You're just like Robb Stark. Won't see the danger until its too late
That's pretty rude comparing someone to that idiot called Robb Stark. ![]()
You're just like Robb Stark. Won't see the danger until its too late
That's pretty rude comparing someone to that idiot called Robb Stark. ![]()
I'm still crossing my fingers that the Joffrey likeness is a coincidence though
doN'T. I'm trying to forget this comparison.
Damn you Han! D:<
That's pretty rude comparing someone to that idiot called Robb Stark.
Alright, your just like Nedd Stark then.
Everyone knows the best Stark's are Howard and Tony.
OOOOOOOOOOH DAAAAYUM. I cannot like this enough.
I can just see it now, the Inquisitor comes upon Sera having killed a ton of people and she goes "...What?" and the Inquisitor just laughs and ruffles her hair. "Oh You Scamp, your coming with me to fight Demons!"
Spoiler
So is she loyal or only loyal if she agrees with our goals ?
I kinda like the short hair myself.
Makes sense for an Archer, to keep it our of her eyes.
It seems that way
You mean the latter ? Mhh. Wonder what that means.
You mean the latter ? Mhh. Wonder what that means.
Are they bringing approval systems back? I keep forgetting?
Unless she has high approval, I don't think she's going to go along with what we say (if it's against her personal beliefs) or have a high respect for us [which would kind of fall under the approval settings]
Are they bringing approval systems back? I keep forgetting?
Unless she has high approval, I don't think she's going to go along with what we say (if it's against her personal beliefs) or have a high respect for us [which would kind of fall under the approval settings]
They haven't really said. I think they said they aren't doing friendship/rivalry again (or I could be imagining this), but I think they've implied they want to do something more nuanced that DA:O's approval system. Not that I know what that means.
They haven't really said. I think they said they aren't doing friendship/rivalry again (or I could be imagining this), but I think they've implied they want to do something more nuanced that DA:O's approval system. Not that I know what that means.
Hmmm. I actually kind of liked the friendship/rivalry thing.
Are they bringing approval systems back? I keep forgetting?
Unless she has high approval, I don't think she's going to go along with what we say (if it's against her personal beliefs) or have a high respect for us [which would kind of fall under the approval settings]
I think so, like in DAO, the friendship /rivalry thing disappeared. And Yeah I agree. I feel she isn't going to go along with what we say, if it's against her personal beliefs and maybe she will reject some orders if she really despises the inquisitor. ![]()
On the opposite, if she has high respect for the inquisitor, if she trusts him /her overall, she might accept some harsh decisions to her or can be influenced.
They haven't really said. I think they said they aren't doing friendship/rivalry again (or I could be imagining this), but I think they've implied they want to do something more nuanced that DA:O's approval system. Not that I know what that means.
No, you are right on the rivalry thing! I just can't remember anything else about that lol.
I think so, like in DAO, the friendship /rivalry thing disappeared. And Yeah I agree. I feel she isn't going to go along with what we say, if it's against her personal beliefs and maybe she will reject some orders if she really despises the inquisitor.
On the opposite, if she has high respect for the inquisitor, if she trusts him /her overall, she might accept some harsh decisions to her or can be influenced.
I'm so excited, Syl, I want the game now ![]()
No, you are right on the rivalry thing! I just can't remember anything else about that lol.
I'm so excited, Syl, I want the game now
The same Div'. ![]()
Together we will be able to overcome it, I swear ! ><
Hmmm. I actually kind of liked the friendship/rivalry thing.
Yea, I did too. Really, I think the whole problem with the friendship/rivalry system was that they colored it blue and red, and too many people think blue is good and red is bad. Should have done yellow and purple, people probably would have been a lot more open to rivalry as a result.
I just don't want companion content to be gated by approval - which I THINK they said wouldn't happen, it would be more event based. But I don't really know what that means.
So is she loyal or only loyal if she agrees with our goals ?
She is loyal as long as you don't ask her to do something against her beliefs. Once you earn her trust, she is with you through thick and thin.
She is loyal as long as you don't ask her to do something against her beliefs. Once you earn her trust, she is with you through thick and thin.
Even if she doesn't believe what you're doing is right?
Even if she doesn't believe what you're doing is right?
She'll express her concerns over it, and try to talk you out of doing it. If you continue past them, I really can't say because nobody ever went that far on the side she was on.
She'll express her concerns over it, and try to talk you out of doing it. If you continue past them, I really can't say because nobody ever went that far on the side she was on.
I like it though, I mean, usually all of our followers can be persuaded or agree with us. This will make for a nice change.
I didn't expect it from her though.
Well they have said that we'll be able to make party members leave again.
I expect most all of them, except maybe Cassandra, will have a line in the sand that they won't cross.
Well they have said that we'll be able to make party members leave again.
I expect most all of them, except maybe Cassandra, will have a line in the sand that they won't cross.
Oh good.
I wonder if you get a nonstandard game over from antagonizing all your companions. That'd be funny.