Sounds like the way a few of my Shepards make decisions.
I think they're more loyal to specific people than causes.
That's why I'm never sabotaging the Genophage, I always keep Wrex alive and I'm not going to shoot Mordin in the back.
I still thought they were pretty bad. I can understand why they would be skeptical of Shepard's visions, maybe even consider him untrustworthy in ME2 due to the events surrounding his resurrection and a temporary alliance with Cerberus, but they seemed to admit at the end of ME1 that they believed Shepard about the Reapers (after they were attacked by one). Even if they were in denial about the existence of the Reapers, shouldn't they still take any threat seriously, as crazy as it may sound, and at least attempt to prepare themselves to defend against an attack?
Maybe Shepard should have made a better argument, insisted that they really shouldn't take a chance like that when so many lives are at stake, or something. Because what happens if Shepard is right, the threat is real, and they just ignored it? The fact that they would do this is so strange to me.
I'm on board with them for not trusting Shepard as I always thought many of the characters were a little too complacent on his resurrection, return, and subsequent working for Cerberus.
It's the fact that they pretty much try to shove that whole Sovereign/Geth business under the rug. Like even if they believed the Geth built Sovereign that still leaves the possibility that next time they might build 1 or 2 or a few more when they next launch an assault from behind the Perseus Veil.





Retour en haut





