threat to worry about and his men would still be alive, thus he loses nothing?
While it might seem a waste to send a dreadnought on a potentially suicidal mission, the probable reasoning behind doing it that way was because the desired outcome for them was to walk away with both the and Bull's loyalty intact... which means their gamble would have cost them nothing and instead gained them an alliance with the Inquisition? To drag out that (tired) old meme, "Heavy risk, but the priiize".
Furthermore, the Qunari's value on the acceptable lose of various assets seem to be flexible when it comes to the success of the mission?
In DA2, the Arishok was not angry when Hawke admitted to being forced to kill the Arvaraad (he was actually impressed with both the skill it took and Hawke's honesty), because as far as he was concerned, the mission to recapture and kill the Saarebas was all that mattered and it had been accomplished, while those men were unfortunately collateral damage taken while in service to the greater goal?
The Qunari have an extremely alien way of thinking and while they don't usually act without careful consideration, they do seem to be in favour of taking calculated risks if they deem something potentially warrants such gambles to be taken? Losing a gamble however as badly as they can in DAI, is probably why they immediately cut off any prospect of an Alliance and declare Bull Tal-Vashoth?
I love that Sera uses slang, and specifically that she uses British slang. In fact the only thing that annoys me is when the odd Americanism gets dropped in. It doesn't happen too often but when it does I find it jarring, like when she says "a seat needs a butt". "A seat needs a bum" would've been the usual British way of saying that. Or an arse, or even a backside, but not a butt. That's 100% American. There are a few other examples that I can't bring to mind at the moment.
I wonder if the VAs get any say in amending the dialogue, because were I Robyn Addison, I think I would've picked them up on a few things, given the chance...
It's not just Sera who does it, I've noticed that a lot of dialogue in the game (and indeed the entire franchise) is often transatlantic, where people switch between US and UK idioms quite frequently without ryhme or reason? Even the subtitles aren't immune, half the spellings follow the US version, while others favour the UK's (and Canada's) spelling instead?
Might just be a reflection of how the language gap is closing between the two sides of the pond, so that a lot of American phrases and slang has found it's way into British vernacular (although not so much the other way around), to the point where half the time it's US origin isn't even noticed?
(Although I take umbrage with how the police are now sometimes being referred to as "Feds" by inner-city teenagers, using that word is wrong on so many levels, I honestly don't even know where to begin?)
Personally, I'm hoping that the language gap doesn't close entirely, I don't want to take "American English" off my CV as a foreign language?
