100542 réponses à ce sujet

[YourFunnyUncle]

 

Edit: Yes! Top of the page again, continuing the tradition...

[introverted_assassin]

Bam! Made it!

[Serza]

Promised something. I wonder if I uploaded that vid... Huh, probably not.

 

 

Something else, then!

 

No way. Sera hates the countryside. City all the way.

 

Near Denerim, if she wants. Otherwise, somewhere in Orlais. In case of boredom, do some Jenny things to the local nobles!

[The Loyal Nub]

Congrats on making 4,000 pages.

 

Sera is a city girl unless her Qun behbeh has a little cabin in the woods.

[Rel Fexive]

Woohoo!

Back later with celebratory screenies.

[The Loyal Nub]

[Rel Fexive]

Well, as promised here's some of my favourite Sera pics to celebrate 4000 pages!

 

Spoiler

Out walking.

 

 

Cookies.

 

 

Chats.

 

 

"You told everyone we were lovers?!"

 

 

"This one's got no underpants...."

 

 

"You okay?"

 

 

Becoming 'Honey Tongue'.

 

 

More chats.

 

 

Pride, the good kind.

 

 

Absolutely what she was thinking, yeah?

 

 

Together.

 

 

Pretty!

 

 

Pranks.

 

 

Proposal.

 

 

"All the friggin' yesses!"

 

 

Dress!

 

 

Two.

 

[FemHawke FTW]

Wooo! 4,000

[Xilizhra]

Yay for four thousand, though I feel like the celebration is slightly premature until we hit page 4001? As it hasn't been 4000 pages yet, technically.

 

But regardless, yay for one of Dragon Age's most vividly written characters, and first actual lesbian romance option. For all that can be said about Sera, she does have, in my opinion, one of the best romance plots in the entire franchise.

[YourFunnyUncle]

Yay for four thousand, though I feel like the celebration is slightly premature until we hit page 4001? As it hasn't been 4000 pages yet, technically.

 

But regardless, yay for one of Dragon Age's most vividly written characters, and first actual lesbian romance option. For all that can be said about Sera, she does have, in my opinion, one of the best romance plots in the entire franchise.

That was also technically true in the year 2000. Didn't stop anyone from partying.

[AnimalBoy]

[ComedicSociopathy]

Happy 4000 everyone!!!

[YourFunnyUncle]

 

Is that yours? I saw them but I have to say they don't do much for me. A full statue, maybe, but I find busts to be a rather odd form.

[SardaukarElite]

4k!

 

That was also technically true in the year 2000. Didn't stop anyone from partying.

 

It doesn't really matter when you start counting from a date set retrospectively. 

[AnimalBoy]

Is that yours? I saw them but I have to say they don't do much for me. A full statue, maybe, but I find busts to be a rather odd form.

 

Yes it's mine. I have Sera and Iron Bull both. I love them but i was surprised by the size difference between the two despite both being the same price.

[YourFunnyUncle]

4k!

 

 

It doesn't really matter when you start counting from a date set retrospectively. 

 

Without passing comment on the political reasons for choosing our current calendar, the fact remains that there is no year zero, so the third millennium didn't technically start until 2001. I think the confusion arises because we are used to celebrating birthdays and anniversaries, where the ticking over of the first digit does indeed signify a nice round number in base ten.

 

Yes it's mine. I have Sera and Iron Bull both. I love them but i was surprised by the size difference between the two despite both being the same price.

 

I'm guessing that they're to scale, then?

[AnimalBoy]

Without passing comment on the political reasons for choosing our current calendar, the fact remains that there is no year zero, so the third millennium didn't technically start until 2001. I think the confusion arises because we are used to celebrating birthdays and anniversaries, where the ticking over of the first digit does indeed signify a nice round number in base ten.

 

 

I'm guessing that they're to scale, then?

 

I guess. i was just surprised. Since they were the same price i had figured that they'd be the same size. Not complaining too much.The quality is good and i have two members of the Inquisition protecting my house.

[YourFunnyUncle]

This PT I've been using Sera/Cass/Cole a bit for the awesome dragonslaying power of Mark of Death/Thousand Cuts. Just heard this banter for the first time ever:

 

Cassandra: Sera, I noticed one of my books is missing.

Sera: Maybe check with Creepy. He touches everything.

Cole: I like the stories in her head more than the stories on the page.

Cassandra: Cole didn't take it.

Sera: Right, which one?

Cassandra: The one with all the illustrations.

Sera: Oh, that one was full on. I threw it under your bed.

Cassandra: You don't know how to ask permission first?

Sera: Fine. Please can I NOT find more of your mucky little books. Drawings. Ew.

 

Hee hee!

[AnimalBoy]

I've romanced Sera and i've been trying to get some of the romantic banter to trigger but none of the other companions seem to want to talk about it.

[YourFunnyUncle]

I've romanced Sera and i've been trying to get some of the romantic banter to trigger but none of the other companions seem to want to talk about it.

As I recall, there are definitely relationship-based banters from both Cassandra and Bull. Cassandra's is very sweet, actually.

[Serza]

So much nice stuff, and I'm out of likes. Heh.

[FemHawke FTW]

So much nice stuff, and I'm out of likes. Heh.

The Sera thread is notorious for stealing thumbs yeah?

[Serza]

Well, I got drunk in the DQ before coming here, so that played a part...

[AnimalBoy]

As I recall, there are definitely relationship-based banters from both Cassandra and Bull. Cassandra's is very sweet, actually.

 

 

I know. I saw a compilation of them on Youtube. I've done everything there is to do with her romance other then her bad dream scene and i'm hoping that's why they haven't triggered yet since it's not officially locked in. Right now they're talking about everything but.

[SardaukarElite]

Without passing comment on the political reasons for choosing our current calendar, the fact remains that there is no year zero, so the third millennium didn't technically start until 2001. I think the confusion arises because we are used to celebrating birthdays and anniversaries, where the ticking over of the first digit does indeed signify a nice round number in base ten.

 

My point is that you are counting the years since a starting point picked well before of when you started counting so whether its 1000 years since 1 AD or 0 AD (1 BC) is really irrelevant. You might as well be celebrating how pretty it is to have three zeroes in the year number.

 

Sometimes the party is more important than the reason.