63 réponses à ce sujet

[CybAnt1]

Well, then, thank goodness for my PS4. Heh. I purchased the iMac for mostly non-gaming reasons (well, except for an impulse buy of Civ 5 and, down the road, maybe EVE), but if Boot Camp makes the iMac run Windows well enough, maybe I'll partition the HD and go from there.

 

BootCamp may seem to be the only option; I think this thing will not run very well under Fusion or Parallels. And may not run at all under Crossover.

 

They Ciderized DAO and DA2, but Frostbite doesn't seem to like undergoing Ciderization. So far. 

 

I hate rebooting, but you gotta do what you gotta do. (I haven't owned a gaming console in a long time.)

[katerinafm]

Probably, but nothing extreme. The game will still look pretty great due to the engine regardless

[KC_Prototype]

Watch Dogs looks just as good on PS4 as it did at E3 of 2012, what are you griping about?

[TKavatar]

Watch Dogs looks just as good on PS4 as it did at E3 of 2012, what are you griping about?

 

Em no it doesn't...see for yourself.

 

 

And by the way, this is from the PS4 version, a dev confirmed this on Twitter.

[I SOLD MY SOUL TO BIOWARE]

I hope the PC version of Watch Dogs is at least up to snuff with what we saw in 2012. Not holding my breath, though.

[Ieldra]

I find it interesting that some gamers are complaining that the past generation consoles are dragging down the quality when some gamers on this forum may not have a PC or graphics card that could handle the game if it was only developed for the next-gen and high end pc rigs. Unless the graphics requirements are like DA2 I foresee some PC gamers upgrading their systems, buying new PCs or forgoing the game.

You see, even if DAI would look like sh*t on my PC, it would be my choice to put up with it or to upgrade my PC. If I don't have the money, too bad but it's still something I could try to change. There were games I replayed after three years with upgraded graphics and they looked significantly better. That's what can happen if the visuals are designed for high-end hardware but adaptable through options to lower-end hardware. It's as things should be. Don't cut features, just disable them for the lower-end hardware.

Also, there is a difference between not implementing high-end visuals in the first place and implementing them and then cutting them again because of the consoles' limitations. Having had a look at the high-res video footage from the GameStar video, I want my DAI game to look like that, I know my PC can handle it and I also know they already made it look so good. It's all there. If the published game has to be downgraded from a better-looking version that already existed, I see a reason to complain.

[deuce985]

LOL
 

 
I can't wait for "Watch_Dogs 2012 Edition" on PlayStation 5.

makes me concerned about The Division from Ubisoft.

[TurretSyndrome]

Also, there is a difference between not implementing high-end visuals in the first place and implementing them and then cutting them again because of the consoles' limitations. Having had a look at the high-res video footage from the GameStar video, I want my DAI game to look like that, I know my PC can handle it and I also know they already made it look so good. It's all there. If the published game has to be downgraded from a better-looking version that already existed, I see a reason to complain.

 

You know when that damned video is going to be released on youtube or something? I wanna see what the fuss is all about.

[Ryzaki]

Same.

 

But yeah I rather have high graphics in the first place that I have to scroll down for smooth play. I will eventually upgrade my comp so I'll see those pretty graphics eventually.

[Samahl na Revas]

What system was the pax demo? If it continues to look like that, great. I pre-ordered Watch dogs, and after Second Son being too short I can care less about graphics and more about content and game length. Will taking over a keep be as repetitive as taking down a D.U.P main hub, etc. Those things would bother me more than a graphic downgrade.

[Jsixgun]

I'm sure 360 and ps3 players are going to have to live withy muddy less dynamic details and environments, but I'd say it will still look alright. Next gen better wow though.

[Althix]

no idea. but in the last four years i didn't saw any game that could put even 580 gtx to the limit. its all about developer and coding, and coding in the most cases is horrible - battlefield 3/4 as example.

[Allan Schumacher]

To be perfectly honest, I actually like that the cross platform development slowed the graphics push.

I used to be a graphics enthusiast going back to the TNT2 Ultra days up until probably the Radeon X1900XTX days. After I got that last card though, I milked that computer until it exploded and I'm welllll beyond "graphics look plenty darn good to me" state. I like it (and am constantly impressed) with newer graphics, but things are pretty good IMO and I can save some money to boot.


(Also, deleted some posts. Talking about how you're convinced that EA is going to turn this game to crap leads me to believe that you aren't actually interested in the game, but are just looking on trolling for laughs which is a violation of forum rules. Note that this isn't a discussion point and if you have any grievances with me doing this to send me a PM).